Abstract:In the rapidly evolving field of Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a critical need to thoroughly analyze their capabilities and risks. Central to our investigation are two novel elements. Firstly, it is the innovative parallels between the statistical patterns of word relationships within LLMs and Martin Heidegger's concepts of "ready-to-hand" and "present-at-hand," which encapsulate the utilitarian and scientific altitudes humans employ in interacting with the world. This comparison lays the groundwork for positioning LLMs as the digital counterpart to the Faculty of Verbal Knowledge, shedding light on their capacity to emulate certain facets of human reasoning. Secondly, a structural analysis of human reasoning, viewed through Heidegger's notion of truth as "unconcealment" is conducted This foundational principle enables us to map out the inputs and outputs of the reasoning system and divide reasoning into four distinct categories. Respective cognitive faculties are delineated, allowing us to place LLMs within the broader schema of human reasoning, thus clarifying their strengths and inherent limitations. Our findings reveal that while LLMs possess the capability for Direct Explicative Reasoning and Pseudo Rational Reasoning, they fall short in authentic rational reasoning and have no creative reasoning capabilities, due to the current lack of many analogous AI models such as the Faculty of Judgement. The potential and risks of LLMs when they are augmented with other AI technologies are also evaluated. The results indicate that although LLMs have achieved proficiency in some reasoning abilities, the aspiration to match or exceed human intellectual capabilities is yet unattained. This research not only enriches our comprehension of LLMs but also propels forward the discourse on AI's potential and its bounds, paving the way for future explorations into AI's evolving landscape.

Large Language Models Can Argue in Convincing Ways About Politics, But Humans Dislike AI Authors: implications for Governance

Large Language Models can impersonate politicians and other public figures

Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM arguments

Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators

Large Language Models in Politics and Democracy: A Comprehensive Survey

Can Language Models Recognize Convincing Arguments?

Large Language Models as Instruments of Power: New Regimes of Autonomous Manipulation and Control

Limits of Large Language Models in Debating Humans

Vox Populi, Vox ChatGPT: Large Language Models, Education and Democracy

LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision Making

Large Language Model Soft Ideologization via AI-Self-Consciousness

Large language models can consistently generate high-quality content for election disinformation operations

Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey

The Persuasive Power of Large Language Models

Large Language Models Can Be Used to Estimate the Latent Positions of Politicians

Large Language Models Assume People are More Rational than We Really are

Should We Fear Large Language Models? A Structural Analysis of the Human Reasoning System for Elucidating LLM Capabilities and Risks Through the Lens of Heidegger's Philosophy

Large Language Models respond to Influence like Humans

From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis

Whose Side Are You On? Investigating the Political Stance of Large Language Models

On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial