Effects of toasting procedures on the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in toasted bread.

L. Rey-Salgueiro,M. S. García-Falcón,E. Martínez-Carballo,J. Simal-Gándara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.026

IF: 8.8

2008-05-15

Food Chemistry

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Prolonged postoperative apnea complicating gynecologic surgery; atypical cholinesterase and myasthenia gravis.

J. Maharry,R. Sack

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90680-9

IF: 9.8

1982-05-01

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:
The effect of confirmation bias and racial stereotypes on perceptions of guilt and interrogation strategy decisions

Laure Brimbal,Dominick J. Atkinson,Christian A. Meissner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4159

2024-01-17

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract:We examined whether racial stereotypes and guilt bias could affect perceptions of suspects and decisions in investigations. In three studies, participants read about a case, provided guilt judgments, and suggested questions they would ask a suspect. In all studies we manipulated race‐based stereotypes and guilt bias using different methods and operationalizations to provide a robust test of our hypotheses. In Experiment 1, we found that participants asked more guilt‐presumptive questions to the subject they decided was guilty. In Experiment 2, we found that when presented with more incriminating evidence, participants perceived suspects as more guilty and chose/generated more guilt‐presumptive questions. In Experiment 3, we found that those with less incriminating evidence reported lower levels of guilt and chose more coercive techniques. Our findings highlight the complexity of racial stereotypes and confirmation bias within investigation decision‐making.

psychology, experimental
Blinding prosecutors to defendants’ race: A policy proposal to reduce unconscious bias in the criminal justice system

Sunita Sah,Christopher T. Robertson,Shima B. Baughman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151500100208

2015-10-01

Behavioral Science & Policy

Abstract:Racial minorities are disproportionately imprisoned in the United States. This disparity is unlikely to be due solely to differences in criminal behavior. Behavioral science research has documented that prosecutors harbor unconscious racial biases. These unconscious biases play a role whenever prosecutors exercise their broad discretion, such as in choosing what crimes to charge and when negotiating plea bargains. To reduce this risk of unconscious racial bias, we propose a policy change: Prosecutors should be blinded to the race of criminal defendants wherever feasible. This could be accomplished by removing information identifying or suggesting the defendant's race from police dossiers shared with prosecutors and by avoiding mentions of race in conversations between prosecutors and defense attorneys. Race is almost always irrelevant to the merits of a criminal prosecution; it should be omitted from the proceedings whenever possible for the sake of justice.
Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

Robert F. Lockamyeir Curt A. Carlson a Psychology,SUNY Oneonta,Oneonta,NY,USAb Psychology and Special Education,Texas A&M University–Commerce,Commerce,TX,USA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2024.2393429

2024-08-24

Psychology Crime and Law

Abstract:It is common for a perpetrator's appearance to change between committing the crime and later appearing in an identification procedure. The present study investigated how such appearance change (AC) would be evaluated by potential jurors, as well as tested mock jurors' evaluations of the appearance change instruction (ACI) utilized by police. Recent research indicates that the ACI harms eyewitness identification accuracy and limits the predictive nature of confidence, but would mock jurors' estimates of suspect guilt reflect this? In Experiment 1, AC reduced suspect guilt estimates, but the ACI eliminated this effect, indicating that potential jurors may not discount an identification if made after ACI. Experiment 2 introduced a hypothetical eyewitness expert who informs participants about the research that both AC and the ACI harm eyewitness performance. We also compared two types of expert instructions based on recent mock jury research: simple versus reason-based. Both types served to reduce suspect guilt estimates associated with AC. Participants still trusted the ACI even with expert instructions, but not as much as when there was no expert. Lastly, we also manipulated eyewitness confidence level, supporting recent research that manipulations have no effect on suspect guilt estimates when confidence is low (i.e. uncertainty trumps ).

psychology, multidisciplinary,law,criminology & penology
Perceptions of Anti-Black Bias in the Criminal Justice System Contribute to Pro-Black (Versus White) Bias in Criminal Justice Research

