Abstract:Naïve CD4+ Th (T helper cells) can differentiate/be polarized in to 9 terminally differentiated Th cell subsets depending on the cytokine repertoire and anatomical location. CD4+ FOXP3+ (forkhead box P3) regulatory T cells (Treg) are one of the Th subsets. Treg are well known to suppress immuno‐pathological reactions in host immune system against antigens and dangers. Recently we proposed a novel concept, which suggested that pathological conditions re‐shape physiological Treg into pathological Treg that have weakened immuno‐suppressive functions and show increased plasticity. This was substantiated by several reports by demonstrating that there are endogenous mechanisms available to suppress Treg under various pathologies. Furthermore, Th1 like–Treg and Th17 like–Treg have also been reported. However, a comprehensive analysis was not conducted to identify whether Treg can convert into other immune cell types such as APCs (antigen presenting cells) when given the right condition. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an extensive experimental datamining approach. In our study, we analyzed the tissue expression patterns of as many as 61 Th subset regulators in physiological and pathological conditions. Our analysis revealed the following findings. 1) All the Th subset regulators are differentially expressed in various human tissues including heart and vascular tissues at physiological conditions. 2) Chronic metabolic diseases and autoimmune diseases increase multiple Th subset regulators but decrease Treg regulators. Familial hypercholesterolemia and lupus do not increase Th1 regulators. 3) Severe trauma increases Th2, Th9, Tfh, and Th17 subset regulators but decreases Th1 and Treg regulators in blood. In contrast, burn injury decreases all Th subset regulators except Th22 regulators. 4) Vascular cells are functional as innate immune cells, express numerous Th subsets‐promoting cytokines and induce Th regulator expression except the regulators for Treg. 5) Gata3 and Hdac6 promote, but Bcl6 inhibits, Th subset regulator expression in Treg, and regulate Treg plasticity and heterogeneity. 6) Gata3 and Bcl6 inhibit the expression of MHC class II, and T cell co‐signaling receptors in Treg; and consequently mutations of Gata3 and Bcl6 “trans‐differentiate” Treg into APC‐like Treg. Based on our findings, we conclude that increased plasticity of naïve T‐reg under pathological conditions with decreased expression of Gata3 and Bcl6 can upregulate MHC class II molecules and T cell co‐stimulation receptors expression that subsequently convert them to APC like‐Treg. Furthermore, our data suggested that Th subset may have various non‐immune activities as well. Our findings provide novel insights into Th subsets and Treg, which may lead to future development of novel therapeutics for the treatment of inflammation, cancers, transplantation, autoimmune diseases and tissue regeneration.Support or Funding InformationRO1‐HL132399‐01A1This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Do Memory CD4 T Cells Keep Their Cell-Type Programming: Plasticity versus Fate Commitment? Complexities of Interpretation due to the Heterogeneity of Memory CD4 T Cells, Including T Follicular Helper Cells

Regulatory dendritic cells program generation of interleukin-4–producing alternative memory CD4 T cells with suppressive activity

Plasticity of the Murine Spleen T-cell Cholinergic Receptors and Their Role in in Vitro Differentiation of Naïve CD4 T Cells Toward the Th1, Th2 and Th17 Lineages

Precursor central memory versus effector cell fate and naïve CD4+ T cell heterogeneity

Maintaining CD4-CD8 lineage integrity in T cells: where plasticity serves versatility.

Plasticity and lineage commitment of individual T H 1 cells are determined by stable T-bet expression quantities

T-cell development and the CD4–CD8 lineage decision

Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions

CD4+ T cell memory is impaired by species-specific cytotoxic differentiation, but not by TCF-1 loss

A Minimal Regulatory Network of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors Recovers Observed Patterns of CD4+ T Cell Differentiation and Plasticity

A continuum of CD4+ T cell “help” defines Memory B cell fate

Increased Plasticity of FOXP3+ Treg under Pathological Conditions Convert Treg into Either Novel Treg or Th1‐Treg

Heterogeneity and plasticity of the naive CD4+ T cell compartment

Homeostasis-Stimulated Proliferation Drives Naive T Cells to Differentiate Directly into Memory T Cells

Reversible, tunable epigenetic silencing of TCF1 generates flexibility in the T cell memory decision

Lineage relationships, homeostasis, and recall capacities of central– and effector–memory CD8 T cells in vivo

Many Faces of Regulatory T Cells: Heterogeneity or Plasticity?

Histone Methylation Mediates Plasticity of Human Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells by Modulating Signature Gene Expressions

Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets

[The influence of transcription factors on CD4+ T cell differentiation]

Conversion of Effector CD4+ T Cells to a CD8+ MHC II-recognizing Lineage