The social construction of sustainable futures: how models and scenarios limit climate mitigation possibilities
Ben CliftCaroline KuzemkoDepartment of Politics and International Studies,University of Warwick,Coventry,UKBen Clift is Professor of Political Economy in the Department of Politics and International Studies at the University of Warwick where he has taught since 2003. He has published widely at the interface of comparative and international political economy. His books include The Office for Budget Responsibility and the Politics of Technocratic Economic Governance (Oxford University Press 2023),The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis (Oxford University Press 2018) and Comparative Political Economy: States,Markets and Global Capitalism (Palgrave 2014; 2nd Edition Bloomsbury 2021). His current research agenda focuses on the politics of technocratic governance amidst capitalism's ecological crisis. He has published widely in leading journals including The British Journal of Political Science,Journal of Common Market Studies,The Journal of European Public Policy,The Review of International Political Economy,New Political Economy,Party Politics,Comparative European Politics,Political Studies,Parliamentary Affairs,Government and Opposition,and British Journal of Politics and International Relations.Caroline Kuzemko is a Reader in IPE at the University of Warwick,UK. Her work explores the roles of politics,and policy,in enabling,constraining,and shaping sustainable energy transformations at international,national,and local governing scales. Her publications include a special section on 'New Directions in the IPE of Energy',in the Review of International Political Economy; and books on The Energy Security-Climate Nexus: Institutional Change in the UK and Beyond and The Global Energy Challenge: Environment,Development,and Security. She previously worked at UBS in Latin American equities.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2024.2342302
IF: 3.625
2024-04-26
New Political Economy
Abstract:This article shines a light on the act of social construction of climate change mitigation as a policy issue at the hands of expert bodies enjoying epistemic power, notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), using Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) as key tools. This is crucial to the politics of tackling climate change as IPCC models and scenarios profoundly shape what are seen as viable futures and mitigation policy options. Analysing how technocratic governance bodies broach climate change, its mitigation, and the associated economic costs and implications, reveals contestations within the technocratic politics of climate change. The particular social construction of mitigation as a policy issue through IAMs and IPCC scenarios has important and real socio-ecological consequences. This engagement with the technocratic politics of mitigation problematises five key assumptions that are fed into modelling, and reveals why and how they matter politically. We also highlight ways in which contestable assumptions built into IPCC IAMs undermine their credibility and usefulness for planning mitigation strategies.
economics,international relations,political science