Tara L. Lesick,David S. March

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2024.2415919

2024-10-18

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Abstract:Black Americans experience more frequent guilty verdicts and harsher sentences in the criminal justice system. However, recent laboratory work often finds either trivial differences or a pro-Black bias where people provide more lenient verdicts for Black versus White defendants. Across five studies, we find a consistent pro-Black bias even after reducing social desirability concerns. Instead, the pro-Black bias results from a negative relationship between perceived anti-Black criminal justice bias and the Black suspect's verdict. The current work shows the pro-Black bias as a consequence of the newly salient perception of racial bias in the criminal justice system. Consequently, as people's perceptions of racial disparities in the criminal justice system increase, this in-lab effect may manifest in real-world criminal justice outcomes.

psychology, social
Race, Culpability, and Defendant Plea-Bargaining Decisions: An Experimental Simulation

Emalee J. W. Quickel,David M. Zimmerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2018.1517294

2019-01-22

Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice

Abstract:Guilty pleas account for the vast majority of criminal convictions, yet experimental research on this topic is surprisingly uncommon; furthermore, race is seldom examined in the existing body of experimental studies. The current study utilized a 2 (Participant Race: White, non-White) X 2 (Defendant Culpability: Guilty, Innocent) between-subjects factorial design to investigate mock-defendant plea decisions using a vignette paradigm; culpability was randomly assigned. A significant main effect for culpability was found, such that guilty participants were more likely to accept the plea; however, 32.6% of innocent participants indicated that they would plead guilty to the crime in order to receive a guaranteed lesser sentence. The impact of culpability on plea decision making was partially mediated by individual beliefs about the case (e.g., strength of the case against them, likelihood of conviction at trial), which is especially interesting because this information was held constant across all conditions. There was no main effect for participant race in plea decisions (and no significant race by culpability interaction), although some racial differences in attitudes toward the criminal justice system were found. Possible explanations for these findings and implications for future research are explored.

psychology, multidisciplinary,criminology & penology
Rating the Honesty of White and Black Children via Implicit and Explicit Measures: Implications for Child Victims in the Criminal Justice System

William Hall,Alison M. O’Connor,Karen L. Campbell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595231173363

2023-04-30

Child Maltreatment

Abstract:Child Maltreatment, Ahead of Print. The present study explored implicit and explicit honesty perceptions of White and Black children and whether these perceptions predicted legal decisions in a child abuse case. Participants consisted of 186 younger and 189 older adults from the online Prolific participant pool. Implicit racial bias was measured via a modified Implicit Association Test and explicit perceptions through self-reports. Participants read a simulated legal case where either a Black or White child alleged physical abuse against their sports coach, and they rated the honesty of the child's testimony and rendered a verdict. Participants were implicitly biased to associate honesty with White children over Black children, and this bias was stronger among older adults. In the legal vignette, for participants who read about a Black child victim, greater implicit racial bias predicted less trust in the child's testimony and a lower likelihood of convicting the coach of abusing the child. In contrast to their implicit bias, participants self-reported Black children as being more honest than White children, suggesting a divergence in racial attitudes across implicit and explicit measures. Implications for child abuse victims are discussed.

social work,family studies
The role of perceived defendant criminality on attributions and case outcomes

Mariah Sorby,Andre Kehn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04095-7

IF: 2.8

2022-12-08

Current Psychology

Abstract:The race-crime congruence effect occurs when defendants accused of racially stereotypic crimes receive more punitive outcomes than those accused of non-stereotypic crimes. Additionally, data shows that specific facial cues elicit criminal stereotypes. However, limited data on how appearance-based inferences of criminality impact case judgments exists. Through two studies, we aimed 1) to expand the race-crime congruence effect literature by investigating differences in judgments towards Black, White, and Hispanic defendants, 2) to further explore the predictors of perceived defendant criminality, and 3) to examine the impact of perceived criminality on case judgments. Six hundred eighty-seven participants were randomly assigned to one of nine brief case summaries in a 3 (race) × 3 (stereotypic crime) factorial design and completed various measures. Contrary to predictions, no significant race-crime congruence effects were found along with mixed results regarding the predictors of perceived criminality. However, in study one, perceived criminality mediated the relationship between defendant race x participant prejudice and stability attributions. In study two, stability attributions mediated the relationship between perceived criminality and recommended punishments. These studies provide two substantial contributions to the literature. The results provide evidence of appearance-based inferences of criminality impacting perceptions of defendant behavior and judgments. Additionally, causal beliefs of defendant behavior may in part explain why one's appearance impacts other's judgments of them.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects

Jennifer M. Jones,Jacqueline Katzman,Margaret Bull Kovera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1233782

IF: 3.8

2024-04-13

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Introduction: Despite converging evidence that people more closely associate the construct of criminality with Black people who exhibit a more African facial phenotype than Black people who express a more European phenotype, eyewitness researchers have largely ignored phenotypic bias as a potential contributor to the racial disparities in the criminal legal system. If this form of phenotypic bias extends to eyewitness identification tasks, eyewitnesses may be more likely to identify Black suspects with an African rather than European phenotype, regardless of their guilt status. Further, in cases where the witness's description of the perpetrator does not contain phenotypic information, phenotypic mismatch between the suspect and the other lineup members may bias identification decisions toward or against the suspect. If witnesses can use elements of the lineup construction to guide their identification decisions rather than relying on their recognition memory, then the lineup should be deemed unfair due to suspect bias. The current study also investigated lineup presentation method as a procedural safeguard, predicting that that when lineups were presented simultaneously, there would be a significant two-way interaction of phenotypic bias and lineup composition, with a larger simple main effect of phenotypic bias when lineups were suspect-biased (i.e., the fillers were a phenotypic mismatch to the suspect) than when all lineup members shared the same phenotype. We expected that this interaction would be significantly smaller or non-significant for sequential lineups. Methods: Participants watched a mock crime video that contained a Black culprit with either a more African phenotype or a less African phenotype before attempting identifications from a photo array that contained a suspect whose phenotype always matched the culprit viewed in the video, but varied in culprit-presence, phenotypic match of the suspect and fillers, and presentation method. Results: Participants did not identify Black suspects with Afrocentric features more often than Black suspects with Eurocentric features. However, witnesses made more identifications of suspects when the fillers did not match the suspect's phenotype compared to when all lineup members possessed similar phenotypic features. Discussion: In sum, phenotypic bias did not influence our participant-witnesses' identification decisions, nor interact with lineup composition and lineup presentation type to affect identifications of suspects, suggesting that phenotypic bias may be less influential in match-to-memory tasks than other types of legal decision-making (e.g., determining guilt and sentencing). However, the suggestiveness created by failing to match fillers' phenotypes to the suspect's phenotype can be avoided with proper attention to fair lineup construction.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts

Tamara Shengelia,David Lagnado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.519262

IF: 3.8

2021-02-05

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:In criminal trials, evidence often involves a degree of uncertainty and decision-making includes moving from the initial presumption of innocence to inference about guilt based on that evidence. The jurors’ ability to combine evidence and make accurate intuitive probabilistic judgments underpins this process. Previous research has shown that errors in probabilistic reasoning can be explained by a misalignment of the evidence presented with the intuitive causal models that people construct. This has been explored in abstract and context-free situations. However, less is known about how people interpret evidence in context-rich situations such as legal cases. The present study examined participants’ intuitive probabilistic reasoning in legal contexts and assessed how people’s causal models underlie the process of belief updating in the light of new evidence. The study assessed whether participants update beliefs in line with Bayesian norms and if errors in belief updating can be explained by the causal structures underpinning the evidence integration process. The study was based on a recent case in England where a couple was accused of intentionally harming their baby but was eventually exonerated because the child’s symptoms were found to be caused by a rare blood disorder. Participants were presented with a range of evidence, one piece at a time, including physical evidence and reports from experts. Participants made probability judgments about the abuse and disorder as causes of the child’s symptoms. Subjective probability judgments were compared against Bayesian norms. The causal models constructed by participants were also elicited. Results showed that overall participants revised their beliefs appropriately in the right direction based on evidence. However, this revision was done without exact Bayesian computation and errors were observed in estimating the weight of evidence. Errors in probabilistic judgments were partly accounted for, by differences in the causal models representing the evidence. Our findings suggest that understanding causal models that guide people’s judgments may help shed light on errors made in evidence integration and potentially identify ways to address accuracy in judgment.

