Abstract:Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) provide more venous access for tasks for delivery of medicine, laboratory testing and hemodynamic monitoring which occupy a fundamental role in the treatment of seriously ill patients, specially in the diagnosed tumor patients. However, despite their many benefits, PICCs are not innocuous and associated with important complications. We must pay attention to the upper extremity deep venous thromboembolism. Although the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) are widespread in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU in most hospitals, PICCs have become more popular in non-ICU department. 1 There are many advantages in this technique compared with CVCs. First of all, these devices are safer than CVCs which could eliminate the discomfort associated with phlebotomy, they also provide extended and reliable venous access. Then, they reduce the rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) significantly. Furthermore nurses can get special training to acquire the technique which can place PICCs at the patients bedside. These factors will lead to reduced hospitalization cost to the patients enabling them to get intravenous therapy at home. All over the world, the patients have welcomed and supported the widespread use of these venous catheters. Increased use of PICCs in China and triggered the debate regarding PICCs' security and effectiveness. There are some literatures about PICC and UEDVT reported in many countries apart from China. But there are few article in China. Xing L et al 2 reported that there were 187 breast cancer patients using a PICC for chemotherapy from August 2009 to July 2011. Four of them were removed as a result of a PICC-related UEDVT. 2 In the past one year, in our hospital, medical records of 126 consecutive patients who underwent upper extremity venous duplex ultrasound (VDU) had acute UEDVT. About 74% patients had arm swelling or arm pain; 93% had cancer; 96% had inserted PICC. Cancer patients with PICC had more occurred UEDVT. At the same time, 13% patients also had lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of pulmonary embolism screened by the computed tomography angiography (CTA) was 7% with 9 patients and one month mortality rate was 5.5%. The majority of patients (90%) with UEDVT received anticoagulation therapy and 10% had no anticoagulation because of anticoagulation taboo. The most common risk factors for UEDVT were PICC and a diagnosis of cancer. The rate of PE and mortality rate from UEDVT made no difference at 7% …

Percutaneous retrieval of PICC fractures via the femoral vein in six cancer patients

IP269 Percutaneous Retrieval of Totally Implantable Venous Port Catheter Fragment in Atrium or Vena Cava: A 16-Patient Experience

Diagnosis prevention and treatment for PICC-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in breast cancer patients.

The Feasibility and Safety of PICCs Accessed Via the Superficial Femoral Vein in Patients with Superior Vena Cava Syndrome

Percutaneous Retrieval of a PICC Fragment Adherent to Vascular Wall 6 Years after Fracture

[Complications with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters - Observations and Nursing Experiences at One Medical Center in Chengdu].

Feasibility analysis of inserting PICC line in operative side upper limb of postoperative breast cancer patients

Embolization of a Fractured Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter to Pulmonary Arteries: A Sporadic Life-Threatening Phenomenon

A case report on the choice of venous access after ectopic peripherally inserted central catheter in an upper limb of a patient with a second recurrence of right-side breast cancer

Migrated Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in the Right Ventricle and Bilateral Pulmonary Arteries: A Case Report

Lower extremity peripherally inserted central catheter placement ectopic to the ascending lumbar vein: A case report

Rescue of a patient with a 50 cm broken PICC tube retracted and wrapped in pulmonary artery: a case report

The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Patterns of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients Followed Up by Ultrasound

Comparison on clinical efficacy and adverse reactions between TPICC and ultrasound-guided PICC for advanced tumors: A retrospective study

Catheterization of PICC through a superficial femoral vein for patients with superior vena cava syndrome using ECG positioning and ultrasound-guided technologies

The Problem with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in China

Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Related Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Incidence and risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter-related vein thrombosis in lung cancer patients

Risk factors associated with PICC-related upper extremity venous thrombosis in cancer patients.

Case Report: A report on the countermeasures after PICC line breakage in 3 postoperative breast cancer patients

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of PICC-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: a retrospective study