Abstract:Logical reasoning consistently plays a fundamental and significant role in the domains of knowledge engineering and artificial intelligence. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a noteworthy innovation in natural language processing (NLP). However, the question of whether LLMs can effectively address the task of logical reasoning, which requires gradual cognitive inference similar to human intelligence, remains unanswered. To this end, we aim to bridge this gap and provide comprehensive evaluations in this paper. Firstly, to offer systematic evaluations, we select fifteen typical logical reasoning datasets and organize them into deductive, inductive, abductive and mixed-form reasoning settings. Considering the comprehensiveness of evaluations, we include 3 early-era representative LLMs and 4 trending LLMs. Secondly, different from previous evaluations relying only on simple metrics (e.g., \emph{accuracy}), we propose fine-level evaluations in objective and subjective manners, covering both answers and explanations, including \emph{answer correctness}, \emph{explain correctness}, \emph{explain completeness} and \emph{explain redundancy}. Additionally, to uncover the logical flaws of LLMs, problematic cases will be attributed to five error types from two dimensions, i.e., \emph{evidence selection process} and \emph{reasoning process}. Thirdly, to avoid the influences of knowledge bias and concentrate purely on benchmarking the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a new dataset with neutral content. Based on the in-depth evaluations, this paper finally forms a general evaluation scheme of logical reasoning capability from six dimensions (i.e., \emph{Correct}, \emph{Rigorous}, \emph{Self-aware}, \emph{Active}, \emph{Oriented} and \emph{No hallucination}). It reflects the pros and cons of LLMs and gives guiding directions for future works.

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Large Language Models for Deductive Reasoning.

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models

Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction

Can Large Language Models Act as Symbolic Reasoners?

LLMs for Relational Reasoning: How Far are We?

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge

Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond

Can Large Language Models Reason? A Characterization via 3-SAT

Large Language Models Are In-Context Semantic Reasoners Rather Than Symbolic Reasoners

Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning

Reasoning Factual Knowledge in Structured Data with Large Language Models

Struct-X: Enhancing Large Language Models Reasoning with Structured Data

Meta-Reasoning: Semantics-Symbol Deconstruction for Large Language Models

Coupling Large Language Models with Logic Programming for Robust and General Reasoning from Text

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey

Can LLMs Fix Issues with Reasoning Models? Towards More Likely Models for AI Planning

Exploring the Role of Reasoning Structures for Constructing Proofs in Multi-Step Natural Language Reasoning with Large Language Models

Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models

Can LLMs Reason in the Wild with Programs?

Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoning