Growth and growth hormone. II. A comparison of isolated growth-hormone deficiency and multiple pituitary-hormone deficiencies in 35 patients with idiopathic hypopituitary dwarfism.

H. Goodman,M. Grumbach,S. Kaplan

IF: 158.5

New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in Asian patients with myelofibrosis.

Chul Won Jung,Lee-Yung Shih,Zhijian Xiao,Jin Jie,Hsin-An Hou,Xin Du,Ming-Chung Wang,Seonyang Park,Ki-Seong Eom,Kenji Oritani,Shinichiro Okamoto,Tetsuzo Tauchi,Jin Seok Kim,Daobin Zhou,Shigeki Saito,Junmin Li,Hiroshi Handa,Li Jianyong,Kohshi Ohishi,Ming Hou,Wu Depei,Katsuto Takenaka,Ting Liu,Yu Hu,Taro Amagasaki,Kazuo Ito,Prashanth Gopalakrishna,Koichi Akashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.969260

2015-01-01

Leukemia & Lymphoma

Abstract:Myelofibrosis is characterized by progressive cytopenias, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly and severe constitutional symptoms. In the phase 3 Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment (COMFORT) studies, ruxolitinib, a potent Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/JAK2 inhibitor, provided substantial improvements in splenomegaly, symptoms, quality-of-life measures and overall survival compared with placebo or best available therapy. No assessments of the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib have been conducted in Asian patients. Here, we describe results from an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial evaluating ruxolitinib in Asian patients with myelofibrosis (n = 120). The primary endpoint was met, with 31.7% of patients achieving a >= 35% reduction from baseline spleen volume at week 24. As measured by the 7-day Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0, 49% of patients achieved a >= 50% reduction from baseline in total symptom score. Adverse events were consistent with those seen in the COMFORT studies. Ruxolitinib was well tolerated in Asian patients with myelofibrosis and provided substantial reductions in splenomegaly and improvements in symptoms.
Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Asian Patients with Myelofibrosis

Chul Won Jung,Lee-Yung Shih,Zhijian Xiao,Jie Jin,Hsin-An Hou,Xin Du,Ming-Chung Wang,Sang‐Won Park,Ki‐Seong Eom,Kenji Oritani,Shinichiro Okamoto,Tetsuzo Tauchi,Jin Seok Kim,Daobin Zhou,Shigeki Saito,Junmin Li,Hiroshi Handa,Jianyong Li,Kohshi Ohishi,Ming Hou,Depei Wu,Katsuto Takenaka,Ting Liu,Yu Hu,Taro Amagasaki,Kazuo Itô,Prashanth Gopalakrishna,Koichi Akashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.969260

2014-01-01

Abstract:Myelofibrosis is characterized by progressive cytopenias, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly and severe constitutional symptoms. In the phase 3 Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment (COMFORT) studies, ruxolitinib, a potent Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/JAK2 inhibitor, provided substantial improvements in splenomegaly, symptoms, quality-of-life measures and overall survival compared with placebo or best available therapy. No assessments of the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib have been conducted in Asian patients. Here, we describe results from an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial evaluating ruxolitinib in Asian patients with myelofibrosis (n = 120). The primary endpoint was met, with 31.7% of patients achieving a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline spleen volume at week 24. As measured by the 7-day Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0, 49% of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in total symptom score. Adverse events were consistent with those seen in the COMFORT studies. Ruxolitinib was well tolerated in Asian patients with myelofibrosis and provided substantial reductions in splenomegaly and improvements in symptoms.
P1033: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were refractory or relapsed to ruxolitinib: a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study

Yi Zhang,Qi-Ke Zhang,Qingchi Liu,Hui-Bing Dang,Sujun Gao,Wei Wang,Hu Zhou,Yuqing Chen,Liangming Ma,Jishi Wang,Peng Zhao,Haiping Yang,Qiu Zhao,Shanshan Suo,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000971028.48500.0d

