Abstract:Our brains predict future sensory input based on their current beliefs about the world around us, but interpreting prediction errors can be challenging in a volatile environment because they can be caused by stochastic noise or by outdated predictions. Noisy signals should be integrated with prior beliefs to improve precision, but the two should be segregated when environmental changes render prior beliefs irrelevant. Bayesian inference provides a statistically optimal solution to deal with situations in which there is uncertainty about the cause of the prediction errors. However, the method quickly becomes memory intensive and computationally intractable when applied consecutively. Here, we systematically evaluate the predictive performance of Bayesian causal inference for human perceptual decisions in a spatial prediction task based on noisy audiovisual sequences with occasional changepoints. We elucidate the simplifying assumptions of a previously proposed reduced Bayesian observer model, and we compare it to an extensive set of models based on alternative simplification strategies. Model-free analyses revealed the hallmarks of Bayesian causal inference: participants seem to have integrated sensory evidence with prior beliefs to improve accuracy when prediction errors were small, and prior influence gradually decreased as prediction errors grew larger, signalling probable irrelevance of the prior due to a changepoint. Model comparison results further supported the hypotheses that participants computed probability-weighted averages over the causal options (noise or changepoint) and that they iteratively summarized their beliefs while accounting for causal uncertainty akin to the reduced Bayesian observer model. However, we also found that participants' reliance on prior beliefs was systematically smaller than predicted by the model, and this was best explained by individually fitting lower-than-optimal parameters for the a-priori probability of prior relevance. We conclude that perceptual belief updating in volatile environments with stochastic noise is well described by a simplified model of consecutive Bayesian causal inference. Observers utilize priors flexibly to the extent that they are deemed relevant, though also conservatively with a lower tendency to bind than an ideal Bayesian observer.

Hierarchical motion perception as causal inference

Seeing "what" Through "why": Evidence from Probing the Causal Structure of Hierarchical Motion.

Causal inference predicts the transition from integration to segmentation in motion perception

Hierarchical temporal prediction captures motion processing from retina to higher visual cortex

Illusory Movement of Stationary Stimuli in the Visual Periphery: Evidence for a Strong Centrifugal Prior in Motion Processing.

Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion

Unifying account of visual motion and position perception

Adaptive V1-MT Model for Motion Perception

Hierarchical Constraints on the Distribution of Attention in Dynamic Displays

How We See and Recognize Object Motion

Bayesian motion estimation accounts for a surprising bias in 3D vision

Motion-based nearest vector metric for reference frame selection in the perception of motion

Invariant global motion recognition in the dorsal visual system: a unifying theory

A paradoxical misperception of relative motion

Learning to segment self-generated from externally caused optic flow through sensorimotor mismatch circuits

Shared Mechanisms Drive Ocular Following and Motion Perception

Cortical Mechanisms of Multisensory Linear Self-motion Perception

Hierarchical temporal prediction captures motion processing along the visual pathway

Visual Motion Integration for Perception and Pursuit

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments

Integrated Perceptual Decisions Rely on Parallel Evidence Accumulation