Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein–protein interactions

Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein-protein interactions

Protein complexes in cells by AI‐assisted structural proteomics

Predicting direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning

From interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2

AlphaFold-Multimer predicts cross-kingdom interactions at the plant-pathogen interface

Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation

Enhanced Protein-Protein Interaction Discovery via AlphaFold-Multimer

AlphaBridge: tools for the analysis of predicted macromolecular complexes

AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning

AlphaFold-Multimer accurately captures interactions and dynamics of intrinsically disordered protein regions

Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants

Unmasking AlphaFold to integrate experiments and predictions in multimeric complexes

Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2

Unmasking AlphaFold: integration of experiments and predictions in multimeric complexes

Prediction of protein structure and AI

Prediction of protein interactions is essential for studying biomolecular mechanisms

Protein Complex Structure Prediction Powered by Multiple Sequence Alignments of Interologs from Multiple Taxonomic Ranks and AlphaFold2

Multi-domain and complex protein structure prediction using inter-domain interactions from deep learning

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

Protein structure prediction in the era of AI: Challenges and limitations when applying to in silico force spectroscopy