Abstract:Economic models are meant to provide a framework to describe real-world economic activities. In principle, how well a model performs this task can be evaluated by how close the model's simulated activities track the observed ones. A necessary first step in simulating a model is to choose values for the model's parameters in accordance with actual economic data. A fundamental problem in economic modelling, however, is that actual economic data are sampled at time intervals that are typically longer than the decision intervals of actual economic agents.One popular resolution of this problem is to constrain the length of the decision intervals of theoretical economic agents to be equal to the length of the actual data-sampling intervals. This widely adopted approach makes it feasible to directly calibrate theoretical models to the observed data, but it can introduce substantial biases in the models’ empirical performance, as demonstrated by recent research that has allowed the decision intervals to be shorter than the data-sampling intervals. This alternative, high-frequency modelling approach, however, has brought with itself a fundamental issue that direct calibration of the models’ parameters is no longer feasible. In response, researchers have employed an ad hoc rule to transform commonly chosen lower-frequency parameter values (which can be calibrated directly from the available data) to their high-frequency counterparts.We show in this paper that this standard transformation rule has three major drawbacks. First, it produces internal inconsistencies in steady-state equilibrium conditions. Second, it is sometimes at odds with microeconomic evidence. And third, it can result in inaccurate log-linear approximations to the models’ true equilibrium solutions by worsening the fit of both the transition dynamic coefficients and the point of approximation itself. We present here an alternative, coherent transformation rule for calibrating high-frequency models that directly addresses these three shortcomings. We then use our consistent transformation rule to calibrate high-frequency versions of two well-known economic models and show how it improves these models’ empirical performance.

Estimating HANK with Micro Data

Estimation and Inference in Fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck Model with Discrete-Sampled Data∗

Estimation with Aggregate Shocks

Sequential Bayesian inference for agent-based models with application to the Chinese business cycle

Shocks, Frictions, and Inequality in US Business Cycles

Unconventional Monetary Policy According to HANK

Bayesian Inference Via Filtering Equations for Ultrahigh Frequency Data (I): Model and Estimation

Efficient Likelihood-based Estimation Via Annealing for Dynamic Structural Macrofinance Models

Intensive and Extensive Margins of Labor Supply in HANK: Aggregate and Disaggregate Implications

A Fast and Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Market Microstructure Model

Monetary Policy and Heterogeneity: An Analytical Framework

Bayesian Estimation of Dynamic Asset Pricing Models with Informative Observations

Hawkes process model with a time-dependent background rate and its application to high-frequency financial data

Endogenous cycles in heterogeneous agent models: a state-space approach

Estimating the Hawkes process from a discretely observed sample path

Agent Based-Stock Flow Consistent Macroeconomics: Towards a Benchmark Model

Estimating and Testing Long-Run Risk Models: International Evidence

DeepHAM: A Global Solution Method for Heterogeneous Agent Models with Aggregate Shocks

Solving the Diamond–Mortensen–Pissarides model: A hybrid perturbation approach

Consistent high-frequency calibration