Abstract:Abstract Background SF-6Dv2, the latest version of SF-6D, has been developed recently, and its measurement properties remain to be evaluated and compared with the EQ-5D-5L. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the measurement properties of the SF-6Dv2 and the EQ-5D-5L in a large-sample health survey among the Chinese population. Methods Data were obtained from the 2020 Health Service Survey in Tianjin, China. Respondents were randomly selected and invited to complete both the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 through face-to-face interviews or self-administration. Health utility values were calculated by the Chinese value sets for the two measures. Ceiling and floor effects were firstly evaluated. Convergent validity and discriminate validity were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation and effect sizes, respectively. The agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Sensitivity was compared using relative efficiency and receiver operating characteristic. Results Among 19,177 respondents (49.3% male, mean age 55.2 years, ranged 18–102 years) included in this study, the mean utility was 0.939 (0.168) for EQ-5D-5L and 0.872 (0.184) for SF-6Dv2. A higher ceiling effect was observed in EQ-5D-5L than in SF-6Dv2 (72.8% vs. 36.1%). The Spearman’s rank correlation (range: 0.30–0.69) indicated an acceptable convergent validity between the dimensions of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2. The SF-6Dv2 showed slightly better discriminative capacities than the EQ-5D-5L (ES: 0.126–2.675 vs. 0.061–2.256). The ICC between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility values of the total sample was 0.780 (p < 0.05). The SF-6Dv2 had 29.0–179.2% higher efficiency than the EQ-5D-5L at distinguishing between respondents with different external health indicators, while the EQ-5D-5L was found to be 8.2% more efficient at detecting differences in self-reported health status than the SF-6Dv2. Conclusions Both the SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L have been demonstrated to be comparably valid and sensitive when used in Chinese population health surveys. The two measures may not be interchangeable given the moderate ICC and the systematic difference in utility values between the SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L. Further research is warranted to compare the test–retest reliability and responsiveness.

Interpretation and use of the 5-level EQ-5D response labels varied with survey language among Asians in Singapore

Validity and measurement equivalence of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire among heart failure patients in Malaysia: a cohort study

Cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of the Singapore English version of EQ-5D-Y: a qualitative study

Do Health Preferences Differ among Asian Populations? A Comparison of EQ-5D-5L Discrete Choice Experiments Data from 11 Asian Studies.

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States: A Comparison of Three Asian Countries

Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L Discrete Choice Experiments data from 11 Asian studies

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States: a Comparison of Seven Asian Populations.

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

The EQ-5D-5L is More Discriminative Than the EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Diabetes in Singapore.

Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D and SF-6D in East and South-East Asian populations: a scoping review

Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-3 L and the EQ-5D-5 L in an elderly Chinese population

Chinese Version of the EQ-5D Preference Weights: Applicability in a Chinese General Population

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Sub-Health: Evidence Based on Primary Health Care Workers in China

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

How the EQ-5D Utilities Are Derived Matters in Chinese Diabetes Patients: a Comparison Based on Different EQ-5D Scoring Functions for China.

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese Population Health Survey

Do Rural Residents in China Understand EQ-5D-5L As Intended? Evidence from a Qualitative Study.

Comparison of the measurement properties between a short and generic instrument, the 5-level EuroQoL Group’s 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, and a longer and disease-specific instrument, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast (FACT-B), in Asian breast cancer patients

Health-related quality of life in primary care patients: a comparison between EQ-5D-5L utility score and EQ-visual analogue scale

Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Measuring the HRQoL Burden of 4 Health Conditions in China

Valuation of EQ-5D-3L Health States in Singapore: Modeling of Time Trade-Off Values for 80 Empirically Observed Health States