Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation

From interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2

Enhanced Protein-Protein Interaction Discovery via AlphaFold-Multimer

Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein-protein interactions

Revealing missing protein-ligand interactions using AlphaFold predictions

AlphaFold-Multimer accurately captures interactions and dynamics of intrinsically disordered protein regions

Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2

Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3

Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein–protein interactions

Dissecting AlphaFolds Capabilities with Limited Sequence Information

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

Generation of a high confidence set of domain-domain interface types to guide protein complex structure predictions by AlphaFold

High-throughput discovery of inhibitory protein fragments with AlphaFold

Unmasking AlphaFold to integrate experiments and predictions in multimeric complexes

Unmasking AlphaFold: integration of experiments and predictions in multimeric complexes

AlphaFold3, a secret sauce for predicting mutational effects on protein-protein interactions

AlphaBridge: tools for the analysis of predicted macromolecular complexes

Prediction of protein interactions is essential for studying biomolecular mechanisms

Bridging the Gap between Sequence and Structure Classifications of Proteins with AlphaFold Models

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold