Abstract:Most gravitational wave (GW) events observed so far by the LIGO and Virgo detectors are consistent with mergers of binary black holes (BBHs) on quasicircular orbits. However, some events, such as GW190521, are also consistent with having nonzero orbital eccentricity at detection, which can indicate that the binary formed via dynamical interactions. Active GW search pipelines employing quasicircular waveform templates are inefficient for detecting eccentric mergers. Additionally, analysis of GW signals from eccentric BBH with waveform models neglecting eccentricity can lead to biases in the recovered parameters. Here, we explore the detectability and characterization of eccentric signals when searches and analyses rely on quasicircular waveform models. We find that for a reference eccentric population, the fraction of events having fitting factor (FF) <0.95 can be up to ≈2.2% compared to ≈0.4% for the baseline population. This results in the loss in signal recovery fraction for up to 6% for the region in parameter space with non-negligible eccentricity ( e10>0.01 ) and high mass ratio ( q>3 ). We perform parameter estimation (PE) for nonspinning and aligned-spin eccentric injections of GWs from binaries of total mass M=35M⊙ , based on numerical relativity simulations and an effective one-body (EOB) based inspiral merger-ringdown model ( teobresums ), and recover them using both quasicircular and eccentric waveform models. For e20∼0.1 , analyses using quasicircular waveform models are unable to recover the injected chirp mass within the 90% credible interval. Further, for these low-mass injections, spin-induced precession does not mimic eccentricity, with PE correctly ruling out high values of effective precession parameter χp . For injections of e20∼0.1 , PE conducted with an inspiral-only eccentric waveform model correctly characterizes the injected signal to within 90% confidence, and recovers the injected eccentricities, suggesting that such models are sufficient for characterization of low-mass eccentric BBH. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043037 © 2024 American Physical Society

Systematic bias due to mismodelling precessing binary black hole ringdown

Systematic bias from waveform modeling for binary black hole populations in next-generation gravitational wave detectors

Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models

Enriching the Symphony of Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics

Systematic biases in parametrized tests of general relativity due to waveform mismodeling: the impact of neglecting spin precession and higher modes

Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach

Systematic errors in measuring parameters of non-spinning compact binary coalescences with post-Newtonian templates

A Survey of Four Precessing Waveform Models for Binary Black Hole Systems

Survey of four precessing waveform models for binary black hole systems

Accurate and Efficient Waveform Model for Precessing Binary Black Holes

Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations

A phenomenological gravitational waveform model of binary black holes incorporating horizon fluxes

ESIGMAHM: An Eccentric, Spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model with Higher Modes for the detection and characterization of binary black holes

Blind spots and biases: The dangers of ignoring eccentricity in gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes

An improved IMR model for BBHs on elliptical orbits

Phenomenological gravitational-wave model for precessing black-hole binaries with higher multipoles and asymmetries

Incorporating waveform calibration error in gravitational-wave modeling and inference for SEOBNRv4