[Hydrops fetalis. Questions of pre- and postnatal diagnosis and pathogenesis].

H. Senft,H. Födisch,M. Hansmann

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Prithviraj Bose,Mansour Alfayez,Srdan Verstovsek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-019-0604-y

2019-01-24

Abstract:Seven years after the approval of the Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib, it remains the only drug licensed for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Patients who discontinue ruxolitinib have a dismal outcome, and this is, therefore, an area of significant unmet need. Given the central role that JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) activation plays in disease pathogenesis, there have been many other JAK inhibitors tested, but most have been abandoned, for a variety of reasons. The JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib has recently been resurrected, and there has been a resurgence of interest in the failed JAK1/2 inhibitor momelotinib, which possibly improves anemia. Pacritinib, a non-myelosuppressive JAK2-selective inhibitor, is currently in a dose-ranging study mandated by regulatory authorities. A plethora of other targeted agents, most backed by preclinical data, are in various stages of investigation. These include epigenetic and immune therapies, agents targeting cellular survival, metabolic and apoptotic pathways, the cell cycle, DNA repair, and protein folding and degradation, among others. However, at this time, none of these is close to registration or even in a pivotal trial, illustrating the difficulties in recapitulating the clinical disease in preclinical models. Most current clinical trials are testing the addition of a novel agent to ruxolitinib, either in the frontline setting or in the context of an insufficient response to ruxolitinib, or attempting to study new drugs in the second-line, "ruxolitinib failure" setting. Emerging data supports the addition of azacitidine to ruxolitinib in some patients. Other strategies have focused on improving cytopenias, through amelioration of bone marrow fibrosis or other mechanisms. This is important, because cytopenias are the commonest reason for ruxolitinib interruption and/or dose reduction, and dose optimization of ruxolitinib is tied to its survival benefit. The activin receptor ligand trap, sotatercept, and the anti-fibrotic agent, PRM-151, have shown promise in this regard.
Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis: phase II & III clinical trials

Douglas Tremblay,Ronald Hoffman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2021.2015320

2021-10-02

Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Myelofibrosis is a clonal hematologic malignancy with clinical manifestations that include cytopenias, debilitating constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis and a propensity toward leukemic progression. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative, this therapy is not available for the majority of patients. Ruxolitinib and fedratinib are approved JAK2 inhibitors that have produced meaningful benefits in terms of spleen reduction and symptom improvement, but there remain several unmet needs.AREAS COVERED: We discuss novel therapies based upon published data from phase II or III clinical trials. Specifically, we cover novel JAK inhibitors (momelotinib and pacritinib), and agents that target bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (pelabresib), the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-2/BCL-xL (navitoclax), MDM2 (navtemadlin), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (parsaclisib), or telomerase (imetelstat).EXPERT OPINION: Patients with disease related cytopenias are ineligible for currently approved JAK2 inhibitors. However, momelotinib and pacritinib may be able to fill this void. Novel therapies are being evaluated in the upfront setting to improve the depth and duration of responses with ruxolitinib. Future evaluation of agents must be judged on their potential to modify disease progression, which current JAK2 inhibitors lack. Combination therapy, possibly with an immunotherapeutic agent might serve as key components of future myelofibrosis treatment options.

pharmacology & pharmacy
New Treatments for Myelofibrosis

Douglas Tremblay,Ruben Mesa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01052-9

Abstract:Currently approved therapies for myelofibrosis (MF) consist of JAK inhibitors, which produce meaningful improvements in spleen size and symptom burden but do not significantly impact leukemic progression. In addition, many patients develop resistance or intolerance to existing therapies and are left without meaningful therapeutic options. There has been recent rapid development of agents in MF that may be able to fill these unmet needs. Importantly, most treatments currently in clinical development have targets outside the JAK-STAT pathway, including BET, BCL-2/BCL-xL, PI3k, HDM2, PIM-1, SINE, telomerase, LSD1, and CD123. These therapies are being tested in combination with JAK inhibitors in the front-line setting and in patients with a suboptimal response, as well as a single agent after JAK inhibitor failure. This next generation of agents is likely to produce a paradigm shift in MF treatment with a focus on combination treatment targeting multiple areas of MF pathophysiology.
Myelofibrosis Drug Development through the Decade: Novel JAK Inhibitors