2023-01-01

HemaSphere

Abstract:Topic: 16. Myeloproliferative neoplasms - Clinical Background: Currently, the only marketed Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis in China is Ruxolitinib, which demonstrated symptomatic and splenic benefit despite of exacerbated cytopenias. However, it is reported that at least 50% of patients treated with ruxolitinib could develop resistance or intolerance during the long-term follow up, for whom the life expectancy is largely reduced. There are limited therapeutic options available after ruxolitinib failure. Jaktinib, an oral novel JAK and AVCR1 inhibitor showed promising results in patients with intermediate or high risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Aims: We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate jaktinib in patients who were refractory or relapsed to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Methods: Patients who had primary, post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis and were previously treated with ruxolitinib for at least 3 months and with either inadequate efficacy response (defined as <10% spleen volume reduction [SVR] by MRI/CT or <30% decrease in spleen size by palpation from baseline) or spleen regrowth to <10% SVR or <30% decrease in spleen size from baseline following an initial response were recruited to receive jaktinib 100 mg bid. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with SVR ≥35% from baseline (SVR35) at week 24, measured by MRI/CT images and assessed by Independent Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included the best spleen response rate (defined as achieving SVR35 at any time), the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in Myeloproliterative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS), improvement of anemia, safety, etc. Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. The median duration of previous ruxolitinib treatment was 18.6 months. The median baseline TSS was 19.5 (range 1-55), hemoglobin was 101.5 g/L (range 61-149), and platelet count was 159×109/L (range 66-951). Patient baseline characteristics are shown in the Table 1.At week 24, 11 (32.4%) patients achieved SVR35. The best spleen response rate was 38.2% (13/34). The median time to achieve the first SVR35 was 8.1 weeks, and the median duration of response was not reached. At week 24, 13 (46.4%) patients achieved a ≥50% improvement in TSS from baseline. Of 16 transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin ≤100 g/L at baseline, eight (50.0%) had a ≥20 g/L hemoglobin increase by week 24. Of 6 patients who required red blood cell transfusion at baseline, two (33.3%) had a 50% decrease in red blood cell infusion by week 24. The median exposure time of jaktinib was 231 days (range 96-371). Twenty three (67.6%) patients had one or more grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia (32.4%, n=11), thrombocytopenia (32.4%, n=11), leukocytosis (20.6%, n=7) and leukopenia (11.8%, n=4). A dose reduction or temporary interruption due to TEAEs were reported in 9 (26.5%) patients. Treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 2 (5.9%) patients. Summary/Conclusion: Jaktinib is effective and well tolerated in myelofibrosis patients who were refractory/relapsed to ruxolitinib. Jaktinib not only substantially improves splenomegaly, but also reduces myelofibrosis-related symptoms. Therefore, jaktinib could become a new treatment option for those patients failed to ruxolitinib. Keywords: Myelofibrosis, Phase II, Myeloproliferative disorder, Janus Kinase inhibitor
Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Lower Risk Myelofibrosis: A Single-Arm, Exploratory and Prospective Study.

Shiwei Hu,Xiudi Yang,Hongyan Tong,Jie Jin,Jian Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6573

IF: 45.3

2024-01-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:6573 Background: The COMFORT studies assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-2 and high risk myelofibrosis (MF), and JUMP study has broadened the investigation including patients with intermediate-1 MF in the classification of DIPSS. However, there have been limited prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of patients with low risk MF in the classification of more comprehensive scoring system. Here we present a single-arm, exploratory and prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with lower risk MF in China. Methods: Lower risk was defined as MIPSS-70 ≤ 3, MIPSS+V2.0 ≤ 3, DIPSS-Plus ≤ 1, DIPSS ≤ 2 or MYSEC-PM < 14 according to the expert guidelines. Patients aged ≥ 18 with overt primary myelofibrosis (overt-PMF), prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF), classified as lower risk were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a spleen length reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline at week 48. Secondary endpoints included the best spleen response, the proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction in Total Symptom Score (TSS50) and safety. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the lower risk group, including 7 pre-PMF, 17 overt-PMF, 8 PPV-MF, and 8 PET-MF patients. The median age was 62.0 years. 32 (80%) were JAK2V617F positive. 16 patients had next generation sequencing (NGS), the most frequent non-driver mutation was in TET2 (43.8%), followed by BCOR (12.5%). By week 48, 26 (65.0%) patients achieved a ≥ 50% decrease in palpable spleen length. 32 (80.0%) patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline at any time. The median time to a spleen response was 4.3 weeks. The TSS50 rates at week 48 was 25%. No patients required red blood cell transfusion at baseline. And only 1 patient had a baseline hemoglobin (HB) <100 g/L, which remained stable during the follow-up process. The most common grade ≥ 3 hematological treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (10.0%) and thrombocytopenia (2.5%). 6 (15.0%) and 15 (37.5%) patients experienced grade 1 or 2 anemia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. The mostly common non-hematological TEAEs was infection (12.5), including upper respiratory tract infection (7.5%), urinary infection (2.5%), fever (2.5%), predominantly of grade 1 or 2. Of note, 1 patient developed staphylococcal sepsis and 1 patient experienced acute renal failure. No one discontinued ruxolitinib treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Ruxolitinib is an effective treatment for patients with intermediate-1 and low risk MF, resulting in improved spleen and symptom responses, along with fewer hematological and non-hematological TEAEs. This trial was registered as ChiCTR2200064250 at ClinicalTrials.gov . Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200064250.
Safety and Efficacy of Jaktinib in the Treatment of Janus Kinase Inhibitor‐naïve Patients with Myelofibrosis: Results of a Phase II Trial

Yi Zhang,Hu Zhou,Zhongxing Jiang,Dengshu Wu,Junling Zhuang,Wei Li,Qian Jiang,Xiuli Wang,Jinwen Huang,Huanling Zhu,Linhua Yang,Xin Du,Fei Li,Ruixiang Xia,Feng Zhang,Jianda Hu,Yan Li,Yu Hu,Jing Liu,Chenghao Jin,Kai Sun,Zeping Zhou,Liqing Wu,Wenjuan Yu,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26709

