Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>Low‐dose CT screening allows early lung cancer detection, but is affected by frequent false positive results, inter/intra observer variation and uncertain diagnoses of lung nodules. Radiomics‐based models have recently been introduced to overcome these issues, but limitations in demonstrating their generalizability on independent datasets are slowing their introduction to clinic. The aim of this study is to evaluate two radiomics‐based models to classify malignant pulmonary nodules in low‐dose CT screening, and to externally validate them on an independent cohort. The effect of a radiomics‐features harmonization technique is also investigated to evaluate its impact on the classification of lung nodules from a multicenter data.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Pulmonary nodules from two independent cohorts were considered in this study; the first cohort (110 subjects, 113 nodules) was used to train prediction models, and the second cohort (72 nodules) to externally validate them. Literature‐based radiomics features were extracted and, after feature selection, used as predictive variables in models for malignancy identification. An in‐house prediction model based on artificial neural network (ANN) was implemented and evaluated, along with an alternative model from the literature, based on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). External validation was performed on the second cohort to evaluate models' generalization ability. Additionally, the impact of the Combat harmonization method was investigated to compensate for multicenter datasets variabilities. A new training of the models based on harmonized features was performed on the first cohort, then tested separately on the harmonized and no‐harmonized features of the second cohort.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Preliminary results showed a good accuracy of the investigated models in distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with both sets of radiomics features (i.e. no‐harmonized and harmonized). The performance of the models, quantified in terms of Area Under the Curve (AUC), was >0.89 in the training set and >0.82 in the external‐validation set for all the investigated scenarios, outperforming the clinical standard (AUC of 0.76). Slightly higher performance was observed for the SVM‐LASSO model than the ANN in the external dataset, although they did not result significantly different. For both harmonized and no‐harmonized features, no statistical difference was found between Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves related to training and test set for both models.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Although no significant improvements were observed when applying the Combat harmonization method, both in‐house and literature‐based models were able to classify lung nodules with good generalization to an independent dataset, thus showing their potential as tools for clinical decision‐making in lung cancer screening.</p></section>

Radiomics analysis to predict pulmonary nodule malignancy using machine learning approaches

Multiclassifier Fusion Based on Radiomics Features for the Prediction of Benign and Malignant Primary Pulmonary Solid Nodules

Radiomics Analysis of Pulmonary Nodules in Low Dose CT for Early Detection of Lung Cancer

Radiomic-Based Quantitative CT Analysis of Pure Ground-Glass Nodules to Predict the Invasiveness of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Quantitative Analysis of Chest MRI Images for Benign Malignant Diagnosis of Pulmonary Solid Nodules

Preoperative diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules in lung cancer screening with a radiomics nomogram

Machine learning approach for distinguishing malignant and benign lung nodules utilizing standardized perinodular parenchymal features from CT.

A Comparative Study of Radiomics and Deep-Learning Based Methods for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Prediction in Low Dose CT Images

Establishment and verification of a prediction model based on clinical characteristics and computed tomography radiomics parameters for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules

Magnetic resonance radiomic feature performance in pulmonary nodule classification and impact of segmentation variability on radiomics

External validation of radiomics‐based predictive models in low‐dose CT screening for early lung cancer diagnosis

An Effective Malignancy Prediction Model for Incidentally Detected Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules Based on Current and Prior CT Scans.

Radiomics as a non-invasive adjunct to Chest CT in distinguishing benign and malignant lung nodules

A comprehensive nomogram combining CT-based radiomics with clinical features for differentiation of benign and malignant lung subcentimeter solid nodules

Potential of radiomics analysis and machine learning for predicting brain metastasis in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients

Predicting Benign, Preinvasive, and Invasive Lung Nodules on Computed Tomography Scans Using Machine Learning

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Radiomics Model to Predict High-Risk Pathologic Pulmonary Nodules Using Preoperative Computed Tomography

A machine learning–based multidimensional model integrating clinical, radiomics, and cell-free DNA methylation biomarkers for the classification of pulmonary nodules.

A prediction model based on DNA methylation biomarkers and radiological characteristics for identifying malignant from benign pulmonary nodules

Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules by Radiologists vs. Radiomics in Stand-Alone and Complementary CT and MRI

Decoding pulmonary nodules: can machine learning enhance malignancy risk stratification?