Ali Younas Khan,Muhammad Junaid Tariq,Muhammad Usman,Awais Ijaz,Abdul Rafae,Mustafa Nadeem Malik,Hafiz Muhammad Fazeel,Nadia Carenina Nunes Cavalcante Parr,Muhammad Asad Fraz,Muhammad Jahanzeb Khalil,Jemin Aby Jose,Seren Durer,Ceren Durer,Faiz Anwer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-115408

IF: 20.3

2018-11-29

Blood

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF), a BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), has an annual incidence of 1 in 100000 for the primary MF and 0.3-0.7 in 100000 for secondary MF in the USA. MF patients have a median survival of 6.5 years. The primary mutation, JAK2V617F, occurs in 40-60% of MF cases. Ruxolotinib, a JAK inhibitor, has been the mainstay in treating high risk, debilitating MF but largely clinical needs are unmet. Methods A comprehensive literature research was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov. We included all trials that were under development in phase I/II/III trials. Our search identified 1642 full-length manuscripts or abstracts with published results in the last decade ( Jan 2007 till Dec 2017) were screened for relevant studies. After screening by 2 independent reviewers, 212 articles were finalized for our final analyses. We have reviewed the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of 2nd generation JAK inhibitors in this review. Results JAK1 inhibitor: Itacitinib reduced total symptom score (TSS) ≥ 50% in 15/42 (36%) patients. Mild gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances and some grade 3-4 myelosuppression (anemia: 33%, thrombocytopenia: 29%) were reported. JAK2 inhibitors: In PERSIST-1, pacritinib when compared to best available therapy (BAT) showed SVR ≥ 35% in 19.1% vs. 4.7% patients, with lower rates of myelosuppression (thrombocytopenia: 17%, anemia: 11%). In PERSIST-2, a phase III trial of pacritinb vs. BAT in patients with baseline cytopenias, similar efficacy was demonstrated (SVR ≥ 35%: 18% vs. 3%). Increasing rates of heart failure and intracranial hemorrhages led to a temporary hold which was lifted in August 2017. Lestaurtinib showed CI in 7 (44%) patients in a phase I trial (n=16) and 6 (27%) patients in a phase II trial (n=22). Most notable toxicities were G 1/2 GI disturbances, anemia occurred in 14% and thrombocytopenia in 23% of patients. In a phase III trial (n=193), fedratinib showed a SVR ≥ 35% and a TSS ≥ 50% in 40% and 36% patients, respectively. However, incidence of significant neurotoxicity and Wernicke's encephalopathy led to its suspension. Similarly, a trial of XL019 was terminated due to emergence of central and peripheral neurotoxicity. In a phase I trial (n=48), NS-018 exhibited a spleen length reduction (SLR) ≥ 50% in 20 (56%) patients along with prompt improvement in bone marrow fibrosis (37%). Anemia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 15% and 27% of patients, respectively. Dizziness (23%) and nausea (19%) were also reported. Gandotinib demonstrated SLR ≥50% in 62% patients, in a phase I trial (n=38). G1 diarrhea (55.3%) and nausea (42.1%) were the most common toxicities. JAK 1/2 inhibitors: SIMPLIFY-1 (S1), a phase III clinical trial (n=432) of momelotinib vs. ruxolotinib in JAK inhibitor-naïve patients, demonstrated non-inferiority for momelotinib, in spleen volume reduction (SVR) ≥ 35% (26.5% vs. 29%; p=0.01). However, SIMPLIFY-2 trial (S2), that compared these two drugs in JAK inhibitor exposed patients did not achieve similar responses with momelotinib (6.7% vs. 5.8%; p=0.90). Interestingly, momelotinib excelled at achieving transfusion independency in both trials (S1: 66.5% vs. 49.3%; p=0.001, S2: 43.3% vs 21.2%; p=0.001). Grade ≥ 3 infections and peripheral neuropathy were the major toxicities noted. These trials were suspended after 89% of patients failed to achieve the primary endpoint of SVR. AZD1480 demonstrated clinical improvement (CI) in four (11%) patients in a phase I trial (n=35). Most common adverse events included grade (G) 1-2 dizziness and anemia. Conclusion Novel JAK pathway inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in MF but safety concerns regarding the hematological (cytopenias) and non-hematological adverse effects needs to be addressed until their use in clinical practice is established. Momelotinib success in achieving anemia related endpoints is note-worthy and should be further explored in this regard. A phase II study [NCT03165734] evaluating pacritinib monotherapy as a second line treatment in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia is ongoing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

hematology
[Development of novel therapeutic agents for myelofibrosis]