IF: 13.265

2022-01-01

American Journal of Hematology

Abstract:Myelofibrosis (MF) is associated with several constitutional symptoms. Currently, there are few therapeutic options for MF. Jaktinib, a novel, small-molecule inhibitor of JAK, is currently being studied for its potential to treat MF. This phase 2 trial investigated efficacy and safety of jaktinib in the treatment of MF patients. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with >= 35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35, proportion of patients with >= 35% reduction in spleen volume) at week 24. The secondary end points included improvement of anemia, rates of symptom response, and safety profile. Between January 8, 2019 and August 29, 2020, 118 patients were recruited and treated with either jaktinib 100 mg BID or 200 mg QD. At week 24, 54.8% (34/62) of patients in the 100 mg BID group and 31.3% (15/48) in the 200 mg QD group achieved SVR35 (p = .0199). Jaktinib treatment increased hemoglobin level to >= 20 g/L in 35.6% (21/59) of patients with hemoglobin <= 100 g/L at baseline. The proportion of patients who achieved a >= 50% improvement in total symptom score at week 24 was 69.6% (39/56) in the BID group and 57.5% (23/40) in the QD group. The most common >= grade 3 hematological treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; >= 10%) were anemia (100 mg BID: 24.2%, 200 mg QD: 28.8%), thrombocytopenia (16.7%, 11.5%), and neutropenia (3.0%, 11.5%). All non-hematological TEAEs were mild. These results indicate that jaktinib can shrink the spleen, improve anemia, and other clinical symptoms with good tolerability.
Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: Impact on hierarchy of treatment choices

Ayalew Tefferi,Animesh Pardanani,Naseema Gangat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27163

IF: 13.265

2024-01-02

American Journal of Hematology

Abstract:Abstract The primary objective of treatment in myelofibrosis (MF) is prolongation of life, which is currently accomplished only by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Determination of optimal timing for AHSCT is facilitated by molecular risk stratification. Non‐transplant treatment options in MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi): momelotinib (FDA approved on September 15, 2023), ruxolitinib (November 16, 2011), fedratinib (August 16, 2019), and pacritinib (February 28, 2022); all four JAKi are effective in reducing spleen size and alleviating symptoms, considered a drug class effect and attributed to their canonical JAK–STAT inhibitory mechanism of action. In addition, momelotinib exhibits erythropoietic effect, attributed to alleviation of ineffective erythropoiesis through inhibition of activin A receptor type‐I (ACVR1). In transplant‐ineligible or deferred patients, the order of treatment preference is based on specific symptoms and individual assessment of risk tolerance. Because of drug‐induced immunosuppression and other toxicities attributed to JAKi, we prefer non‐JAKi drugs as initial treatment for MF‐associated anemia that is not accompanied by treatment‐requiring splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms. Otherwise, it is reasonable to consider momelotinib as the first‐line JAKi treatment of choice, in order to target the triad of quality‐of‐life offenders in MF: anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms/cachexia. For second‐line therapy, we favor ruxolitinib, over fedratinib, based on toxicity profile. Pacritinib and fedratinib provide alternative options in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia or ruxolitinib‐resistance/intolerance, respectively. Splenectomy remains a viable option for drug‐resistant symptomatic splenomegaly and cytopenia.

hematology
Momelotinib (JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor): mechanism of action, clinical trial reports, and therapeutic prospects beyond myelofibrosis

Ayalew Tefferi,Animesh Pardanani,Naseema Gangat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.282612

2023-03-03

Haematologica

Abstract:Janus kinase 2 inhibitors (JAKi) are now part of the therapeutic armamentarium for primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF). Patients with MF endure shortened survival and poor quality of life (QoL). Allogeneic stem cell transplant is currently the only treatment modality in MF with the potential to cure the disease or prolong survival. By contrast, current drug therapy in MF targets QoL and does not modify the natural history of the disease. The discovery of JAK2 and other JAK-STAT activating mutations (i.e., CALR and MPL) in myeloproliferative neoplasms, including MF, has facilitated the development of several JAKi that are not necessarily specific to the oncogenic mutations themselves but proved effective in countering JAK-STAT signaling, resulting in suppression of inflammatory cytokines and myeloproliferation. This non-specific activity resulted in clinically favorable effects on constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly and, consequently, FDA approval of three small molecule JAKi: ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. A fourth JAKi, momelotinib, is poised for FDA approval soon and has been shown to provide additional benefit in alleviating transfusiondependent anemia in MF. The salutary effect of momelotinib on anemia has been attributed to inhibition of activin A receptor, type 1 (ACVR1) and recent information suggests similar effect from pacritinib. ACRV1 mediates SMAD2/3 signalling that contributes to upregulation of hepcidin production and iron-restricted erythropoiesis. Therapeutic targeting of ACRV1 raises therapeutic prospects in other myeloid neoplasms associated with ineffective erythropoiesis, such as myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts or SF3B1 mutation, especially those with co-expression of JAK2 mutation and thrombocytosis.

hematology
Myelofibrosis Drug Development through the Decade: Novel JAK Inhibitors

Ali Younas Khan,Muhammad Junaid Tariq,Muhammad Usman,Awais Ijaz,Abdul Rafae,Mustafa Nadeem Malik,Hafiz Muhammad Fazeel,Nadia Carenina Nunes Cavalcante Parr,Muhammad Asad Fraz,Muhammad Jahanzeb Khalil,Jemin Aby Jose,Seren Durer,Ceren Durer,Faiz Anwer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-115408

IF: 20.3

2018-11-29

Blood

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF), a BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), has an annual incidence of 1 in 100000 for the primary MF and 0.3-0.7 in 100000 for secondary MF in the USA. MF patients have a median survival of 6.5 years. The primary mutation, JAK2V617F, occurs in 40-60% of MF cases. Ruxolotinib, a JAK inhibitor, has been the mainstay in treating high risk, debilitating MF but largely clinical needs are unmet. Methods A comprehensive literature research was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov. We included all trials that were under development in phase I/II/III trials. Our search identified 1642 full-length manuscripts or abstracts with published results in the last decade ( Jan 2007 till Dec 2017) were screened for relevant studies. After screening by 2 independent reviewers, 212 articles were finalized for our final analyses. We have reviewed the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of 2nd generation JAK inhibitors in this review. Results JAK1 inhibitor: Itacitinib reduced total symptom score (TSS) ≥ 50% in 15/42 (36%) patients. Mild gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances and some grade 3-4 myelosuppression (anemia: 33%, thrombocytopenia: 29%) were reported. JAK2 inhibitors: In PERSIST-1, pacritinib when compared to best available therapy (BAT) showed SVR ≥ 35% in 19.1% vs. 4.7% patients, with lower rates of myelosuppression (thrombocytopenia: 17%, anemia: 11%). In PERSIST-2, a phase III trial of pacritinb vs. BAT in patients with baseline cytopenias, similar efficacy was demonstrated (SVR ≥ 35%: 18% vs. 3%). Increasing rates of heart failure and intracranial hemorrhages led to a temporary hold which was lifted in August 2017. Lestaurtinib showed CI in 7 (44%) patients in a phase I trial (n=16) and 6 (27%) patients in a phase II trial (n=22). Most notable toxicities were G 1/2 GI disturbances, anemia occurred in 14% and thrombocytopenia in 23% of patients. In a phase III trial (n=193), fedratinib showed a SVR ≥ 35% and a TSS ≥ 50% in 40% and 36% patients, respectively. However, incidence of significant neurotoxicity and Wernicke's encephalopathy led to its suspension. Similarly, a trial of XL019 was terminated due to emergence of central and peripheral neurotoxicity. In a phase I trial (n=48), NS-018 exhibited a spleen length reduction (SLR) ≥ 50% in 20 (56%) patients along with prompt improvement in bone marrow fibrosis (37%). Anemia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 15% and 27% of patients, respectively. Dizziness (23%) and nausea (19%) were also reported. Gandotinib demonstrated SLR ≥50% in 62% patients, in a phase I trial (n=38). G1 diarrhea (55.3%) and nausea (42.1%) were the most common toxicities. JAK 1/2 inhibitors: SIMPLIFY-1 (S1), a phase III clinical trial (n=432) of momelotinib vs. ruxolotinib in JAK inhibitor-naïve patients, demonstrated non-inferiority for momelotinib, in spleen volume reduction (SVR) ≥ 35% (26.5% vs. 29%; p=0.01). However, SIMPLIFY-2 trial (S2), that compared these two drugs in JAK inhibitor exposed patients did not achieve similar responses with momelotinib (6.7% vs. 5.8%; p=0.90). Interestingly, momelotinib excelled at achieving transfusion independency in both trials (S1: 66.5% vs. 49.3%; p=0.001, S2: 43.3% vs 21.2%; p=0.001). Grade ≥ 3 infections and peripheral neuropathy were the major toxicities noted. These trials were suspended after 89% of patients failed to achieve the primary endpoint of SVR. AZD1480 demonstrated clinical improvement (CI) in four (11%) patients in a phase I trial (n=35). Most common adverse events included grade (G) 1-2 dizziness and anemia. Conclusion Novel JAK pathway inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in MF but safety concerns regarding the hematological (cytopenias) and non-hematological adverse effects needs to be addressed until their use in clinical practice is established. Momelotinib success in achieving anemia related endpoints is note-worthy and should be further explored in this regard. A phase II study [NCT03165734] evaluating pacritinib monotherapy as a second line treatment in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia is ongoing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

hematology
P1021: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were intolerant to ruxolitinib: an open-label, single-arm phase 2b study

Yi Zhang,Hu Zhou,Zhijian Xiao,Minghui Duan,Sujun Gao,Guangsheng He,Hongmei Jing,Junmin Li,Liangming Ma,Huanling Zhu,Chunkang Chang,Xin Du,Mei Hong,Xin Li,Qingchi Liu,Wei Wang,Nuo Xu,Haiping Yang,Qiu Zhao,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000970984.18863.91

2023-01-01

HemaSphere

Abstract:Topic: 16. Myeloproliferative neoplasms - Clinical Background: As the first approved Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) for patients with symptomatic myelofibrosis (MF), ruxolitinib showed superiority in spleen volume reduction with increased anemia and thrombocytopenia. However, there are few treatment options after ruxolitinib intolerance. Jaktinib, an oral novel JAK and ACVR1 inhibitor showed promising efficacy in JAKi-naïve patients with intermediate or high risk MF with mild side effects. Aims: We conducted a single-arm phase 2b study to evaluate jaktinib in MF patients who were intolerant to ruxolitinib. Here we present the results of the cohort of patients who received jaktinib 100 mg twice a day. Methods: Patients who had primary, post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia MF and were previously treated with ruxolitinib for ≥28 days who either required red blood cell (RBC) transfusions or required more frequent transfusions on ruxolitinib, or had grade 3/4 anemia, thrombocytopenia or hematoma when receiving ruxolitinib, and with palpable spleen ≥5 cm were included. Patients were excluded from the study if they had received ruxolitinib ≥20 mg Bid for at least three months and were refractory or relapsed to ruxolitinib. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline (SVR35) at week 24, assessed by Independent Review Committee on the basis of MRI/CT images. Secondary endpoints included the best spleen response rate (defined as achieving SVR35 at any time), the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in MPN Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS), anemia response, safety, etc. Results: In the full analysis set for efficacy, a total of 44 patients received jaktinib 100 mg twice daily and had completed the 24-week treatments and evaluations or terminated prior to week 24. In addition, one patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis due to incorrect diagnosis of MF but included in the safety analysis. The median baseline TSS was 9.5, hemoglobin was 80 g/L, and platelet count was 132.5×109/L. Patient baseline characteristics are summarized in the Table 1. While on ruxolitinib, 21 patients (47.7%) required RBC transfusion and all patients experienced grade 3/4 anemia, thrombocytopenia or both.The SVR35 rate at week 24 was 43.2% (19/44). Over the study phase, the best spleen response rate was 54.5% (24/44). The median time to achieve the first SVR35 was 12.1 weeks. Spleen response was maintained in 80.4% patients for at least 24 weeks and median duration was not reached. At week 24, 61.8% of the evaluable patients achieved a ≥50% improvement in TSS from baseline. Of 31 transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin ≤100 g/L at baseline, 13 (41.9%) had an increase of hemoglobin ≥20 g/L by week 24. Of 19 patients who required RBC transfusion at baseline, 11 (57.9%) had a 50% decrease in RBC infusion frequency by week 24. Of nine transfusion-dependent patients at baseline, one became transfusion-independent by week 24. In the safety set (n=45), the median jaktinib exposure time was 280 days. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (31.1%, n=14), thrombocytopenia (22.2%, n=10), pneumonia (17.8%, n=8), neutropenia (15.6%, n=7) and leukopenia (15.6%, n=7). Treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in five patients (11.1%). A dose reduction or temporary interruption due to TEAEs were reported in 12 patients (26.7%). Summary/Conclusion: Jaktinib demonstrated promising therapeutic activities in MF patients intolerant to ruxolitinib. Jaktinib 100 mg bid taken orally, not only substantially reduced splenomegaly, but also ameliorated MF-related symptom burdens and anemia. Jaktinib could be a new treatment for patients with anemia after ruxolitinib. Keywords: Janus Kinase inhibitor, Myeloproliferative disorder, Phase II, Myelofibrosis
Isolation and characterization of heat-stable allergens from shrimp (Penaeus indicus).

Sunil Nagpal,Sunil Nagpal,Lekha Rajappa,Lekha Rajappa,Dean D. Metcalfe,D. D. Metcalfe,P. V. S. Rao,P. V. S. Rao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(89)90474-0

IF: 14.29

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract:
SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Choosing and Properly Using a JAK Inhibitor in Myelofibrosis

Michael J. Hochman,Colin A. Vale,Anthony M. Hunter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2024.09.001

2024-09-14

Abstract:Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloid neoplasm characterized by myeloproliferation, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms related to pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling. Biologically, MF is characterized by constitutive activation of JAK-STAT signaling; accordingly, JAK inhibitors have been rationally developed to treat MF. Following the initial approval of ruxolitinib in 2011, three additional agents have been approved: fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib. As these therapies are non-curative, allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains a key treatment modality and patients with MF who are deemed candidates should be referred to a transplant center. This potentially curative but toxic approach is typically reserved for patients with higher-risk disease, and JAK inhibitors are recommended in the pre-transplant setting. JAK inhibitors have proven effective at managing splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms and should be started early in the disease course in patients presenting with these clinical manifestations; asymptomatic patients may initially be followed with close surveillance. Drug-related myelosuppression has been a challenge with initial JAK inhibitors, particularly in patients presenting with a cytopenic phenotype. However, newer agents, namely pacritinib and momelotinib, have proven more effective in this setting and are approved for patients with significant thrombocytopenia and anemia, respectively. Resistance or disease progression is clinically challenging and may be defined by several possible events, such as increasing splenomegaly or progression to accelerated or blast phase disease. However, with multiple JAK inhibitors now approved, sequencing of these agents appears poised to improve outcomes. Additionally, novel JAK inhibitors and JAK inhibitor-based combinations are in clinical development.

