Abstract:From an early age, children are taught norms about socially-acceptable behaviors; however, children's ability to recognize these norms often predates their tendency to follow them. This conflict between understanding and action has been predominantly studied in cases when enacting the norm would be costly for the child (i.e. when sharing would result in forgoing resources), but is underexplored in more low-cost scenarios. The current study examined the gap between children's knowledge and behavior in a context with a low personal cost: telling a prosocial, or white, lie. Children (N = 46) evaluated objectively poor drawings in three contexts: in one context, children were asked how a third-party character should act in a story (to assess knowledge) and in the other two contexts, children were asked to provide real-time feedback to another person and to a puppet (to assess behavior). Results indicated that children endorsed prosocial lying norms (i.e. said the story character should give the drawing a good rating) at a significantly higher rate than they demonstrated through their own lie-telling behaviors (i.e. their willingness to give social partners good ratings). These data indicate that the discrepancy between children's knowledge of social norms and their actual behaviors cannot simply be attributed to the personal costs of enacting social norms. Instead, this competence-performance gap may be due to the fact that children are often taught social rules via hypothetical situations but enacting behaviors in real-world situations may require additional skills, such as inhibition and the processing of complex, multimodal social cues.

Children's Reasoning about Lie-telling and Truth-telling in Politeness Contexts

Theory of mind and preschoolers' understanding of misdeed and politeness lies

Young Children Selectively Hide the Truth About Sensitive Topics

Emotion matters in early polite lies: Preschoolers' polite lie-telling in relation to cognitive and emotion-related abilities

Effect of lie labelling on children's evaluation of selfish, polite, and altruistic lies

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms

Prosocial lie-telling in preschoolers: The impacts of ethnic background, parental factors, and perceived consequence for the partner

Seeing Gray in a World of Black and White: Children Appreciate Reasoners Who Approach Moral Dilemmas With Humility

Lies and truth: a study of the development of the concept

To Lie or Not to Lie? The Influence of Parenting and Theory-of-Mind Understanding on Three-Year-Old Children's Honesty.

Differences in politeness perception of irony and prosocial lies: Exploring the role of age, gender, and geographic location.

Relations among lie-telling self-efficacy, moral disengagement, and willingness to tell antisocial lies among children and adolescents

Is it okay to tell? Children's judgements about information disclosure

Do They Really Mean It? Children's Inference of Speaker Intentions and the Role of Age and Gender

Upsetting others and provoking ridicule: children's reasoning about the self-presentational consequences of rule violation.

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

Other-Benefiting Lying Behavior in Preschool Children and Its Relation to Theory of Mind and Empathy

Children's moral evaluations of reporting the transgressions of peers: Age differences in evaluations of tattling.

Truthful but Misleading: Advanced Linguistic Strategies for Lying Among Children

Reasoning in Social Settings

The role of theory of mind, executive function and language on children's lying behaviour