Abstract:Social media provides an essential platform for shaping and sharing opinions and consuming information in a decentralized way. However, users often interact with and are exposed to information mostly aligned with their beliefs, creating a positive feedback mechanism that reinforces those beliefs and excludes contrasting ones. In this paper, we study such mechanisms by analyzing the social network dynamics of controversial Twitter discussions using unsupervised methods that demand little computational power. Specifically, we focus on the retweet networks of the climate change conversation during 2019, when important climate social movements flourished. We find echo chambers of climate believers and climate skeptics that we identify based solely on the retweeting patterns of Twitter users. In particular, we study the information sources, or chambers, consumed by the audience of the leading users of the conversation. Users with similar (contrasting) ideological positions show significantly high (low)-overlapping chambers, resulting in a bimodal overlap distribution. Further, we uncover the ideological position of previously unobserved high-impact users based on how many audience members fall into either echo chamber. We uncover the ideology of more than half of the retweeting population as either climate believers or skeptics and find that the cross-group communication is small. Moreover, we find that, while the echo chamber structures are consistent throughout the year, most users inside the echo chambers change from one week to the next, suggesting that they are a stable emergent property of the Twittersphere. Interestingly, we detect a significant decrease in polarization and a significant increase on the number of climate skeptics that coincides with the main #FridaysForFuture strikes during September, 2019.

Social Bots’ Role in Climate Change Discussion on Twitter: Measuring Standpoints, Topics, and Interaction Strategies

Social bots spoil activist sentiment without eroding engagement

Social bots sour activist sentiment without eroding engagement

Characterizing the role of bots’ in polarized stance on social media

Social Bots’ Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussion on Twitter

Social Bots' Sentiment Engagement In Health Emergencies: A Topic-Based Analysis Of The Covid-19 Pandemic Discussions On Twitter

Social Bots’ Involvement in the COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions on Twitter

Public interest in science or bots? Selective amplification of scientific articles on Twitter

Red Bots Do It Better: Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Partisan Behavior

The Botization of Science? Large-scale study of the presence and impact of Twitter bots in science dissemination

Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems

Not our kind of crowd! How partisan bias distorts perceptions of political bots on Twitter (now X)

Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic

How Humans versus Bots React to Deceptive and Trusted News Sources: A Case Study of Active Users

Social Bots: Human-Like by Means of Human Control?

Patterns of human and bots behaviour on Twitter conversations about sustainability

You are a Bot! -- Studying the Development of Bot Accusations on Twitter

Quantifying the structure of controversial discussions with unsupervised methods: a look into the Twitter climate change conversation

Could Social Bots' Sentiment Engagement Shape Humans' Sentiment on COVID-19 Vaccine Discussion on Twitter?

People are Strange when you're a Stranger: Impact and Influence of Bots on Social Networks

Effects of Social Bots in the Iran-Debate on Twitter