Abstract:Biological motion perception is a specific type of perceptual organization, during which a clear image of a moving human body is perceptually generated in virtue of certain core light dots representing the major joint movements. While the processes of biological motion perception have been studied extensively for almost a century, there is still a debate on whether biological motion task performance can be equally precise across all visual field or is central visual field specified for biological motion perception. The current study explores the processes of biological motion perception and figure–ground segmentation in the central and peripheral visual field, expanding the understanding of perceptual organization across different eccentricities. The method involved three different tasks of visual grouping: (1) a static visual grouping task, (2) a dynamic visual grouping task, and (3) a biological motion detection task. The stimuli in (1) and (2) were generated from 12–13 dots grouped by proximity and common fate, and, in (3), light dots representing human motion. All stimuli were embedded in static or dynamics visual noise and the threshold value for the number of noise dots in which the elements could still be grouped by proximity and/or common fate was determined. The results demonstrate that biological motion can be differentiated from the scrambled set of moving dots in a more intensive visual noise than static and dynamic visual grouping tasks. Furthermore, in all three visual tasks (static and dynamic grouping, and biological motion detection) the performance was significantly worse in the periphery than in the central visual field, and object magnification could not compensate for the reduced performance in any of the three grouping tasks. The preliminary results of nine participants indicate that (a) human motion perception involves specific perceptual processes, providing the high-accuracy perception of the human body and (b) the processes of figure–ground segmentation are governed by the bottom-up processes and the best performance can be achieved only when the object is demonstrated in the central visual field.

Acute abdomen in children with infected ventriculoperitoneal shunts.

Hierarchical motion perception as causal inference

Self-reference modulates the perception of visual apparent motion

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Perception of opposite-direction motion in random dot kinematograms

Atheromatous Plaques at the Origin of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Describing Local Reference Frames for 3-D Motion Trajectory Recognition

Figure–Ground Segmentation and Biological Motion Perception in Peripheral Visual Field

Different patterns of interleukin-1alpha and interleukin-1beta expression in organs of normal young and old mice.

A paradoxical misperception of relative motion

Attentional Modulation of Speed-Change Perception in the Perifoveal and Near-Peripheral Visual Field

Canada finally begins long journey to an HIV vaccine

Shifts in the Eye-Centered Frame of Reference May Underlie Saccades, Visual Perception, and Eye-Hand Coordination

Scale-Dependent Functions, Stochastic Quantization and Renormalization

Towards Motion Metamers for Foveated Rendering

Object speed perception during lateral visual self-motion

How We See and Recognize Object Motion

Active immunization against gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in Chinese male pigs: effects of dose on antibody titer, hormone levels and sexual development.

Spatial Heterogeneity of Biological Motion Perception

Different extrapolation of moving object locations in perception, smooth pursuit, and saccades

Biological motion perception in the theoretical framework of perceptual decision-making: An event-related potential study