Hiroki Yamaguchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11406/rinketsu.64.1298

Abstract:Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative tumor with a poor prognosis that not only impairs the quality of life because of splenomegaly and debilitating systemic symptoms but also has a high acute myeloid leukemia progression rate. Ruxolitinib, a JAK inhibitor, enhances systemic symptoms in MF and prolongs survival; however, it is not effective in suppressing bone marrow fibrosis and leukemia progression, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains needed for treatment. As a result, many new drugs for MF are presently being developed. Many similar drugs have been demonstrated to enhance therapeutic effectiveness if combined with ruxolitinib, particularly BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitors, bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors, and human double-minute homolog 2 inhibitors, to improve bone marrow fibrosis. This study provides an overview of drugs currently employed in clinical trials being performed in Japan.
Ruxolitinib/nilotinib Cotreatment Inhibits Leukemia-Propagating Cells in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL.

Yuan Kong,Yi-Lin Wu,Yang Song,Min-Min Shi,Xie-Na Cao,Hong-Yan Zhao,Ya-Zhen Qin,Yue-Yun Lai,Hao Jiang,Qian Jiang,Xiao-Jun Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1286-5

IF: 8.44

2017-01-01

Journal of Translational Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND:As one of the major treatment obstacles in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL), relapse of Ph+ALL may result from the persistence of leukemia-propagating cells (LPCs). Research using a xenograft mouse assay recently determined that LPCs were enriched in the CD34+CD38-CD58- fraction in human Ph+ALL. Additionally, a cohort study demonstrated that Ph+ALL patients with a LPCs phenotype at diagnosis exhibited a significantly higher cumulative incidence of relapse than those with the other cell phenotypes even with uniform front-line imatinib-based therapy pre- and post-allotransplant, thus highlighting the need for novel LPCs-based therapeutic strategies.METHODS:RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were performed to analyze the gene expression profiles of the sorted LPCs and other cell fractions from patients with de novo Ph+ALL. In order to assess the effects of the selective BCR-ABL and/or Janus kinase (JAK)2 inhibition therapy by the treatment with single agents or a combination of ruxolitinib and imatinib or nilotinib on Ph+ALL LPCs, drug-induced apoptosis of LPCs was investigated in vitro, as well as in vivo using sublethally irradiated and anti-CD122-conditioned NOD/SCID xenograft mouse assay. Moreover, western blot analyses were performed on the bone marrow cells harvested from the different groups of recipient mice.RESULTS:RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR demonstrated that JAK2 was more highly expressed in the sorted LPCs than in the other cell fractions in de novo Ph+ALL patients. Combination treatment with a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) and nilotinib more effectively eliminated LPCs than either therapy alone or both in vitro and in humanized Ph+ALL mice by reducing phospho-CrKL and phospho-JAK2 activities at the molecular level.CONCLUSIONS:In summary, this pre-clinical study provides a scientific rationale for simultaneously targeting BCR-ABL and JAK2 activities as a promising anti-LPCs therapeutic approach for patients with de novo Ph+ALL.
P1033: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were refractory or relapsed to ruxolitinib: a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study

Yi Zhang,Qi-Ke Zhang,Qingchi Liu,Hui-Bing Dang,Sujun Gao,Wei Wang,Hu Zhou,Yuqing Chen,Liangming Ma,Jishi Wang,Peng Zhao,Haiping Yang,Qiu Zhao,Shanshan Suo,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000971028.48500.0d

2023-01-01

HemaSphere

Abstract:Topic: 16. Myeloproliferative neoplasms - Clinical Background: Currently, the only marketed Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis in China is Ruxolitinib, which demonstrated symptomatic and splenic benefit despite of exacerbated cytopenias. However, it is reported that at least 50% of patients treated with ruxolitinib could develop resistance or intolerance during the long-term follow up, for whom the life expectancy is largely reduced. There are limited therapeutic options available after ruxolitinib failure. Jaktinib, an oral novel JAK and AVCR1 inhibitor showed promising results in patients with intermediate or high risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Aims: We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate jaktinib in patients who were refractory or relapsed to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Methods: Patients who had primary, post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis and were previously treated with ruxolitinib for at least 3 months and with either inadequate efficacy response (defined as <10% spleen volume reduction [SVR] by MRI/CT or <30% decrease in spleen size by palpation from baseline) or spleen regrowth to <10% SVR or <30% decrease in spleen size from baseline following an initial response were recruited to receive jaktinib 100 mg bid. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with SVR ≥35% from baseline (SVR35) at week 24, measured by MRI/CT images and assessed by Independent Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included the best spleen response rate (defined as achieving SVR35 at any time), the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in Myeloproliterative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS), improvement of anemia, safety, etc. Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. The median duration of previous ruxolitinib treatment was 18.6 months. The median baseline TSS was 19.5 (range 1-55), hemoglobin was 101.5 g/L (range 61-149), and platelet count was 159×109/L (range 66-951). Patient baseline characteristics are shown in the Table 1.At week 24, 11 (32.4%) patients achieved SVR35. The best spleen response rate was 38.2% (13/34). The median time to achieve the first SVR35 was 8.1 weeks, and the median duration of response was not reached. At week 24, 13 (46.4%) patients achieved a ≥50% improvement in TSS from baseline. Of 16 transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin ≤100 g/L at baseline, eight (50.0%) had a ≥20 g/L hemoglobin increase by week 24. Of 6 patients who required red blood cell transfusion at baseline, two (33.3%) had a 50% decrease in red blood cell infusion by week 24. The median exposure time of jaktinib was 231 days (range 96-371). Twenty three (67.6%) patients had one or more grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia (32.4%, n=11), thrombocytopenia (32.4%, n=11), leukocytosis (20.6%, n=7) and leukopenia (11.8%, n=4). A dose reduction or temporary interruption due to TEAEs were reported in 9 (26.5%) patients. Treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 2 (5.9%) patients. Summary/Conclusion: Jaktinib is effective and well tolerated in myelofibrosis patients who were refractory/relapsed to ruxolitinib. Jaktinib not only substantially improves splenomegaly, but also reduces myelofibrosis-related symptoms. Therefore, jaktinib could become a new treatment option for those patients failed to ruxolitinib. Keywords: Myelofibrosis, Phase II, Myeloproliferative disorder, Janus Kinase inhibitor
Momelotinib (JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor): mechanism of action, clinical trial reports, and therapeutic prospects beyond myelofibrosis

Ayalew Tefferi,Animesh Pardanani,Naseema Gangat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.282612

2023-03-03

Haematologica

Abstract:Janus kinase 2 inhibitors (JAKi) are now part of the therapeutic armamentarium for primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF). Patients with MF endure shortened survival and poor quality of life (QoL). Allogeneic stem cell transplant is currently the only treatment modality in MF with the potential to cure the disease or prolong survival. By contrast, current drug therapy in MF targets QoL and does not modify the natural history of the disease. The discovery of JAK2 and other JAK-STAT activating mutations (i.e., CALR and MPL) in myeloproliferative neoplasms, including MF, has facilitated the development of several JAKi that are not necessarily specific to the oncogenic mutations themselves but proved effective in countering JAK-STAT signaling, resulting in suppression of inflammatory cytokines and myeloproliferation. This non-specific activity resulted in clinically favorable effects on constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly and, consequently, FDA approval of three small molecule JAKi: ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. A fourth JAKi, momelotinib, is poised for FDA approval soon and has been shown to provide additional benefit in alleviating transfusiondependent anemia in MF. The salutary effect of momelotinib on anemia has been attributed to inhibition of activin A receptor, type 1 (ACVR1) and recent information suggests similar effect from pacritinib. ACRV1 mediates SMAD2/3 signalling that contributes to upregulation of hepcidin production and iron-restricted erythropoiesis. Therapeutic targeting of ACRV1 raises therapeutic prospects in other myeloid neoplasms associated with ineffective erythropoiesis, such as myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts or SF3B1 mutation, especially those with co-expression of JAK2 mutation and thrombocytosis.

hematology
Ten years after ruxolitinib approval for myelofibrosis: a review of clinical efficacy

