Abstract:From an early age, children are taught norms about socially-acceptable behaviors; however, children's ability to recognize these norms often predates their tendency to follow them. This conflict between understanding and action has been predominantly studied in cases when enacting the norm would be costly for the child (i.e. when sharing would result in forgoing resources), but is underexplored in more low-cost scenarios. The current study examined the gap between children's knowledge and behavior in a context with a low personal cost: telling a prosocial, or white, lie. Children (N = 46) evaluated objectively poor drawings in three contexts: in one context, children were asked how a third-party character should act in a story (to assess knowledge) and in the other two contexts, children were asked to provide real-time feedback to another person and to a puppet (to assess behavior). Results indicated that children endorsed prosocial lying norms (i.e. said the story character should give the drawing a good rating) at a significantly higher rate than they demonstrated through their own lie-telling behaviors (i.e. their willingness to give social partners good ratings). These data indicate that the discrepancy between children's knowledge of social norms and their actual behaviors cannot simply be attributed to the personal costs of enacting social norms. Instead, this competence-performance gap may be due to the fact that children are often taught social rules via hypothetical situations but enacting behaviors in real-world situations may require additional skills, such as inhibition and the processing of complex, multimodal social cues.

Is it okay to tell? Children's judgements about information disclosure

Children's moral evaluations of reporting the transgressions of peers: Age differences in evaluations of tattling.

On a need‐to‐know basis: Young children distinguish conventional and privileged information

Young Children Selectively Hide the Truth About Sensitive Topics

Developmental Characteristics of the Pupils' Emotion Display Rules and Its Relationship to the Peer Acceptance

5- 9 Year-old Children's Understanding Trait of Guilt Emotion

Upsetting others and provoking ridicule: children's reasoning about the self-presentational consequences of rule violation.

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms

Children’s selective information sharing based on the recipient’s role

Children's Reasoning about Lie-telling and Truth-telling in Politeness Contexts

Young Children's Moral Judgments, Justifications, and Emotion Attributions in Peer Relationship Contexts

Children Infer Intentions by Assessing Epistemic Attitudes in Interpersonal Interactions

Age‐related changes in information‐seeking behavior about morally relevant events

To Tell or Not to Tell? Factors Influencing Young People’s Informal Disclosures of Child Sexual Abuse

Effect of lie labelling on children's evaluation of selfish, polite, and altruistic lies

Who Is the Tattletale? Linking Individual Differences in Socioemotional Competence and Anxiety to Tattling Behavior and Attitudes in Young Children

Someone who knows and someone I trust: Investigating how and with whom U.S. 8- to 14-year-old youth seek to learn about racial inequality.

Seeing Gray in a World of Black and White: Children Appreciate Reasoners Who Approach Moral Dilemmas With Humility

Consistency and Change in Children’s Tattling on their Siblings: Children’s Perspectives on the Moral Rules and Procedures of Family Life

"Why did she do that?": Chinese children's preference for trait‐based explanations of behavior

Strategies and Reasons for Nondisclosure in Close Relationships During Adolescence