Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

Generation of a high confidence set of domain-domain interface types to guide protein complex structure predictions by AlphaFold

Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2

Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation

Multi-domain and complex protein structure prediction using inter-domain interactions from deep learning

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

From interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2

AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold

Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants

AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning

Challenges in predicting PROTAC-mediated Protein-Protein Interfaces with AlphaFold

Predicting direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning

Accurate prediction of interfacial residues in two-domain proteins using evolutionary information: implications for three-dimensional modeling

Accurate prediction of protein assembly structure by combining AlphaFold and symmetrical docking

Exploring structural diversity across the protein universe with The Encyclopedia of Domains

AlphaFold illuminates half of the dark human proteins

Distance-AF: Modifying Predicted Protein Structure Models by Alphafold2 with User-Specified Distance Constraints

actifpTM: a refined confidence metric of AlphaFold2 predictions involving flexible regions

Enhanced Protein-Protein Interaction Discovery via AlphaFold-Multimer

Unsupervised domain classification of AlphaFold2-predicted protein structures

Bridging the Gap between Sequence and Structure Classifications of Proteins with AlphaFold Models

Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein-protein interactions