Abstract:Can Large Language Models (LLMs) accurately predict election outcomes? While LLMs have demonstrated impressive performance in various domains, including healthcare, legal analysis, and creative tasks, their ability to forecast elections remains unknown. Election prediction poses unique challenges, such as limited voter-level data, rapidly changing political landscapes, and the need to model complex human behavior. To address these challenges, we introduce a multi-step reasoning framework designed for political analysis. Our approach is validated on real-world data from the American National Election Studies (ANES) 2016 and 2020, as well as synthetic personas generated by the leading machine learning framework, offering scalable datasets for voter behavior modeling. To capture temporal dynamics, we incorporate candidates' policy positions and biographical details, ensuring that the model adapts to evolving political contexts. Drawing on Chain of Thought prompting, our multi-step reasoning pipeline systematically integrates demographic, ideological, and time-dependent factors, enhancing the model's predictive power.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to explore whether large - language models (LLMs) can accurately predict the results of the U.S. presidential elections. Although LLMs perform well in multiple fields (such as healthcare, legal analysis, and creative tasks, etc.), their performance in predicting elections remains unknown. Election prediction faces unique challenges, including limited voter - level data, a rapidly changing political environment, and the need to model complex human behavior.
#### Main problems
1. **Lack of voter - level data**: Obtaining detailed voter data is costly, which makes it difficult to experiment with and validate models.
2. **Time - dependence and political dynamics**: Unlike many other prediction tasks, election prediction requires not only modeling the behavior of individual voters but also that of candidates, and these behaviors change over time.
3. **Complex reasoning requirements**: Accurate election prediction requires going beyond simple inference and integrating multiple factors, such as economic trends, political events, and demographic changes.
#### Solutions
To solve these problems, the author proposes a novel approach that takes advantage of LLMs and alleviates the limitations of data availability, time - dependence factors, and complex political dynamics:
1. **Using a synthetic data generation framework**: Reconstruct individual - level socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics probabilistically from aggregated public datasets through the SynC framework to overcome the scarcity of detailed voter data. At the same time, combine real - world datasets, such as the American National Election Studies (ANES) 2020 time series, to ensure that the method reflects real voting behavior.
2. **Introducing time - dependence factors**: Adapt the model to the changing political environment by aggregating presidential campaign data, such as candidates' policy agendas and background information.
3. **Multi - step reasoning framework**: Inspired by the Chain of Thought prompt, this framework breaks down the prediction process into intermediate steps, systematically integrating demographic information, ideological alignment, and time - sensitive factors, thereby improving the model's accuracy and reducing the bias and over - fitting problems in simple methods.
#### Technical contributions
- **The first large - scale LLM - based election prediction framework**: Demonstrates how to use LLMs in combination with real - world data and synthetic data to simulate voter behavior and capture voter - level dynamics.
- **A new multi - step reasoning framework**: Specifically designed for political prediction, enhancing the model's ability to integrate and analyze more than 11 key time - sensitive features.
- **New insights and future directions**: Reveals the advantages and limitations of LLMs in election prediction and proposes future research directions, such as integrating multiple LLMs for comparative analysis and further optimizing prompts to improve the reliability and robustness of prediction.
Through these methods, the author hopes to demonstrate the potential of LLMs in handling complex election prediction tasks and provide new ideas and technical means for future research.