psychology, multidisciplinary
The biasing nature of gang evidence: inducing memory errors for evidence of past criminal behavior

M. L. Eisen,A. Olaguez,R. C. Ying,Gabriela Cedré,M. K. Cunius,A. Dianat,J. M. Jones

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2024.2356790

2024-05-30

Psychology Crime and Law

Abstract:Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of introducing gang evidence on jurors' memory of the evidence and decision-making. In Experiment 1, 234 participants viewed a staged trial. The evidence against the defendant was weak and consisted of a single tentative eyewitness identification. Half of the participants viewed a version of the trial in which the defendant was described as a dangerous gang member, and half viewed the trial with no mention of gangs. Those who heard the gang testimony were significantly more likely to falsely recall hearing evidence that was never presented describing the defendant's previous criminal conduct and convictions for similar crimes. The second experiment ( N = 328) was conducted online to secure a more diverse national sample. The results replicated, as those in the gang condition were significantly more likely to falsely remember hearing testimony about the defendant's criminal history and to find the defendant guilty.

psychology, multidisciplinary,law,criminology & penology
Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges

Myrto Pantazi,Olivier Klein,Mikhail Kissine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500007361

2020-03-01

Judgment and decision making

Abstract:Abstract Previous studies have shown that people are truth-biased in that they tend to believe the information they receive, even if it is clearly flagged as false. The truth bias has been recently proposed to be an instance of meta-cognitive myopia, that is, of a generalized human insensitivity towards the quality and correctness of the information available in the environment. In two studies we tested whether meta-cognitive myopia and the ensuing truth bias may operate in a courtroom setting. Based on a well-established paradigm in the truth-bias literature, we asked mock jurors (Study 1) and professional judges (Study 2) to read two crime reports containing aggravating or mitigating information that was explicitly flagged as false. Our findings suggest that jurors and judges are truth-biased, as their decisions and memory about the cases were affected by the false information. We discuss the implications of the potential operation of the truth bias in the courtroom, in the light of the literature on inadmissible and discredible evidence, and make some policy suggestions.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Social priming of speech perception: The role of individual differences in implicit racial and ethnic associations.

Drew J. McLaughlin,Kristin J. Van Engen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001187

2024-02-08

Abstract:Prior research has shown that visual information, such as a speaker's perceived race or ethnicity, prompts listeners to expect a specific sociophonetic pattern ("social priming"). Indeed, a picture of an East Asian face may facilitate perception of second language (L2) Mandarin Chinese-accented English but interfere with perception of first language- (L1-) accented English. The present study builds on this line of inquiry, addressing the relationship between social priming effects and implicit racial/ethnic associations for L1- and L2-accented speech. For L1-accented speech, we found no priming effects when comparing White versus East Asian or Latina primes. For L2- (Mandarin Chinese-) accented speech, however, transcription accuracy was slightly better following an East Asian prime than a White prime. Across all experiments, a relationship between performance and individual differences in implicit associations emerged, but in no cases did this relationship interact with the priming manipulation. Ultimately, exploring social priming effects with additional methodological approaches, and in different populations of listeners, will help to determine whether these effects operate differently in the context of L1- and L2-accented speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, experimental
Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Kevin Walsh,David P McGovern,Jessica Dully,Simon P Kelly,Redmond G O'Connell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.91135.3

