Opinion dynamics model of collaborative learning

Jibeom Seo,Beom Jun Kim

2024-10-23

Abstract:We propose a simple model to explore an educational phenomenon where the correct answer emerges from group discussion. We construct our model based on several plausible assumptions: (i) We tend to follow peers' opinions. However, if a peer's opinion is too different from yours, you are not much influenced. In other words, your opinion tends to align with peers' opinions, weighted by the similarity to yours. (ii) Discussion among group members helps the opinion to shift toward the correct answer even when the group members do not know it clearly. However, if everyone tells exactly the same, you often get lost and it becomes more difficult to find the correct answer. In other words, you can find the correct answer when everyone has largely different voices. (iii) We are sometimes stuck to our past. If you keep one opinion for a long time, such a memory works like an inertia in classical mechanics. We use our model to perform numerical investigations and find that the performance of a group is enhanced when initial opinions are diverse, that a lower memory capacity makes consensus occur faster, and that a small group size, typically three or four, is beneficial for better group performance.

Physics and Society,Physics Education

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to find the correct answer from incorrect initial opinions through group discussion in the process of collaborative learning. Specifically, the researchers proposed a simple model based on Agent - Based Modeling (ABM) to explore this process in educational phenomena. The model assumptions are as follows:

1. **Opinion convergence with limits**: People tend to follow the opinions of their peers, but if the peers' opinions are too different from their own, the influence will be smaller. This means that personal opinions will be weighted and adjusted according to the similarity with the peers' opinions.
2. **Discussion helps approach the correct answer**: Even if the group members are not clear about the correct answer, the discussion can also make the opinions move closer to the correct answer. However, if everyone holds exactly the same opinion, it is difficult to find the correct answer.
3. **Memory effect**: Maintaining an opinion for a long time will produce an inertial effect similar to that in classical mechanics, making it more difficult to change the opinion.

The researchers verified the effectiveness of the model through numerical simulation and found the following conclusions:
- The diversity of initial opinions can improve the overall performance of the group.
- A lower memory capacity will make the consensus form more quickly.
- When the group size is 3 to 4 people, it is most beneficial to improve the group performance.

These findings are of great significance for understanding the dynamic processes in collaborative learning and how to promote learning through group discussion.