Rohit S. Chandramouli,Kaitlyn Prokup,Emanuele Berti,Nicolás Yunes
Abstract:We study the robustness of parametrized tests of General Relativity (GR) with gravitational waves due to waveform inaccuracy. In particular, we determine the properties of the signal (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and source parameters) such that we are led to falsely identify a GR deviation due to neglecting spin precession or higher models in the recovery model. To characterize the statistical significance of the biases, we compute the Bayes factor between the non-GR and GR models, and the fitting factor of the non-GR model. For highly-precessing, edge-on signals, we find that mismodeling the signal leads to a significant systematic bias in the recovery of the non-GR parameter, even at an SNR of 30. However, these biased inferences are characterized by a significant loss of SNR and a weak preference for the non-GR model (over the GR model). At a higher SNR, the biased inferences display a strong preference for the non-GR model (over the GR model) and a significant loss of SNR. For edge-on signals containing asymmetric masses, at an SNR of 30, we find that excluding higher modes does not impact the ppE tests as much as excluding spin precession. Our analysis, therefore, identifies the spin-precessing and mass-asymmetric systems for which parametrized tests of GR are robust. With a toy model and using the linear signal approximation, we illustrate these regimes of bias and characterize them by obtaining bounds on the ratio of systematic to statistical error and the effective cycles incurred due to mismodeling. As a by-product of our analysis, we explicitly connect different measures and techniques commonly used to estimate systematic errors -- linear-signal approximation, Laplace approximation, fitting factor, effective cycles, and Bayes factor -- that are generally applicable to all studies of systematic uncertainties in gravitational wave parameter estimation.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena,Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the systematic deviation in the parameterization test of general relativity (GR) in gravitational - wave signal analysis due to inaccurate waveform modeling. Specifically, the authors studied the effects of ignoring spin precession or higher - order modes on the signal in the recovery model, which may lead to the misidentification of deviations from general relativity. By calculating the Bayes factor between non - GR models and GR models and the fitting factor of non - GR models, the authors evaluated the statistical significance of these systematic deviations. For high signal - to - noise ratio (SNR) signals, especially those that are highly precessing and are observed almost edge - on, ignoring these effects will lead to significant systematic deviations, even when the SNR is 30. In addition, for edge - on signals with asymmetric masses, the effect of ignoring higher - order modes is not as large as that of ignoring spin precession.
### Main problems of the paper
1. **How to evaluate the statistical significance of systematic deviations in GR parameterization tests?**
- Systematic deviations are significant when inferring deviations from general relativity when the systematic error of the parameterized post - Einstein (ppE) parameter exceeds the statistical error. At this time, we say that this is an "unequivocal non - GR deviation inference". If the systematic deviation of the ppE parameter is significant, there may be a "possible spurious GR deviation inference". By calculating the fitting factor of the ppE model (FFppE) and the Bayes factor between the ppE model and the GR model (BFppE/GR), the statistical significance of this "possible spurious GR deviation inference" can be evaluated.
2. **How does the systematic deviation depend on the specific parameters of the ignored GR effects, the SNR of the signal, and the post - Newtonian (PN) order of the ppE deviation?**
- The authors studied the deviations caused by ignoring spin precession or higher - order modes through detailed Bayesian parameter estimation. The study found that even when the SNR is 30, when the spin is mainly located in the orbital plane and the binary is observed almost edge - on, there are still systematic deviations caused by precession in the ppE tests at - 1PN, 1PN, and 2PN orders. At the same SNR, the effect of ignoring higher - order modes is not as large as that of ignoring spin precession. However, as the mass ratio increases, especially for ppE tests at low PN orders, the deviation will be larger. Therefore, the study determined in which systems it is crucial to conduct ppE tests that include spin precession.
### Formula examples
- **Threshold of the effective number of periods** \( N_e \):
\[
N_e \lesssim 0.02 \sqrt{\frac{N_M}{15}} \left(\frac{30}{\rho}\right)
\]
where \( N_M \) is the number of waveform parameters and \( \rho \) is the signal - to - noise ratio (SNR). When this condition is met, the systematic error is less than the statistical error, which is at the 1 - sigma confidence level.
- **Condition for strong preference for the ppE model**:
\[
N_e \gtrsim N_{\text{thresh}}^e = 0.03 \left(\frac{30}{\rho}\right) \left[\log \left( \frac{BF_{\text{thresh}} \sqrt{2\pi}}{O_p} \right)\right]^{1/2} \left(\frac{I_{\text{thresh}}}{4}\right)
\]
where \( O_p \) is the Occam penalty term, \( BF_{\text{thresh}} \) is the selected Bayes factor threshold, and \( I_{\text{thresh}} \) is another function that depends on the ppE exponent and the type of GR partial modeling error.
Through these studies, the authors aim to improve the robustness of using gravitational waves to detect fundamental physics and distinguish between true GR deviations and spurious GR deviations.