Abstract:Economic models are meant to provide a framework to describe real-world economic activities. In principle, how well a model performs this task can be evaluated by how close the model's simulated activities track the observed ones. A necessary first step in simulating a model is to choose values for the model's parameters in accordance with actual economic data. A fundamental problem in economic modelling, however, is that actual economic data are sampled at time intervals that are typically longer than the decision intervals of actual economic agents.One popular resolution of this problem is to constrain the length of the decision intervals of theoretical economic agents to be equal to the length of the actual data-sampling intervals. This widely adopted approach makes it feasible to directly calibrate theoretical models to the observed data, but it can introduce substantial biases in the models’ empirical performance, as demonstrated by recent research that has allowed the decision intervals to be shorter than the data-sampling intervals. This alternative, high-frequency modelling approach, however, has brought with itself a fundamental issue that direct calibration of the models’ parameters is no longer feasible. In response, researchers have employed an ad hoc rule to transform commonly chosen lower-frequency parameter values (which can be calibrated directly from the available data) to their high-frequency counterparts.We show in this paper that this standard transformation rule has three major drawbacks. First, it produces internal inconsistencies in steady-state equilibrium conditions. Second, it is sometimes at odds with microeconomic evidence. And third, it can result in inaccurate log-linear approximations to the models’ true equilibrium solutions by worsening the fit of both the transition dynamic coefficients and the point of approximation itself. We present here an alternative, coherent transformation rule for calibrating high-frequency models that directly addresses these three shortcomings. We then use our consistent transformation rule to calibrate high-frequency versions of two well-known economic models and show how it improves these models’ empirical performance.

On Adjusting the One‐Sided Hodrick–Prescott Filter

Successive one-sided Hodrick-Prescott filter with incremental filtering algorithm for nonlinear economic time series

The boosted HP filter is more general than you might think

Characteristic period analysis of the Chinese stock market using successive one-sided HP filter

A robust method to date recessions and compute output gaps: the Portuguese case

Boosted Whittaker–Henderson Graduation

ONE-SIDED TESTING FOR ARCH EFFECTS USING WAVELETS

A new set of asymmetric filters for tracking the short-term trend in real-time

An aggregation-consistent implementation of the Hamilton filter

Rating Transitions Forecasting: A filtering Approach

Numerically Stable Method of Signal Subspace Estimation Based on Multistage Wiener Filter

Real time estimation in local polynomial regression, with application to trend-cycle analysis

H∞filter Design for Discrete Delay Systems: a New Parameter-Dependent Approach

Theory of Evolutionary Spectra for Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Inference in Possibly Misspecified and Nonstationary Models

1 ADVANCES IN HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTRAL ESTIMATION

The Suboptimal Method Via Probabilists’ Hermite Polynomials to Solve Nonlinear Filtering Problems

Robust H2 filtering of phase‐type semi‐Markov jump linear systems with cluster observations

Robust adaptive filtering algorithms based on (inverse)hyperbolic sine function

Estimating HANK with Micro Data

An Extended Kalman Filter Enhanced Hilbert-Huang Transform in Oscillation Detection

Consistent high-frequency calibration