Abstract:In the current study we manipulated the relative motion velocity between the observer (self‐motion or SM) and the object (OM) within a stationary scene as a strategy to test how the brain accomplishes object‐motion detection. Here, we demonstrated that three key regions of dorsal visual system, such as MT+, V6+, and V3A, are fundamental to implement such a critical computation since they are modulated by both self‐ and object‐motion velocities and showed a multivoxel pattern reflecting different object‐motion velocities, hence reflecting their possible role in discriminating between distinct velocities of self‐ and object‐motion. We suggest that these egomotion regions may be involved in the complex computation required for detecting scene‐relative object‐motion during self‐motion. The ability to detect and assess world‐relative object‐motion is a critical computation performed by the visual system. This computation, however, is greatly complicated by the observer's movements, which generate a global pattern of motion on the observer's retina. How the visual system implements this computation is poorly understood. Since we are potentially able to detect a moving object if its motion differs in velocity (or direction) from the expected optic flow generated by our own motion, here we manipulated the relative motion velocity between the observer and the object within a stationary scene as a strategy to test how the brain accomplishes object‐motion detection. Specifically, we tested the neural sensitivity of brain regions that are known to respond to egomotion‐compatible visual motion (i.e., egomotion areas: cingulate sulcus visual area, posterior cingulate sulcus area, posterior insular cortex [PIC], V6+, V3A, IPSmot/VIP, and MT+) to a combination of different velocities of visually induced translational self‐ and object‐motion within a virtual scene while participants were instructed to detect object‐motion. To this aim, we combined individual surface‐based brain mapping, task‐evoked activity by functional magnetic resonance imaging, and parametric and representational similarity analyses. We found that all the egomotion regions (except area PIC) responded to all the possible combinations of self‐ and object‐motion and were modulated by the self‐motion velocity. Interestingly, we found that, among all the egomotion areas, only MT+, V6+, and V3A were further modulated by object‐motion velocities, hence reflecting their possible role in discriminating between distinct velocities of self‐ and object‐motion. We suggest that these egomotion regions may be involved in the complex computation required for detecting scene‐relative object‐motion during self‐motion.

Figure–Ground Segmentation and Biological Motion Perception in Peripheral Visual Field

Spatial Heterogeneity of Biological Motion Perception

The neural substrates of biological motion perception: an fMRI study

Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing

Natural scene statistics of figure-ground motion in MT receptive fields

Predictive processing in biological motion perception: Evidence from human behavior

Eye-specific detection and a multi-eye integration model of biological motion perception

A comparison of form processing involved in the perception of biological and nonbiological movements

Biological motion perception in the theoretical framework of perceptual decision-making: An event-related potential study

Visual Motion Integration for Perception and Pursuit

Detecting biological motion signals in human and monkey superior colliculus: a subcortical-cortical pathway for biological motion perception

Neural Correlates of Spatio-Temporal Grouping in Bistable Apparent Motion Perception

Event-based Encoding of Biological Motion and Location in Visual Working Memory.

Motion as a source of environmental information: a fresh view on biological motion computation by insect brains

Neural sensitivity to translational self‐ and object‐motion velocities

Illusory Movement of Stationary Stimuli in the Visual Periphery: Evidence for a Strong Centrifugal Prior in Motion Processing.

Shared Mechanisms Drive Ocular Following and Motion Perception

Structural and effective brain connectivity underlying biological motion detection

In the brain of the beholder: bi-stable motion reveals mesoscopic-scale feedback modulation in V1

Identification of peripheral visual images in a laterally restricted gaze field

Motion-induced blindness shows spatial anisotropies in conscious perception