Abstract:Purpose: This in vitro study evaluated 6 post systems over 4 simulated clinical stages of tooth restoration to (1) determine quantitatively the fracture resistance strength at each stage when a static loading force is applied to cause failure; (2) determine the failure mode for each post system at each simulated clinical stage; and (3) determine the feasibility of removing failed post systems. Materials and methods: Ten post systems made with various materials and designs were tested at the following 4 stages of simulated clinical treatment: stage #1: posts only, loaded using a 3-point loading model to failure, to determine transverse strengths and failure modes for each post system; stage #2: posts alone, bonded into teeth; stage #3: posts bonded into teeth with core build up; stage #4: post and core build up and full veneer restoration. For stages #2 through #4, the coronal portion of 60 mandibular premolars was amputated at the cemento-enamel junction, the canals were treated endodontically, and the specimens were mounted in acrylic blocks. A testing force was applied to the posts at 90 degrees to the long axis of the tooth, 4 mm from the cemento-enamel junction. The O'Brien test for constant variance was performed over the treatment groups. For nonconstant variance, the Welsh analysis of variance was used to test for equalities of treatment means. The Tukey Kramer procedure determined which treatment procedures differed. Results: The failure thresholds for each post system were significantly different at each stage of testing, but the order of test results by post type remained generally consistent from one stage to the next. ParaPosts (Coltene, Whaledent Int, New York, NY) and core build up resulted in significantly higher failure thresholds through all 4 stages of testing. This post system also consistently displayed a high number of nonfavorable tooth fractures. FibreKor post and cores (Jeneric Pentron Inc, Wallingford, CT) resulted in significantly lower failure threshold values in stages #2 through #4. This post system displayed no tooth fractures in stages #2 and #3 and a similar number of nonfavorable tooth fractures in stage #4 when compared with the other systems. C-Post (Bisco Dental Products, Schaumburg, IL), CosmoPost (Ivoclar Vivadent North America Inc, Amherst, NY), and AesthetiPost (Bisco Dental Products) grouped in descending order through stages #2 to #4. These systems displayed intermediate fracture resistance strengths, as well as a moderate number of nonfavorable tooth fractures. CosmoPost exhibited a significant number of brittle post fractures with fragments left in the root canal at all stages. The fracture resistance of the cast metal post varied from stage to stage. No teeth fractured at stage #2. At stage #3, 9 of 10 teeth fractured nonfavorably, and all teeth fractured nonfavorably in stage #4. Conclusions: The fiber posts evaluated provided an advantage over a conventional post that showed a higher number of irretrievable post and unrestorable root fractures. At the stage of final restoration insertion, there was no difference in force to failure for all but the FibreKor material, which continued to be weaker than all other tested materials. The fiber posts were readily retrievable after failure, whereas the remaining post systems tested were nonretrievable. J Prosthodont 2001;10:26-36.

Removal of fiber posts using conventional versus guided endodontics: a comparative study of dentin loss and complications

Effectiveness of different fiber post removal techniques and their influence on dentinal microcrack formation

Guided endodontics versus conventional access cavity preparation: an ex vivo comparative study of substance loss

Comparison of the Pull-Out Resistance of Grossly Decayed Primary Anterior Teeth Restored With Two Different Intracanal Posts: An In Vitro Study

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Carbon Fiber Posts and Glass Fiber Posts in Permanent Anterior Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy comparison of single- and double-sleeve endodontic guides for fiber post removal

A laboratory study comparing the static navigation technique using a bur with a conventional freehand technique using ultrasonic tips for the removal of fibre posts

Effect of Posts Surface Treatments on the Pull-out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Post to Root Dentin “A Comparative In-Vitro Study”

Fibre post removal using ultrasonic tips: A comparative in vitro study using different protocols

Application of 3D-printed resin guides for the removal of molar fiber posts

Fatigue survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with different fiber-reinforced composite resin post strategies versus universal 2-piece fiber post system: An in vitro study

Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Survival of severely compromised endodontically treated teeth restored with or without a fiber glass post

Evaluation of Bond Strength and Fracture Load of Teeth With Flared Root Canals Restored With Prefabricated, Anatomical, and Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Fiber Posts

In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration

Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites

Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Multifiber Posts Compared with Single Fiber Posts

Comparative Study of Bond Strength of Four Resin Cements Used for Endodontic Glass-Fibre Posts

Removal of fiber post under the guidance of digital guide plate and one-piece glass fiber posts-and-cores repair: a clinical report

Effect of Photodynamic Therapy with Four Light-Sensitive Materials on the Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Root Dentin