Abstract:Social media provides an essential platform for shaping and sharing opinions and consuming information in a decentralized way. However, users often interact with and are exposed to information mostly aligned with their beliefs, creating a positive feedback mechanism that reinforces those beliefs and excludes contrasting ones. In this paper, we study such mechanisms by analyzing the social network dynamics of controversial Twitter discussions using unsupervised methods that demand little computational power. Specifically, we focus on the retweet networks of the climate change conversation during 2019, when important climate social movements flourished. We find echo chambers of climate believers and climate skeptics that we identify based solely on the retweeting patterns of Twitter users. In particular, we study the information sources, or chambers, consumed by the audience of the leading users of the conversation. Users with similar (contrasting) ideological positions show significantly high (low)-overlapping chambers, resulting in a bimodal overlap distribution. Further, we uncover the ideological position of previously unobserved high-impact users based on how many audience members fall into either echo chamber. We uncover the ideology of more than half of the retweeting population as either climate believers or skeptics and find that the cross-group communication is small. Moreover, we find that, while the echo chamber structures are consistent throughout the year, most users inside the echo chambers change from one week to the next, suggesting that they are a stable emergent property of the Twittersphere. Interestingly, we detect a significant decrease in polarization and a significant increase on the number of climate skeptics that coincides with the main #FridaysForFuture strikes during September, 2019.

Polarizing Tweets on Climate Change

Quantifying the structure of controversial discussions with unsupervised methods: a look into the Twitter climate change conversation

Growing polarisation around climate change on social media

Climate Change Conspiracy Theories on Social Media

A cross-platform analysis of polarization and echo chambers in climate change discussions

Spread of Tweets in Climate Discussions

The social anatomy of climate change denial in the United States

Understanding Opinions Towards Climate Change on Social Media

Motivated reasoning and climate change: Comparing news sources, politicization, intensification, and qualification in denier versus believer subreddit comments

Polarization of Climate Politics Results from Partisan Sorting: Evidence from Finnish Twittersphere

Measuring Belief Dynamics on Twitter

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

Twitter’s Fake News Discourses Around Climate Change and Global Warming

The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption, Perceptions of Science and Scientists, and Support for Policy

Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land

United in criticism: The discursive politics and coalitions of Australian energy debates on social media

Social Bots’ Role in Climate Change Discussion on Twitter: Measuring Standpoints, Topics, and Interaction Strategies

The IPCC in the hybrid public sphere: divergent responses to climate mitigation solutions in mainstream and social media

Polarization dynamics: a study of individuals shifting between political communities on social media

How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum

The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014