Abstract:Objective: When an officer places a suspect in an identification procedure and the witness identifies the suspect, it falls on attorneys to make decisions that reflect the strength of that identification. The factor that most affects the strength of identification evidence is the likelihood that the suspect is guilty before being subjected to the procedure, which scholars refer to as the prior probability of guilt. Given large racial disparities in exonerations based on eyewitness misidentifications, the current work examined whether defense attorneys are less sensitive to prior evidence of guilt when the defendant is Black as opposed to White. Hypotheses: We predicted that when the defendant's race was described as White rather than Black, attorneys' judgments would be more sensitive to variations in the evidence that would influence the base rate of guilt. We also predicted that attorneys would rate the case as stronger when the victim's race was described as White rather than Black. Method: We gave 316 defense attorneys case files (modeled after the New York Police Department's style) that varied the strength of the preidentification evidence (strong vs. weak), the race of the defendant (Black vs. White), and the race of the victim (Black vs. White). Results: Attorneys made judgments that were sensitive to the base rate of guilt, but self-report measures demonstrated that they did not understand the extent to which the base rate of guilt influences the reliability of eyewitness evidence. Participants also rated the strength of the preidentification evidence as stronger for Black than for White defendants. Conclusions: Although attorneys are intuitively sensitive to the strength of preidentification evidence, they lack conscious awareness of how a suspect's prior probability of guilt affects likelihood of a mistaken identification, which may have implications for their ability to make race-neutral evaluations of preidentification evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The role of perceived defendant criminality on attributions and case outcomes

Accuracy, Bias, and Overgeneralization: Perceived Aggression Guides Threat Detection and Punishment of Female Criminal Offenders

Suspect race affects defense attorney evaluations of preidentification evidence

Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States

The effect of confirmation bias and racial stereotypes on perceptions of guilt and interrogation strategy decisions

Dressing the part: The influence of police attire on outcomes in a simulated traffic violation case

Perceptions of Anti-Black Bias in the Criminal Justice System Contribute to Pro-Black (Versus White) Bias in Criminal Justice Research

Race, Culpability, and Defendant Plea-Bargaining Decisions: An Experimental Simulation

Race and Stereotypes Matter When You Ask About Conduct Problems: Implications for Violence Risk Assessment in Juvenile Justice Settings

The Interaction between Legal Representation and Extralegal Factors on Nonviolent Misdemeanor Case Outcomes

How information about perpetrators' nature and nurture influences assessments of their character, mental states, and deserved punishment

Constructing Hate Crimes: Does Respondent's Racial/Ethnic Identity Matter?

Racial Prejudice Affects Representations of Facial Trustworthiness

Innocent until primed: mock jurors' racially biased response to the presumption of innocence

Assessing Cumulative Disadvantage Against Minority Female Defendants in State Courts

Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality.

Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants

Structurally Unjust: How Lay Beliefs about Racism Relate to Perceptions of and Responses to Racial Inequality in Criminal Justice

Causal effects of perceived immutable characteristics

The perfect match: Do criminal stereotypes bias forensic evidence analysis?

What’s in a face? The role of facial features in ratings of dominance, threat, and stereotypicality