Abstract:Gravitational waves (GW) from chirping binary black holes (BBHs) provide unique opportunities to test general relativity (GR) in the strong-field regime. However, testing GR can be challenging when incomplete physical modeling of the expected signal gives rise to systematic biases. In this study, we investigate the potential influence of wave effects in gravitational lensing (which we refer to as microlensing) on tests of GR using GWs for the first time. We utilize an isolated point-lens model for microlensing with the lens mass ranging from $10-10^5~$M$_\odot$ and base our conclusions on an astrophysically motivated population of BBHs in the LIGO-Virgo detector network. Our analysis centers on two theory-agnostic tests of gravity: the inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency test (IMRCT) and the parameterized tests. Our findings reveal two key insights: First, microlensing can significantly bias GR tests, with a confidence level exceeding $5\sigma$. Notably, substantial deviations from GR $(\sigma > 3)$ tend to align with a strong preference for microlensing over an unlensed signal, underscoring the need for microlensing analysis before claiming any erroneous GR deviations. Nonetheless, we do encounter scenarios where deviations from GR remain significant ($1 < \sigma < 3$), yet the Bayes factor lacks the strength to confidently assert microlensing. Second, deviations from GR correlate with pronounced interference effects, which appear when the GW frequency ($f_\mathrm{GW}$) aligns with the inverse time delay between microlens-induced images ($t_\mathrm{d}$). These false deviations peak in the wave-dominated region and fade where $f_\mathrm{GW}\cdot t_\mathrm{d}$ significantly deviates from unity. Our findings apply broadly to any microlensing scenario, extending beyond specific models and parameter spaces, as we relate the observed biases to the fundamental characteristics of lensing.

Millilensing induced systematic biases in parameterized tests of General Relativity

Unveiling Microlensing Biases in Testing General Relativity with Gravitational Waves

Systematic biases in parametrized tests of general relativity due to waveform mismodeling: the impact of neglecting spin precession and higher modes

Effect of Deviations from General Relativity on Searches for Gravitational Wave Microlensing and Type II Strong Lensing

Impact of selection biases on tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave inspirals

The impact of selection biases on tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave inspirals

Eccentricity-induced systematic error on parametrized tests of general relativity: Hierarchical Bayesian inference applied to a binary black hole population

Impact of Overlapping Signals on Parameterized Post-Newtonian Coefficients in Tests of Gravity

A robust test of general relativity at the galactic scales by combining strong lensing systems and gravitational wave standard sirens

On the Potential Observation of False Deviations from General Relativity in Gravitational Wave Observations from Binary Black Holes

Invariance transformations in wave-optics lensing: implications for gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology

Robust test of general relativity at the galactic scales by combining strong lensing systems and gravitational wave standard sirens

Tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime: a parametrized plunge-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model

Exploring the impact of microlensing on Gravitational Wave signals: Biases, population characteristics, and prospects for detection

Systematics in tests of general relativity using LISA massive black hole binaries

Effect of Ignoring Eccentricity in Testing General Relativity with Gravitational Waves

Microlensing bias on the detection of strong lensing gravitational wave