Naveen Pemmaraju,Prithviraj Bose,Raajit Rampal,Aaron T. Gerds,Angela Fleischman,Srdan Verstovsek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2023.2196593

2023-04-22

Abstract:Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, abnormal cytokine expression, cytopenias, and progressive bone marrow fibrosis. The disease often manifests with burdensome symptoms and is associated with reduced survival. Ruxolitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2 inhibitor, was the first agent approved for MF. As a first-in-class targeted treatment, ruxolitinib approval transformed the MF treatment approach and remains standard of care. In addition, targeted inhibition of JAK1/JAK2 signaling, a key molecular pathway underlying MF pathogenesis, and the large volume of literature evaluating ruxolitinib, have led to a better understanding of the disease and improved management in general. Here we review ruxolitinib efficacy in patients with MF in the 10 years following approval, including demonstration of clinical benefit in the phase 3 COMFORT-I/II trials, real-world evidence, translational studies, and expanded access data. Lastly, future directions for MF treatment are discussed, including ruxolitinib-based combination therapies.

oncology,hematology
How I individualize selection of JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis

Lucia Masarova,Helen T Chifotides

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2023022415

IF: 20.3

2024-10-03

Blood

Abstract:The advent of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) inaugurated a novel era in the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Four JAKi have been approved for intermediate or high-risk MF, in the US. Regulatory approval of the first JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, in 2011 transformed the landscape of MF by markedly controlling splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, improving patients' lives, and prolonging survival. Fedratinib, the second...

hematology
Identification of bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP9) as a novel profibrotic factor in vitro.

José M. Muñoz-Félix,C. Cuesta,Nuria Perretta-Tejedor,Mariela Subileau,F. López-Hernández,J. López-Novoa,C. Martínez-Salgado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.05.015

IF: 4.85

2016-09-01

Cellular Signalling

Abstract:
Advances in pharmacotherapy for myelofibrosis: what is the current state of play?

Mario Tiribelli,Gianluca Morelli,Massimiliano Bonifacio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2354461

2024-05-15

Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract:Introduction The introduction of the first JAK inhibitor (JAKi) ruxolitinib 10 years ago represented a pivotal advancement in myelofibrosis (MF) treatment, mostly in terms of spleen and symptoms response. Nowadays three more JAKi, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib, are available for both ruxolitinib-resistant and naïve patients. Moreover, many drugs are currently being investigated, both alone and in combination with JAKi.

pharmacology & pharmacy
Experimental therapeutics for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasias

Meetu Agrawal,Ravin J Garg,Jorge Cortes,Hagop Kantarjian,Srdan Verstovsek,Alfonso Quintas-Cardama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25672

IF: 6.9209

2011-02-15

Cancer

Abstract:Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by stem cell-derived, unrestrained clonal myeloproliferation. The World Health Organization classification system, proposed in 2008, identifies 7 distinct categories of Ph-negative MPNs including essential thrombocythemia (ET); polycythemia vera (PV); primary myelofibrosis (PMF); mastocytosis; chronic eosinophilic leukemia; chronic neutrophilic leukemia; and MPN, unclassifiable. For many years, the treatment of ET, PV, and PMF, the most frequently diagnosed Ph-negative MPNs, has been largely supportive. In recent years, that paradigm has been challenged because of the discovery of a recurrent point mutation in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene (JAK2(V617F)). This mutation can be detected in the vast majority of patients with PV and approximately half of patients with ET or PMF and serves as both a diagnostic marker as well as representing a putative molecular target for drug development. Several putative targeted agents with significant in vitro JAK2 inhibitory activity and various degrees of JAK2 specificity are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Furthermore, other investigational non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approaches such as immunomodulatory agents and pegylated interferon- have also shown promising results in MPNs.
P1021: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were intolerant to ruxolitinib: an open-label, single-arm phase 2b study

Yi Zhang,Hu Zhou,Zhijian Xiao,Minghui Duan,Sujun Gao,Guangsheng He,Hongmei Jing,Junmin Li,Liangming Ma,Huanling Zhu,Chunkang Chang,Xin Du,Mei Hong,Xin Li,Qingchi Liu,Wei Wang,Nuo Xu,Haiping Yang,Qiu Zhao,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000970984.18863.91