oncology,hematology
How I individualize selection of JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis

Lucia Masarova,Helen T Chifotides

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2023022415

IF: 20.3

2024-10-03

Blood

Abstract:The advent of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) inaugurated a novel era in the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Four JAKi have been approved for intermediate or high-risk MF, in the US. Regulatory approval of the first JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, in 2011 transformed the landscape of MF by markedly controlling splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, improving patients' lives, and prolonging survival. Fedratinib, the second...

hematology
New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Prithviraj Bose,Mansour Alfayez,Srdan Verstovsek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-019-0604-y

2019-01-24

Abstract:Seven years after the approval of the Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib, it remains the only drug licensed for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Patients who discontinue ruxolitinib have a dismal outcome, and this is, therefore, an area of significant unmet need. Given the central role that JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) activation plays in disease pathogenesis, there have been many other JAK inhibitors tested, but most have been abandoned, for a variety of reasons. The JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib has recently been resurrected, and there has been a resurgence of interest in the failed JAK1/2 inhibitor momelotinib, which possibly improves anemia. Pacritinib, a non-myelosuppressive JAK2-selective inhibitor, is currently in a dose-ranging study mandated by regulatory authorities. A plethora of other targeted agents, most backed by preclinical data, are in various stages of investigation. These include epigenetic and immune therapies, agents targeting cellular survival, metabolic and apoptotic pathways, the cell cycle, DNA repair, and protein folding and degradation, among others. However, at this time, none of these is close to registration or even in a pivotal trial, illustrating the difficulties in recapitulating the clinical disease in preclinical models. Most current clinical trials are testing the addition of a novel agent to ruxolitinib, either in the frontline setting or in the context of an insufficient response to ruxolitinib, or attempting to study new drugs in the second-line, "ruxolitinib failure" setting. Emerging data supports the addition of azacitidine to ruxolitinib in some patients. Other strategies have focused on improving cytopenias, through amelioration of bone marrow fibrosis or other mechanisms. This is important, because cytopenias are the commonest reason for ruxolitinib interruption and/or dose reduction, and dose optimization of ruxolitinib is tied to its survival benefit. The activin receptor ligand trap, sotatercept, and the anti-fibrotic agent, PRM-151, have shown promise in this regard.
Efficacy, Safety, and Survival Findings after Long-Term Follow-up from ZGJAK002, a Phase 2 Study Comparing Jaktinib 100 Mg Twice Daily with 200 Mg Once Daily for Myelofibrosis (MF)

Yi Zhang,Hu Zhou,Zhongxing Jiang,Dengshu Wu,Junling Zhuang,Wei Li,Qian Jiang,Xiuli Wang,Jinwen Huang,Huanling Zhu,Linhua Yang,Xin Du,Fei Li,Ruixiang Xia,Feng Zhang,Jianda Hu,Yan Li,Yu Hu,Jing Liu,Chenghao Jin,Kai Sun,Zeping Zhou,Shanshan Suo,Wenjuan Yu,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-179043

IF: 13.265

2024-01-01

American Journal of Hematology

Abstract:Jaktinib, a novel JAK and ACVR1 inhibitor, has exhibited promising results in treating patients with myelofibrosis (MF). ZGJAK002 is a Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of jaktinib 100 mg BID (N = 66) and 200 mg QD (N = 52) in JAK inhibitor-naive patients with intermediate- or high-risk MF. We herein present the long-term data with a median follow-up of 30.7 months. At data cutoff, 30.3% of patients in 100 mg BID and 28.8% in 200 mg QD were still continuing their treatment. The 100 mg BID group displayed a numerically higher best spleen response compared with the 200 mg QD group (69.7% vs. 46.2%), with 50.4% from the BID and 51.2% from the QD group maintaining spleen responses over 120 weeks. The 36-month survival rates were 78.2% in BID and 73.6% in QD group. The tolerability of jaktinib remained well, and common grade ≥3 adverse drug reactions included anemia (15.2% vs. 21.2%), thrombocytopenia (15.2% vs. 11.5%), and infectious pneumonia (10.6% vs. 1.9%) in BID and QD groups, respectively. By comparing the two groups, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were similar, except for drug-related serious AEs (24.2% vs. 9.6%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (15.2% vs. 7.7%), which were higher in BID group. The percentages of AEs resulting in death were comparable, with 6.1% in BID and 5.8% in QD group. These analyses further support the long-term durable efficacy and acceptable safety of jaktinib at 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD doses for treating MF.
S212: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF JAKTINIB VERSUS HYDROXYUREA IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-2 OR HIGH RISK MYELOFIBROSIS

Yi Zhang,Hu Zhou,Junling Zhuang,Aili He,Yarong LI,Linhua Yang,Xin Du,Sujun Gao,Guangsheng He,Mei Hong,Qian Jiang,Zhongxing Jiang,Sun Kai,Lingling Yue,Cuiping Zheng,Zeping Zhou,Chenghao Jin,Hongmei Jing,Lin Liu,Qingchi Liu,Jishi Wang,Wen Wu,Yajing Xu,Dengshu Wu,Na Xu,Feng Zhang,Jin Zhang,Huanling Zhu,Zhijian Xiao,Jie Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000967760.70775.53

