Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>Low‐dose CT screening allows early lung cancer detection, but is affected by frequent false positive results, inter/intra observer variation and uncertain diagnoses of lung nodules. Radiomics‐based models have recently been introduced to overcome these issues, but limitations in demonstrating their generalizability on independent datasets are slowing their introduction to clinic. The aim of this study is to evaluate two radiomics‐based models to classify malignant pulmonary nodules in low‐dose CT screening, and to externally validate them on an independent cohort. The effect of a radiomics‐features harmonization technique is also investigated to evaluate its impact on the classification of lung nodules from a multicenter data.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Pulmonary nodules from two independent cohorts were considered in this study; the first cohort (110 subjects, 113 nodules) was used to train prediction models, and the second cohort (72 nodules) to externally validate them. Literature‐based radiomics features were extracted and, after feature selection, used as predictive variables in models for malignancy identification. An in‐house prediction model based on artificial neural network (ANN) was implemented and evaluated, along with an alternative model from the literature, based on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). External validation was performed on the second cohort to evaluate models' generalization ability. Additionally, the impact of the Combat harmonization method was investigated to compensate for multicenter datasets variabilities. A new training of the models based on harmonized features was performed on the first cohort, then tested separately on the harmonized and no‐harmonized features of the second cohort.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Preliminary results showed a good accuracy of the investigated models in distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with both sets of radiomics features (i.e. no‐harmonized and harmonized). The performance of the models, quantified in terms of Area Under the Curve (AUC), was >0.89 in the training set and >0.82 in the external‐validation set for all the investigated scenarios, outperforming the clinical standard (AUC of 0.76). Slightly higher performance was observed for the SVM‐LASSO model than the ANN in the external dataset, although they did not result significantly different. For both harmonized and no‐harmonized features, no statistical difference was found between Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves related to training and test set for both models.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Although no significant improvements were observed when applying the Combat harmonization method, both in‐house and literature‐based models were able to classify lung nodules with good generalization to an independent dataset, thus showing their potential as tools for clinical decision‐making in lung cancer screening.</p></section>

Evaluation of radiomic feature harmonization techniques for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules

Multiclassifier Fusion Based on Radiomics Features for the Prediction of Benign and Malignant Primary Pulmonary Solid Nodules

Resampling and harmonization for mitigation of heterogeneity in image parameters of baseline scans

Impact of feature harmonization on radiogenomics analysis: Prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutations from non-small cell lung cancer PET/CT images

CT-based Radiomic Signatures for Predicting Histopathologic Features in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Magnetic resonance radiomic feature performance in pulmonary nodule classification and impact of segmentation variability on radiomics

Differentiation of Pulmonary Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma and Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma by Radiomics

External validation of radiomics‐based predictive models in low‐dose CT screening for early lung cancer diagnosis

Deep learning-based harmonization of CT reconstruction kernels towards improved clinical task performance

A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET

Radiomics Analysis of Pulmonary Nodules in Low Dose CT for Early Detection of Lung Cancer

Establishment and verification of a prediction model based on clinical characteristics and computed tomography radiomics parameters for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules

Preoperatively Estimating the Malignant Potential of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes: A Pilot Study Toward Establishing a Robust Radiomics Model Based on Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging

CT-based conventional radiomics and quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting benign and malignant renal lesions

Optimal batch determination for improved harmonization and prognostication of multi-center PET/CT radiomics feature in head and neck cancer

The Value of Radiomics Based on Dual-Energy CT for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules.

Distinguishing Multiple Primary Lung Cancers from Intrapulmonary Metastasis Using CT-based Radiomics

Application Potential of Radiomics Based on the Unenhanced CT Image for the Identification of Benign or Malignant Pulmonary Nodules.

Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules by Radiologists vs. Radiomics in Stand-Alone and Complementary CT and MRI

Radiomics analysis to predict pulmonary nodule malignancy using machine learning approaches

Generalization optimizing machine learning to improve CT scan radiomics and assess immune checkpoint inhibitors' response in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter cohort study