2023-01-01

HemaSphere

Abstract:Topic: 16. Myeloproliferative neoplasms - Clinical Background: As the first approved Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) for patients with symptomatic myelofibrosis (MF), ruxolitinib showed superiority in spleen volume reduction with increased anemia and thrombocytopenia. However, there are few treatment options after ruxolitinib intolerance. Jaktinib, an oral novel JAK and ACVR1 inhibitor showed promising efficacy in JAKi-naïve patients with intermediate or high risk MF with mild side effects. Aims: We conducted a single-arm phase 2b study to evaluate jaktinib in MF patients who were intolerant to ruxolitinib. Here we present the results of the cohort of patients who received jaktinib 100 mg twice a day. Methods: Patients who had primary, post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia MF and were previously treated with ruxolitinib for ≥28 days who either required red blood cell (RBC) transfusions or required more frequent transfusions on ruxolitinib, or had grade 3/4 anemia, thrombocytopenia or hematoma when receiving ruxolitinib, and with palpable spleen ≥5 cm were included. Patients were excluded from the study if they had received ruxolitinib ≥20 mg Bid for at least three months and were refractory or relapsed to ruxolitinib. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline (SVR35) at week 24, assessed by Independent Review Committee on the basis of MRI/CT images. Secondary endpoints included the best spleen response rate (defined as achieving SVR35 at any time), the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in MPN Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS), anemia response, safety, etc. Results: In the full analysis set for efficacy, a total of 44 patients received jaktinib 100 mg twice daily and had completed the 24-week treatments and evaluations or terminated prior to week 24. In addition, one patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis due to incorrect diagnosis of MF but included in the safety analysis. The median baseline TSS was 9.5, hemoglobin was 80 g/L, and platelet count was 132.5×109/L. Patient baseline characteristics are summarized in the Table 1. While on ruxolitinib, 21 patients (47.7%) required RBC transfusion and all patients experienced grade 3/4 anemia, thrombocytopenia or both.The SVR35 rate at week 24 was 43.2% (19/44). Over the study phase, the best spleen response rate was 54.5% (24/44). The median time to achieve the first SVR35 was 12.1 weeks. Spleen response was maintained in 80.4% patients for at least 24 weeks and median duration was not reached. At week 24, 61.8% of the evaluable patients achieved a ≥50% improvement in TSS from baseline. Of 31 transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin ≤100 g/L at baseline, 13 (41.9%) had an increase of hemoglobin ≥20 g/L by week 24. Of 19 patients who required RBC transfusion at baseline, 11 (57.9%) had a 50% decrease in RBC infusion frequency by week 24. Of nine transfusion-dependent patients at baseline, one became transfusion-independent by week 24. In the safety set (n=45), the median jaktinib exposure time was 280 days. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (31.1%, n=14), thrombocytopenia (22.2%, n=10), pneumonia (17.8%, n=8), neutropenia (15.6%, n=7) and leukopenia (15.6%, n=7). Treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in five patients (11.1%). A dose reduction or temporary interruption due to TEAEs were reported in 12 patients (26.7%). Summary/Conclusion: Jaktinib demonstrated promising therapeutic activities in MF patients intolerant to ruxolitinib. Jaktinib 100 mg bid taken orally, not only substantially reduced splenomegaly, but also ameliorated MF-related symptom burdens and anemia. Jaktinib could be a new treatment for patients with anemia after ruxolitinib. Keywords: Janus Kinase inhibitor, Myeloproliferative disorder, Phase II, Myelofibrosis
A phase I trial of pevonedistat in combination with ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Tim Kong,Nicole Gaudin,Karyn Gordon,Maggie J. Cox,Amy W. Zhou,Stephen T. Oh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207241237607

2024-01-01

Therapeutic Advances in Hematology

Abstract:Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib have become standard-of-care therapy for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs); however, activation of alternate oncogenic pathways including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) has limited durable response as single-agent therapy. With the rationale of targeting both pathways, we conducted a phase I dose escalation trial of pevonedistat in combination with ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (NCT03386214). The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with additional objectives of treatment efficacy and alterations of biomarkers. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed with most adverse events being limited to grades 1/2. In secondary measures, anemia response was observed in two patients. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and iron parameters were longitudinally assessed, which revealed suppression of interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma in a dose-dependent manner across a subset of patients. These results suggest that combination therapy targeting both JAK2 and NFκB may hold clinical merit for MPN patients.