2023-01-01

HemaSphere

Abstract:Background: Ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea are recommended by Chinese myelofibrosis guideline for splenomegaly. There is an unmet need for new treatments. Jaktinib, a novel JAK and AVCR1 inhibitor, showed promising activity on splenomegaly, anemia, and myelofibrosis symptoms in a phase 2 study (NCT03886415). Aims: This randomized double-blind phase 3 study was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of jaktinib compared to hydroxyurea in patients with intermediate-2 or high risk myelofibrosis. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 with primary, post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) Int-2 or high risk, and no prior or ≤10 days' treatment with a JAK inhibitor were enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive jaktinib 100 mg bid plus hydroxyurea placebo or hydroxyurea 0.5 g bid plus jaktinib placebo, stratified by DIPSS risk status (Int-2 or high risk). One interim analysis was pre-specified to be conducted when the 70 patients completed the 24-week treatment or met the criteria for the treatment termination before week 24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline (SVR35) at week 24, measured by MRI/CT images and assessed by Independent Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included the best spleen response rate (defined as achieving SVR35 at any time), the proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score (TSS50), improvement of anemia, safety, etc. Results: This interim analysis (data cut-off: April 8, 2022) included 47 patients receiving jaktinib and 23 receiving hydroxyurea. 66.0% (jaktinib) and 69.6% (hydroxyurea) had a baseline hemoglobin <100 g/L. 59.6% (jaktinib) and 69.6% (hydroxyurea) were JAK2V617F positive. Patient baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two arms (Table 1). The SVR35 rates at week 24 were 72.3% for jaktinib vs. 17.4% for hydroxyurea (p≤0.0001). Jaktinib showed a consistent spleen response benefit over hydroxyurea across all subgroups analyzed (Figure 1). The best spleen response rates were 80.9% of jaktinib-treat patients vs. 26.1% of hydroxyurea-treated patients (p≤0.0001). The median maximum percentage change from baseline in spleen volume were -46.59% vs. -18.50%. The TSS50 rates at week 24 were 63.8% for jaktinib vs. 43.5% for hydroxyurea (p=0.1163). 5 of 7 jaktinib-treated and two of 5 hydroxyurea-treated patients who required red blood cell transfusion at baseline achieved a ≥50% decrease in red blood cell transfusion by week 24. One of four jaktinib-treated and 0 of three hydroxyurea-treated patients who were transfusion-dependent at baseline changed to transfusion-independent. In transfusion-independent patients with baseline hemoglobin ≤100 g/L, 39.3% for jaktinib and 15.4% for hydroxyurea had a ≥20 g/L hemoglobin increase. The most common grade ≥3 hematological treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (25.5% [jaktinib] vs. 43.5% [hydroxyurea]), thrombocytopenia (17.0% vs. 39.1%), leukopenia (2.1% vs. 21.7%), neutropenia (2.1% vs. 21.7%) and decreased lymphocyte count (2.1% vs. 13.0%). Most common non-hematological TEAEs were upper respiratory tract infection (21.3% vs. 21.7%), elevated bilirubin (12.8% vs. 26.1%), fever (12.8% vs. 21.7%) and diarrhea (10.6% vs. 21.7%), predominantly of grade 1 or 2. TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 8.5% of jaktinib and 17.4% of hydroxyurea.Summary/Conclusion: Jaktinib demonstrated significant clinical benefits over hydroxyurea in myelofibrosis patients for spleen response with improved symptom response and less cytopenias. Jaktinib may be a new treatment option for myelofibrosis patients, especially for those with anemia. Keywords: Myeloproliferative disorder, Myelofibrosis, Janus Kinase inhibitor, Phase III
[Development of novel therapeutic agents for myelofibrosis]

Hiroki Yamaguchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11406/rinketsu.64.1298

Abstract:Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative tumor with a poor prognosis that not only impairs the quality of life because of splenomegaly and debilitating systemic symptoms but also has a high acute myeloid leukemia progression rate. Ruxolitinib, a JAK inhibitor, enhances systemic symptoms in MF and prolongs survival; however, it is not effective in suppressing bone marrow fibrosis and leukemia progression, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains needed for treatment. As a result, many new drugs for MF are presently being developed. Many similar drugs have been demonstrated to enhance therapeutic effectiveness if combined with ruxolitinib, particularly BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitors, bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors, and human double-minute homolog 2 inhibitors, to improve bone marrow fibrosis. This study provides an overview of drugs currently employed in clinical trials being performed in Japan.
Comparative efficacy and hematologic safety of different dosages of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of myelofibrosis: a network meta-analysis

Ke Chen,Yanyu Zhang,Jixuan Zou,Dehao Wang,Xinyue Yu,Yan Sun,Yumeng Li,Jicong Niu,Yi Chen,Pei Zhao,Weiyi Liu,Yan Lv,Mingjing Wang,Xiaomei Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1403967

