Abstract:Introduction Previous research by the authors (Shi & Su, 2006) suggests that children’s deceptive behavior not only is related to their executive function as indicated in the studies of Carlson (1989) and Hala (2001), it may also be related to the magnitude of the situational intimidation felt by the children when they are deceiving or going to deceive others. Extending this argument, in this study we examined children's deceptive behavior as functions of felt intimidation. Method and Results In Study 1, different interactive partners were involved in an overt deceptive situation where children had to deceive directly in the face of their partner. When facing different partners, children would have different degree of intimidation and thus different patterns of deceptive behavior would be seen. In particular, this experiment focused on 6-year-olds' deceptive/honest behavior when facing a male adult, a female adult, a same-age boy or a same-age girl as their competitive target in overt situations. The results showed that children's gender, target's gender and age had an interaction effect on children's deceptive/honest behavior. Children tended to cheat the amiable female adult but were honest to the stricter male. To some extent, this result supports our hypothesis and underlies the interaction effect between gender and age of the deceivers and the people being deceived. Boys tend to cheat other same-age boys just as girls tend to cheat other same-age girls. Combining the results of our previous research and Study 1 of this research, we found that children's deceptive behavior was in fact so complicated that it was correlated with various factors including situational intimidation and children's theory of mind. Similarly, other studies (Shapiro, 2005; Ostrov, 2006) have shown that such variables as children's relational aggression and temperament are also associated with children's deceptive behavior. In order to systematically understand the possible antecedents leading to children's deceptive behavior (which might predict children's future internalizing and externalizing problematic behavior), in Study 2 we explored whether children's other social characteristics were involved in children's deceptive behavior in various situations. We adopted the social development scale for 4- to 7-year-olds to measure multiple dimensions of children's social developmental characteristics. The results showed that children's deception in covert situation was significantly correlated with children's will. On the other hand, children's behavioral overt deception was significantly correlated with emulative anxiety, while lying behavior was significantly correlated with their self-concept. Conclusion These results demonstrate that, if the deceptive action is relatively difficult to perform so that children have to perform it covertly, children's will power may affect their deceptive behavior. But if the deceptive action is easy to carry out overtly, then children's degree of emulative anxiety is very strongly associated with this deceptive behavior. As for lying, children who have a higher self-concept are more likely to lie. These and other results remind us of the fact that deception is related to various social characteristics of the children in different deceptive situations. When we study children's deceptive behavior in general and want to determine whether we need to intervene children's deceptive behavior, we need to take all these factors into consideration.

To Lie or Not to Lie? The Influence of Parenting and Theory-of-Mind Understanding on Three-Year-Old Children's Honesty.

Other-Benefiting Lying Behavior in Preschool Children and Its Relation to Theory of Mind and Empathy

Notice of Retraction Look into the Mind or Look at the Eyes: A Comparison of Chinese and Westerners' Beliefs of Lies

Effect of lie labelling on children's evaluation of selfish, polite, and altruistic lies

Theory of mind and preschoolers' understanding of misdeed and politeness lies

The role of theory of mind, executive function and language on children's lying behaviour

Look into the mind or look at the eyes: A comparison of Chinese and westerner's beliefs of lies

To tell the truth or not: What effortful control, false belief, and sympathy tell us about preschoolers’ instrumental lies

Young Children Selectively Hide the Truth About Sensitive Topics

Emotion matters in early polite lies: Preschoolers' polite lie-telling in relation to cognitive and emotion-related abilities

Progress and Directions of the Research on Children's Lying

Truthful but Misleading: Advanced Linguistic Strategies for Lying Among Children

Parent‐reported problematic lying tendencies and BIS/BAS activity as predictors of children's antisocial lie‐telling

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms

Relations among lie-telling self-efficacy, moral disengagement, and willingness to tell antisocial lies among children and adolescents

From the external to the internal

Prosocial lie-telling in preschoolers: The impacts of ethnic background, parental factors, and perceived consequence for the partner

Is childhood lying shaped by callous-unemotional traits or does lie-telling make children more callous-unemotional? A longitudinal between- and within-person perspective

Children's Reasoning about Lie-telling and Truth-telling in Politeness Contexts

From The External To The Internal: Behavior Clarifications Facilitate Theory Of Mind (Tom) Development In Chinese Children

Children’s Deceptive Behaviors And Related Social Characters