hematology
Comprehensive profiling of clinical JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Tim Kong,LaYow Yu,Angelo B A Laranjeira,Daniel A C Fisher,Fan He,Maggie J Cox,Stephen T Oh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26935

Abstract:Small molecule inhibitors targeting JAK2 provide symptomatic benefits for myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients and are among first-line therapeutic agents. However, despite all having potent capacity to suppress JAK-STAT signaling, they demonstrate distinct clinical profiles suggesting contributory effects in targeting other ancillary pathways. Here, we performed comprehensive profiling on four JAK2 inhibitors either FDA-approved (ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib) or undergoing phase 3 studies (momelotinib) to better outline mechanistic and therapeutic efficacy. Across JAK2-mutant in vitro models, all four inhibitors demonstrated similar anti-proliferative phenotypes, whereas pacritinib yielded greatest potency on suppressing colony formation in primary samples, while momelotinib exhibited unique erythroid colony formation sparing. All inhibitors reduced leukemic engraftment, disease burden, and extended survival across patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, with strongest effects elicited by pacritinib. Through RNA-sequencing and gene set enrichment analyses, differential suppressive degrees of JAK-STAT and inflammatory response signatures were revealed, which we validated with signaling and cytokine suspension mass cytometry across primary samples. Lastly, we assessed the capacity of JAK2 inhibitors to modulate iron regulation, uncovering potent suppression of hepcidin and SMAD signaling by pacritinib. These comparative findings provide insight into the differential and beneficial effects of ancillary targeting beyond JAK2 and may help guide the use of specific inhibitors in personalized therapy.
Growth and growth hormone. II. A comparison of isolated growth-hormone deficiency and multiple pituitary-hormone deficiencies in 35 patients with idiopathic hypopituitary dwarfism.

H. Goodman,M. Grumbach,S. Kaplan

IF: 158.5

New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract:
SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Choosing and Properly Using a JAK Inhibitor in Myelofibrosis

Michael J. Hochman,Colin A. Vale,Anthony M. Hunter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2024.09.001

2024-09-14

Abstract:Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloid neoplasm characterized by myeloproliferation, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms related to pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling. Biologically, MF is characterized by constitutive activation of JAK-STAT signaling; accordingly, JAK inhibitors have been rationally developed to treat MF. Following the initial approval of ruxolitinib in 2011, three additional agents have been approved: fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib. As these therapies are non-curative, allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains a key treatment modality and patients with MF who are deemed candidates should be referred to a transplant center. This potentially curative but toxic approach is typically reserved for patients with higher-risk disease, and JAK inhibitors are recommended in the pre-transplant setting. JAK inhibitors have proven effective at managing splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms and should be started early in the disease course in patients presenting with these clinical manifestations; asymptomatic patients may initially be followed with close surveillance. Drug-related myelosuppression has been a challenge with initial JAK inhibitors, particularly in patients presenting with a cytopenic phenotype. However, newer agents, namely pacritinib and momelotinib, have proven more effective in this setting and are approved for patients with significant thrombocytopenia and anemia, respectively. Resistance or disease progression is clinically challenging and may be defined by several possible events, such as increasing splenomegaly or progression to accelerated or blast phase disease. However, with multiple JAK inhibitors now approved, sequencing of these agents appears poised to improve outcomes. Additionally, novel JAK inhibitors and JAK inhibitor-based combinations are in clinical development.

oncology,hematology
Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: Impact on hierarchy of treatment choices

Ayalew Tefferi,Animesh Pardanani,Naseema Gangat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27163

