Abstract:Past studies have shown that catheter diameter is one of the device-dependent problems which influence the manometric results in the conventional water perfusion esophageal manometry. High-resolution solid-state manometry which abandons water perfusion is thought as an improved manometry method benefited from more pressure sensors, and it is gradually widely used in many present esophageal motility studies. There was no research to evaluate the influence of catheter diameter on the solid-state high-resolution manometry results. The aim of this study was to investigate whether solid-state high-resolution catheters of different diameter provide different data and results. Nine asymptomatic volunteers and 18 gastroesophageal reflux disease patients accepted high-resolution manometry examinations with two solid-state catheters of different outer diameter (4.2 mm and 2.7 mm). Every examination contained 5 minutes resting pressure, 10 water swallows and 10 bread swallows. Some important parameters of the esophageal sphincters and esophageal body peristalsis were analyzed. They included the locations and resting pressure of sphincters, the distal contractile integral, the 4-second integrated relaxation pressure etc. Then, these parameters and the diagnosis of each swallow based on them provided by the two different diameter catheters were compared. (i) The 4.2 mm thick catheter provided higher upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure than the 2.7 mm thick catheter (59.4 ± 21.1 mmHg vs. 49.7 ± 21.4 mmHg); (ii) the 2.7 mm thick catheter provided higher 4-second integrated relaxation pressure than the 4.2 mm thick catheter (10.9 ± 4.5 mmHg vs. 8.5 ± 3.8 mmHg) in water swallows; (iii) the mean distal contractile integral of the water and bread swallows in the large diameter catheter were higher than in the small diameter catheter (989.2 ± 650.0 mmHg/cm/s vs. 806.3 ± 563.7 mmHg/cm/s in water swallows, 1762.5 ± 1440.6 mmHg/cm/s vs. 1275.7 ± 982.0 mmHg/cm/s in bread swallows); (iv) on the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, most parameters in bread swallows provided by the two catheters were of no statistical significance; (v) the 2.7 mm thick catheter detected more hypotensive peristalsis swallows than the other catheter in water swallows; and (vi) the final diagnosis of about half of the subjects provided by the two catheters were different. The 2.7 mm thick solid-state high-resolution manometry catheter provides somewhat different data from the usually used 4.2 mm thick catheter. It is needed to set up different and independent series of normative value for the solid-state high-resolution manometry catheters of different outer diameter. The normative value and diagnostic criterion got from one catheter is not universal and acceptable for researches with catheter of different diameter.

High-resolution Impedance Manometry Criteria in the Sitting Position Indicative of Incomplete Bolus Clearance

The Differences in the Esophageal Motility Between Liquid and Solid Bolus Swallows: A Multicenter High-Resolution Manometry Study in Chinese Asymptomatic Volunteers

The motility of esophageal sphincters during liquid and solid bolus swallows: a multicenter normative value study of high-resolution manometry in China.

Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies

Four‐dimensional impedance manometry volume metrics for predicting abnormal bolus retention

Four-Dimensional Impedance Manometry In Esophageal Motility Disorders

531 Systematic Endoscopic Surveillance in a High-Risk Cohort is Feasible for the Detection of Early Gastric Neoplasia

Dysphagia associated with esophageal wall thickening in patients with nonspecific high‐resolution manometry findings: Understanding motility beyond the Chicago classification version 4.0

Application of a novel straight leg raise test during high‐resolution manometry can predict esophageal contractile reserve in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

High‐resolution versus conventional manometry for the diagnosis of small bowel motor dysfunction

Comparative Prevalence of Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Impact of Chicago v4.0 vs. v3.0 Criteria

Risk Factors Associated with Unsuccessful High-Resolution Manometry

A Comparison of Functional Luminal Imaging Probe With High-resolution Manometry, Timed Barium Esophagram, and pH Impedance Testing to Evaluate Functional Luminal Imaging Probe’s Diagnostic Capabilities

Influence of the Catheter Diameter on the Investigation of the Esophageal Motility Through Solid-State High-Resolution Manometry.

Identification Of Achalasia Within Absent Contractility Phenotypes On High-Resolution Manometry: Prevalence, Predictive Factors And Treatment Outcome

A Comparison between Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0 and Their Impact on Manometric Diagnoses in Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Cases

Discriminating "impaired" from "disordered" contractile response on FLIP panometry by utilizing pressure measurement

Esophageal Chemical Clearance and Mucosa Integrity Values in Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients with Different Esophageal Dynamics

S587 Esophageal Distensibility Changes as Measured by EndoFLIP in Different Esophageal Motility Disorders

Investigating Parkinson's disease with dual high resolution pharyngeal manometry with impedance and videofluoroscopy

Integrated Relaxation Pressure and Its Diagnostic Ability May Vary According to the Conditions Used for HREM Recording