Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory‐synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation

Jie Li,Paul Karabelas,Lingyue Gong,Caylie A. Sheridan,James B. Fink
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27356
IF: 4.0899
2024-11-07
Pediatric Pulmonology
Abstract:Background An inspiration‐synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small‐particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration‐synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation. Methods A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small‐particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration‐synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y‐piece, and between Y‐piece and ETT (Y‐ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y‐ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm). Results The inspiration‐synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p
pediatrics,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?