IF: 13.265

2024-01-02

American Journal of Hematology

Abstract:Abstract The primary objective of treatment in myelofibrosis (MF) is prolongation of life, which is currently accomplished only by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Determination of optimal timing for AHSCT is facilitated by molecular risk stratification. Non‐transplant treatment options in MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi): momelotinib (FDA approved on September 15, 2023), ruxolitinib (November 16, 2011), fedratinib (August 16, 2019), and pacritinib (February 28, 2022); all four JAKi are effective in reducing spleen size and alleviating symptoms, considered a drug class effect and attributed to their canonical JAK–STAT inhibitory mechanism of action. In addition, momelotinib exhibits erythropoietic effect, attributed to alleviation of ineffective erythropoiesis through inhibition of activin A receptor type‐I (ACVR1). In transplant‐ineligible or deferred patients, the order of treatment preference is based on specific symptoms and individual assessment of risk tolerance. Because of drug‐induced immunosuppression and other toxicities attributed to JAKi, we prefer non‐JAKi drugs as initial treatment for MF‐associated anemia that is not accompanied by treatment‐requiring splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms. Otherwise, it is reasonable to consider momelotinib as the first‐line JAKi treatment of choice, in order to target the triad of quality‐of‐life offenders in MF: anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms/cachexia. For second‐line therapy, we favor ruxolitinib, over fedratinib, based on toxicity profile. Pacritinib and fedratinib provide alternative options in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia or ruxolitinib‐resistance/intolerance, respectively. Splenectomy remains a viable option for drug‐resistant symptomatic splenomegaly and cytopenia.

hematology
The Variation in the Traits Ameliorated by Inhibitors of JAK1/2, TGF-β, P-Selectin, and CXCR1/CXCR2 in the Gata1low Model Suggests That Myelofibrosis Should Be Treated by These Drugs in Combination

Francesca Gobbo,Fabrizio Martelli,Antonio Di Virgilio,Elena Demaria,Giuseppe Sarli,Anna Rita Migliaccio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147703

IF: 5.6

2024-07-14

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract:Studies conducted on animal models have identified several therapeutic targets for myelofibrosis, the most severe of the myeloproliferative neoplasms. Unfortunately, many of the drugs which were effective in pre-clinical settings had modest efficacy when tested in the clinic. This discrepancy suggests that treatment for this disease requires combination therapies. To rationalize possible combinations, the efficacy in the Gata1low model of drugs currently used for these patients (the JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib) was compared with that of drugs targeting other abnormalities, such as p27kip1 (Aplidin), TGF-β (SB431542, inhibiting ALK5 downstream to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling and TGF-β trap AVID200), P-selectin (RB40.34), and CXCL1 (Reparixin, inhibiting the CXCL1 receptors CXCR1/2). The comparison was carried out by expressing the endpoints, which had either already been published or had been retrospectively obtained for this study, as the fold change of the values in the corresponding vehicles. In this model, only Ruxolitinib was found to decrease spleen size, only Aplidin and SB431542/AVID200 increased platelet counts, and with the exception of AVID200, all the inhibitors reduced fibrosis and microvessel density. The greatest effects were exerted by Reparixin, which also reduced TGF-β content. None of the drugs reduced osteopetrosis. These results suggest that future therapies for myelofibrosis should consider combining JAK1/2 inhibitors with drugs targeting hematopoietic stem cells (p27Kip1) or the pro-inflammatory milieu (TGF-β or CXCL1).

biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary

[Hydrops fetalis. Questions of pre- and postnatal diagnosis and pathogenesis].

New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis: phase II & III clinical trials

New Treatments for Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis Drug Development through the Decade: Novel JAK Inhibitors

[Development of novel therapeutic agents for myelofibrosis]

Ruxolitinib/nilotinib Cotreatment Inhibits Leukemia-Propagating Cells in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL.

P1033: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were refractory or relapsed to ruxolitinib: a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study

Momelotinib (JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor): mechanism of action, clinical trial reports, and therapeutic prospects beyond myelofibrosis

Ten years after ruxolitinib approval for myelofibrosis: a review of clinical efficacy

How I individualize selection of JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis

Identification of bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP9) as a novel profibrotic factor in vitro.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for myelofibrosis: what is the current state of play?

Experimental therapeutics for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasias

P1021: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were intolerant to ruxolitinib: an open-label, single-arm phase 2b study

A phase I trial of pevonedistat in combination with ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Comprehensive profiling of clinical JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Growth and growth hormone. II. A comparison of isolated growth-hormone deficiency and multiple pituitary-hormone deficiencies in 35 patients with idiopathic hypopituitary dwarfism.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Choosing and Properly Using a JAK Inhibitor in Myelofibrosis

Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: Impact on hierarchy of treatment choices

The Variation in the Traits Ameliorated by Inhibitors of JAK1/2, TGF-β, P-Selectin, and CXCR1/CXCR2 in the Gata1low Model Suggests That Myelofibrosis Should Be Treated by These Drugs in Combination