Abstract:BACKGROUND:This study compared 3 nebulizer technologies for inter- and intradevice reproducibility, humidification, and fill volume sensitivity during mechanical ventilation: a breath-enhanced jet nebulizer, a vibrating mesh nebulizer, and a jet nebulizer. The breath-enhanced jet nebulizer featured a new design located on the wet side of the humidifier to reduce aerosol loss and potential humidifier contamination. The vibrating mesh nebulizer and the jet nebulizer were placed on the dry side.METHODS:Aerosol delivery was measured using multiple ventilator settings (inspiratory time = 0.45–1.01 s). Using radiolabeled saline and a gamma camera, bench studies were performed using a ventilator to test 4 breathing patterns. Four scenarios were assessed during testing: 3 mL and 6 mL fill volumes with and without heated wire humidification. Measurements included inhaled mass (as a percentage of the nebulizer charge), nebulizer residual, mass balance, and aerosol particle size distribution. Statistics were determined using Mann-Whitney and linear regression.RESULTS:The inhaled mass for the breath-enhanced jet nebulizer was 10.5–29.2% and was affected by fill volume (P = .004) but not by humidity. The inhaled mass for the vibrating mesh nebulizer was 0.9–33% and was unaffected by fill volume and humidity. The inhaled mass for the jet nebulizer was 2.5–25.9% and was affected by both fill volume (P = .009) and humidity (3 mL, P = .002). The inhaled mass for the vibrating mesh nebulizer was more variable due to random failures to achieve complete nebulization, and inhaled mass correlated closely with residual mass: IM% = –0.233(Residual%) + 24.3, r2 = 0.67, P < .001. For all devices, large particles were lost in the ventilator tubing; large particles were also lost in the humidifier for the vibrating mesh nebulizer (17% nebulizer charge), resulting in similar particle distributions (mass median aerodynamic diameter 1.33–1.95 μm) for all devices.CONCLUSIONS:Nebulization with the breath-enhanced jet nebulizer was less sensitive to humidification than the jet nebulizer. Delivery via the vibrating mesh nebulizer was not predictable, with random failure to empty (55% experimental runs). All devices delivered similar particle distributions. Wet-side aerosol delivery avoids humidifier contamination, and breath-enhanced technology can ensure better control of drug delivery.

Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer

Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD20

Use of a vibrating mesh nebulizer for allergen challenge

Effect of Nebulizer Location and Spontaneous Breathing on Aerosol Delivery During Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Bench Testing

Response to Bronchodilators Administered via Different Nebulizers in Patients With COPD Exacerbation

SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study

Physicochemical aspects and efficiency of albuterol nebulization: comparison of three aerosol types in an in vitro pediatric model

Atomization Efficacy of a Novel Micro-Dose Mesh Nebulizer (CVS-100) Versus the Traditional Mesh Nebulizer (M102) in Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

Comparison of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer in the Pediatric Asthma Patient: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bronchodilator Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in COPD: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer

Effect of Aerosol Devices and Administration Techniques on Drug Delivery in a Simulated Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Tracheostomy Model

Clinical Efficacy of Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizers With Different Interfaces in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma

Comparison of Vibrating Mesh, Jet, and Breath-Enhanced Nebulizers During Mechanical Ventilation

1134 A comparison of the aerogen vibrating mesh nebuliser versus a standard jet nebuliser to deliver bronchodilators in moderate to severe asthma in the emergency department

In-vitro/in-vivo comparison of inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during non-invasive ventilation

Presence of variable extrathoracic airflow limitation in patients with a negative methacholine challenge test

Reliability of Vibrating Mesh Technology

Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory‐synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation

In Vitro Comparison of Aerosol Delivery in High-Frequency Assisted Airway Clearance Devices With Integrated Nebulizers

Factors Determining Continuous Infusion Aerosol Delivery During Mechanical Ventilation

Efficacy and usability of a novel nebulizer targeting both upper and lower airways