Abstract:Economic models are meant to provide a framework to describe real-world economic activities. In principle, how well a model performs this task can be evaluated by how close the model's simulated activities track the observed ones. A necessary first step in simulating a model is to choose values for the model's parameters in accordance with actual economic data. A fundamental problem in economic modelling, however, is that actual economic data are sampled at time intervals that are typically longer than the decision intervals of actual economic agents.One popular resolution of this problem is to constrain the length of the decision intervals of theoretical economic agents to be equal to the length of the actual data-sampling intervals. This widely adopted approach makes it feasible to directly calibrate theoretical models to the observed data, but it can introduce substantial biases in the models’ empirical performance, as demonstrated by recent research that has allowed the decision intervals to be shorter than the data-sampling intervals. This alternative, high-frequency modelling approach, however, has brought with itself a fundamental issue that direct calibration of the models’ parameters is no longer feasible. In response, researchers have employed an ad hoc rule to transform commonly chosen lower-frequency parameter values (which can be calibrated directly from the available data) to their high-frequency counterparts.We show in this paper that this standard transformation rule has three major drawbacks. First, it produces internal inconsistencies in steady-state equilibrium conditions. Second, it is sometimes at odds with microeconomic evidence. And third, it can result in inaccurate log-linear approximations to the models’ true equilibrium solutions by worsening the fit of both the transition dynamic coefficients and the point of approximation itself. We present here an alternative, coherent transformation rule for calibrating high-frequency models that directly addresses these three shortcomings. We then use our consistent transformation rule to calibrate high-frequency versions of two well-known economic models and show how it improves these models’ empirical performance.

An aggregation-consistent implementation of the Hamilton filter

A Regularized High-Dimensional Positive Definite Covariance Estimator with High-Frequency Data

Agent Based-Stock Flow Consistent Macroeconomics: Towards a Benchmark Model

Extracting the Italian output gap: a Bayesian approach

Modeling aggregate investment under financial constraints

Fractional trends and cycles in macroeconomic time series

Staring at Economic Aggregators through Information Lenses

Comprehensive Time-Series Regression Models Using GRETL -- U.S. GDP and Government Consumption Expenditures & Gross Investment from 1980 to 2013

Consistent high-frequency calibration

Model simplification and variable selection: A replication of the UK inflation model by Hendry (2001)

A new set of asymmetric filters for tracking the short-term trend in real-time

Successive one-sided Hodrick-Prescott filter with incremental filtering algorithm for nonlinear economic time series

Intuitive and Reliable Estimates of the Output Gap from a Beveridge-Nelson Filter

Constructing High Frequency Economic Indicators by Imputation

Estimating HANK with Micro Data

Financial-cycle ratios and medium-term predictions of GDP: Evidence from the United States

Pro-cyclical Aggregate R&D: A Comovement Phenomenon

Macro-financial imbalances and cyclical systemic risk dynamics: understanding the factors driving the financial cycle in the presence of non-linearities

A New Look at Cross-Country Aggregation in the Global VAR Approach: Theory and Monte Carlo Simulation

Band-Pass Filtering with High-Dimensional Time Series