Communicating climate futures: a multi-country study of how the media portray the IPCC scenarios in the 2021/2 Working Group reports

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03744-z

2024-05-17

Climatic Change

Abstract:The way governments and policy makers think about climate futures has a wide-ranging impact on how they formulate policy and plan for climate change impacts. In the lead-up to the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), the IPCC adopted a new scenarios framework that aimed to provide a fuller picture of the interacting elements and policy choices that affect climate change. However, these scenarios, known as Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), are complex and difficult to communicate. Most audiences, including policy makers, receive much of their information about climate change from mainstream media, and particularly online news sites. We therefore examined the five most popular online news sites in the UK and the USA, five popular English-language news sites in India, English-language news media from a wide range of African countries, and the Reuters News agency. Based on manual content analysis to assess 252 articles, we identify several important findings, amongst them: in all countries, the media provide little detailed explanation of how scenarios are developed, very little mention of SSPs, and virtually no detailed explanations of them; generally, journalists use the words 'projections', 'futures', and 'pathways' when talking about the IPCC scenarios, although some usage of 'predictions' or 'forecasts' is apparent; contrary to previous research, there were very few doomsday narratives such as 'only 12 years to act'. We conclude by drawing out some implications for more effective communication of the IPCC scenarios.

environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problems the Paper Attempts to Address

This paper primarily explores how the media reports on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenario predictions and analyzes the effectiveness and accuracy of these reports. Specifically:

1. **Media Coverage of IPCC Scenarios**:
- Does the media mention the various scenarios considered by the IPCC when reporting on IPCC reports?
- How does the media describe or portray different scenarios? What vocabulary do they use to discuss these scenarios?

2. **Media Coverage of Scenario Range**:
- Does the media report on the various scenarios and their possible futures, or do they use a binary framework (such as deadline narratives)?

3. **Credibility of Scenario Predictions**:
- Are scenario predictions questioned in the media? Are there skeptical voices using these scenarios to question the scientific validity of the IPCC?

4. **Uncertainty in Scenario Predictions**:
- Does the media mention the uncertainties in scenario predictions? Do they accurately describe these uncertainties?

Through the study of these questions, the paper aims to reveal the effectiveness and issues in the media's communication of IPCC scenario predictions and propose improvements to enhance the dissemination of these scenario predictions.