IF: 7.7

2024-04-02

eLife

Abstract:When observers have prior knowledge about the likely outcome of their perceptual decisions, they exhibit robust behavioural biases in reaction time and choice accuracy. Computational modelling typically attributes these effects to strategic adjustments in the criterion amount of evidence required to commit to a choice alternative - usually implemented by a starting point shift - but recent work suggests that expectations may also fundamentally bias the encoding of the sensory evidence itself. Here, we recorded neural activity with EEG while participants performed a contrast discrimination task with valid, invalid, or neutral probabilistic cues across multiple testing sessions. We measured sensory evidence encoding via contrast-dependent steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEP), while a read-out of criterion adjustments was provided by effector-selective mu-beta band activity over motor cortex. In keeping with prior modelling and neural recording studies, cues evoked substantial biases in motor preparation consistent with criterion adjustments, but we additionally found that the cues produced a significant modulation of the SSVEP during evidence presentation. While motor preparation adjustments were observed in the earliest trials, the sensory-level effects only emerged with extended task exposure. Our results suggest that, in addition to strategic adjustments to the decision process, probabilistic information can also induce subtle biases in the encoding of the evidence itself.

biology
Presumed innocent? How tacit assumptions of intentional structure shape moral judgment.

Sydney Levine,John Mikhail,Alan M. Leslie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000459

2018-11-01

Abstract:The presumption of innocence is not only a bedrock principle of American law, but also a fundamental human right. The psychological underpinnings of this presumption, however, are not well understood. To make progress, one important task is to explain how adults and children infer the goals and intentional structure of complex actions, especially when a single action has more than one salient effect. Many theories of moral judgment have either ignored this intention inference problem or have simply assumed a particular solution without empirical support. We propose that this problem may be solved by appealing to domain-specific prior knowledge that is either built-up over the probability of prior intentions or built-in as part of core cognition. We further propose a specific solution to this problem in the moral domain: a good intention prior, which entails a rebuttable presumption that if an action has both good and bad effects, the actor intends the good effects and not the bad effects. Finally, in a series of novel experiments we provide the first empirical support - from both adults and preschool children - for the existence of this good intention prior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Judges’ Perceptions of Systemic Racism in the Criminal Justice System

Mia Abboud Holbrook,Adam Dunbar,Monica K. Miller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687221087388

2022-03-14

Race and Justice

Abstract:Recognition of the causes and consequences of systemic racism, particularly related to the criminal justice system, has increased in recent years, in part because of the Black Lives Matter movement. Awareness of racism and how it intersects with the justice system is a first step to addressing it; thus, it is critical to understand the sentiment of justice employees regarding systemic racism. This content analysis assessed the sentiment of 632 judges who responded to The National Judicial College's Question of the Month. Approximately 65% believed that systemic racism exists in the criminal justice system. Assessment of open-ended responses revealed many themes. Some judges pointed toward disparate treatment, while others denied racism exists. Some claimed that racism occurs but is not systemic. Many said that disparities are not a result of racism, but a result of SES, education, etc. Judges specified training and reforms (e.g., bail) that are needed. Suggested solutions included increasing accountability for police, prosecutors, and judges who display discriminatory behavior. These solutions indicated that judges are amenable to training and other reforms; such policy shifts should be pursued.

criminology & penology,ethnic studies
Jury instructions should prioritize reflector variables recorded during the first test of an eyewitness' memory.

Jiaqi Huang,John T. Wixted

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000182

2024-06-22

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Abstract:Jurors tend to be insensitive to the difference between reliable versus unreliable eyewitness evidence, and jury instructions have been proposed as one way to address that problem. However, numerous studies have found that existing jury instructions are largely ineffective. Here, we test the effectiveness of instructions designed to capitalize on a new understanding of the importance of "reflector variables," namely, confidence and decision time, on the initial test of a witness' memory. In three experiments, we found that reflector variable instructions successfully sensitized participants to strong eyewitness evidence (immediate high-confidence identification at the first test followed by a high-confidence identification at trial) versus weak eyewitness evidence (hesitant low-confidence identification at the first test followed by a high-confidence identification at trial). Overall, our results provide evidence that reflector variable instructions can shift jurors' attention from the more attractive in-court identification to the more important initial identification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, experimental
Race and Stereotypes Matter When You Ask About Conduct Problems: Implications for Violence Risk Assessment in Juvenile Justice Settings

James R. Andretta,Frank C. Worrell,Katara M. Watkins,Ryan M. Sutton,Adrian D. Thompson,Malcolm H. Woodland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418821278