2024-08-30

Abstract:Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The therapeutic landscape for MF has advanced with the development of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) like ruxolitinib (RUX), fedratinib (FED), pacritinib (PAC), and momelotinib (MMB), aiming to alleviate symptoms and enhance patient comfort. Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of eleven JAKi treatment regimens across nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 2340 participants. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of spleen volume reduction (SVR), total symptom score reduction (TSSR), hematological safety profiles, and overall survival (OS). Results: RUX and MMB were superior in achieving SVR and TSSR, with significant dose-response relationships observed. PAC and MMB were associated with a decreased risk of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia compared to other JAKis. However, no substantial benefits in OS were observed with newer JAKis compared to RUX. The poorer OS outcomes with certain PAC dosages were likely influenced by baseline patient characteristics, particularly severe cytopenias. Conclusion: The introduction of JAKis significantly changed the treatment of MF. This meta-analysis reaffirms the core role of RUX and positions MMB as a potentially powerful alternative for treating symptoms and reducing spleen size. Meanwhile, MMB and PAC have a positive effect on anemia in MF while FED is more tolerable for patients with thrombocytopenia. However, it should be noted that these results are influenced by baseline patient characteristics, particularly cytopenias, which affects both management and overall survival. Therefore, there is an urgent need for personalized dosing strategies to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety, with careful consideration of patient-specific factors. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023424179.
Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis: phase II & III clinical trials

Douglas Tremblay,Ronald Hoffman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2021.2015320

2021-10-02

Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Myelofibrosis is a clonal hematologic malignancy with clinical manifestations that include cytopenias, debilitating constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis and a propensity toward leukemic progression. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative, this therapy is not available for the majority of patients. Ruxolitinib and fedratinib are approved JAK2 inhibitors that have produced meaningful benefits in terms of spleen reduction and symptom improvement, but there remain several unmet needs.AREAS COVERED: We discuss novel therapies based upon published data from phase II or III clinical trials. Specifically, we cover novel JAK inhibitors (momelotinib and pacritinib), and agents that target bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (pelabresib), the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-2/BCL-xL (navitoclax), MDM2 (navtemadlin), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (parsaclisib), or telomerase (imetelstat).EXPERT OPINION: Patients with disease related cytopenias are ineligible for currently approved JAK2 inhibitors. However, momelotinib and pacritinib may be able to fill this void. Novel therapies are being evaluated in the upfront setting to improve the depth and duration of responses with ruxolitinib. Future evaluation of agents must be judged on their potential to modify disease progression, which current JAK2 inhibitors lack. Combination therapy, possibly with an immunotherapeutic agent might serve as key components of future myelofibrosis treatment options.

pharmacology & pharmacy
Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2

Claire N. Harrison,Alessandro M. Vannucchi,Christian Recher,Francesco Passamonti,Aaron T. Gerds,Juan Carlos Hernandez-Boluda,Abdulraheem Yacoub,Shireen Sirhan,Catherine Ellis,Bharat Patel,Bryan Strouse,Uwe Platzbecker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02928-4

2024-07-13

Advances in Therapy

Abstract:Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration.

pharmacology & pharmacy,medicine, research & experimental
[Hydrops fetalis. Questions of pre- and postnatal diagnosis and pathogenesis].

H. Senft,H. Födisch,M. Hansmann

Abstract:

Growth and growth hormone. II. A comparison of isolated growth-hormone deficiency and multiple pituitary-hormone deficiencies in 35 patients with idiopathic hypopituitary dwarfism.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in Asian patients with myelofibrosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Asian Patients with Myelofibrosis

P1033: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were refractory or relapsed to ruxolitinib: a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Lower Risk Myelofibrosis: A Single-Arm, Exploratory and Prospective Study.

Safety and Efficacy of Jaktinib in the Treatment of Janus Kinase Inhibitor‐naïve Patients with Myelofibrosis: Results of a Phase II Trial

Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: Impact on hierarchy of treatment choices

Momelotinib (JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor): mechanism of action, clinical trial reports, and therapeutic prospects beyond myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis Drug Development through the Decade: Novel JAK Inhibitors

P1021: jaktinib in patients with myelofibrosis who were intolerant to ruxolitinib: an open-label, single-arm phase 2b study

Isolation and characterization of heat-stable allergens from shrimp (Penaeus indicus).

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Choosing and Properly Using a JAK Inhibitor in Myelofibrosis

How I individualize selection of JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis

New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Efficacy, Safety, and Survival Findings after Long-Term Follow-up from ZGJAK002, a Phase 2 Study Comparing Jaktinib 100 Mg Twice Daily with 200 Mg Once Daily for Myelofibrosis (MF)

S212: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF JAKTINIB VERSUS HYDROXYUREA IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-2 OR HIGH RISK MYELOFIBROSIS

[Development of novel therapeutic agents for myelofibrosis]

Comparative efficacy and hematologic safety of different dosages of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of myelofibrosis: a network meta-analysis

Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis: phase II & III clinical trials

Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2

[Hydrops fetalis. Questions of pre- and postnatal diagnosis and pathogenesis].