Exploring the impact of microlensing on Gravitational Wave signals: Biases, population characteristics, and prospects for detection

Anuj Mishra,Ashish Kumar Meena,Anupreeta More,Sukanta Bose
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae836
IF: 4.8
2024-03-22
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:Abstract In this study, we investigate the impact of microlensing on gravitational wave (GW) signals in the LIGO−Virgo sensitivity band. Microlensing caused by an isolated point lens, with (redshifted) mass ranging from MLz ∈ (1, 105) M⊙ and impact parameter y ∈ (0.01, 5), can result in a maximum mismatch of $\sim 30~{{\%}}$ with their unlensed counterparts. When y < 1, it strongly anti-correlates with the luminosity distance enhancing the detection horizon and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Biases in inferred source parameters are assessed, with in-plane spin components being the most affected intrinsic parameters. The luminosity distance is often underestimated, while sky-localisation and trigger times are mostly well-recovered. Study of a population of microlensed signals due to an isolated point lens primarily reveals: (i) using unlensed templates during the search causes fractional loss (20 % to 30 %) of potentially identifiable microlensed signals; (ii) the observed distribution of y challenges the notion of its high improbability at low values (y ≲ 1), especially for y ≲ 0.1; (iii) Bayes factor analysis of the population indicates that certain region in MLz − y parameter space have a higher probability of being detected and accurately identified as microlensed. Notably, the microlens parameters for the most compelling candidate identified in previous microlensing searches, GW200208_130117, fall within a 1-sigma range of the aforementioned higher probability region. Identifying microlensing signatures from MLz < 100 M⊙ remains challenging due to small microlensing effects at typical SNR values. Additionally, we also examined how microlensing from a population of microlenses influences the detection of strong lensing signatures in pairs of GW events, particularly in the posterior-overlap analysis.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?