2019-01-01

Journal of Black Psychology

Abstract:We examined the impact of stigma priming on self-reported severe conduct problems in two studies conducted with African American adolescents involved in the juvenile justice system. Data-collection interviews were conducted in a secure detention setting following arrest. In Study 1 ( N = 193), stigma was primed by manipulating the ordering of surveys. Adolescents who completed a questionnaire about racial identity attitudes prior to questions about severe conduct reported substantively more problematic behaviors than control group peers (β = 0.43). In Study 2 ( N = 264), stigma was primed by manipulating whether adolescents were interviewed by an African American or European American mental health professional. Racial group membership of the interviewer did not have a substantial effect on self-reported conduct problems (β = −0.04). Although the studies were not without limitations, they highlight the need for more research on the degree to which interview methods and context influence self-reported severe conduct behavior in forensic settings.

psychology, multidisciplinary
The impact of misinformation presented during jury deliberation on juror memory and decision-making

Hayley J. Cullen,Natali Dilevski,Faye T. Nitschke,Gianni Ribeiro,Shobanah Brind,Nikita Woolley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1232228

IF: 3.8

2024-01-27

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:When deliberating, jurors may introduce misinformation that may influence other jurors' memory and decision-making. In two studies, we explored the impact of misinformation exposure during jury deliberation. Participants in both studies read a transcript of an alleged sexual assault. In Study 1 ( N = 275), participants encountered either consistent pro-prosecution misinformation, consistent pro-defense misinformation, or contradictory misinformation (pro-prosecution and pro-defense). In Study 2 ( N = 339), prior to encountering either pro-prosecution or pro-defense misinformation while reading a jury deliberation transcript, participants either received or did not receive a judicial instruction about misinformation exposure during deliberation. Participants in both studies completed legal decision-making variables (e.g., defendant guilt rating) before and after deliberation, and their memory was assessed for misinformation acceptance via recall and source memory tasks. In Study 1, misinformation type did not influence legal decision-making, but pro-prosecution misinformation was more likely to be misattributed as trial evidence than pro-defense or contradictory misinformation. In Study 2, pro-defense misinformation was more likely to be misattributed to the trial than pro-prosecution misinformation, and rape myths moderated this. Furthermore, exposure to pro-defense misinformation skewed legal decision-making towards the defense's case. However, the judicial instruction about misinformation exposure did not influence memory or decision-making. Together, these findings suggest that misinformation in jury deliberations may distort memory for trial evidence and bias decision-making, highlighting the need to develop effective safeguards for reducing the impact of misinformation in trial contexts.

psychology, multidisciplinary

Effects of toasting procedures on the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in toasted bread.

Prolonged postoperative apnea complicating gynecologic surgery; atypical cholinesterase and myasthenia gravis.

The effect of confirmation bias and racial stereotypes on perceptions of guilt and interrogation strategy decisions

Blinding prosecutors to defendants’ race: A policy proposal to reduce unconscious bias in the criminal justice system

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

Perceptions of Anti-Black Bias in the Criminal Justice System Contribute to Pro-Black (Versus White) Bias in Criminal Justice Research

Race, Culpability, and Defendant Plea-Bargaining Decisions: An Experimental Simulation

Rating the Honesty of White and Black Children via Implicit and Explicit Measures: Implications for Child Victims in the Criminal Justice System

The role of perceived defendant criminality on attributions and case outcomes

Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects

Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts

The biasing nature of gang evidence: inducing memory errors for evidence of past criminal behavior

Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges

Social priming of speech perception: The role of individual differences in implicit racial and ethnic associations.

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Presumed innocent? How tacit assumptions of intentional structure shape moral judgment.

Judges’ Perceptions of Systemic Racism in the Criminal Justice System

Jury instructions should prioritize reflector variables recorded during the first test of an eyewitness' memory.

Race and Stereotypes Matter When You Ask About Conduct Problems: Implications for Violence Risk Assessment in Juvenile Justice Settings

The impact of misinformation presented during jury deliberation on juror memory and decision-making