Abstract:Modelling efforts in opinion dynamics have to a large extent ignored that opinion exchange between individuals can also have an effect on how willing they are to express their opinion publicly. Here, we introduce a model of public opinion expression. Two groups of agents with different opinion on an issue interact with each other, changing the willingness to express their opinion according to whether they perceive themselves as part of the majority or minority opinion. We formulate the model as a multi-group majority game and investigate the Nash equilibria. We also provide a dynamical systems perspective: Using the reinforcement learning algorithm of $Q$-learning, we reduce the $N$-agent system in a mean-field approach to two dimensions which represent the two opinion groups. This two-dimensional system is analyzed in a comprehensive bifurcation analysis of its parameters. The model identifies social-structural conditions for public opinion predominance of different groups. Among other findings, we show under which circumstances a minority can dominate public discourse.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: In opinion dynamics models, the exchange of opinions between individuals not only affects their opinions on a particular issue but also influences their willingness to publicly express these opinions. Specifically, the paper introduces a public opinion expression model to study how two groups with different opinions change their willingness to publicly express their opinions through interaction, especially when they perceive themselves as belonging to the majority or minority opinion. By constructing a multi-group majority game model and analyzing it from the perspectives of Nash equilibrium and dynamical systems, the paper aims to identify the social structural conditions that lead to different groups dominating public discourse, particularly exploring under what circumstances minority groups can dominate public discourse. ### Background and Problem of the Paper 1. **Opinion Dynamics Model**: Traditional opinion dynamics models mainly focus on the changes in individual opinions but neglect the impact of whether individuals are willing to publicly express these opinions. 2. **Importance of Opinion Expression**: Whether individuals are willing to publicly express their opinions has a profound impact on the perception of the opinion climate in a social system. Even if the majority holds a certain view, if they are unwilling to express it publicly, this view may be marginalized. 3. **Spiral of Silence Theory**: Noelle-Neumann's "Spiral of Silence" theory suggests that people adjust their public expression behavior based on the surrounding opinion environment to avoid a sense of isolation. This leads to seemingly majority opinions becoming louder, while minority opinions become increasingly silent. ### Research Objectives - **Model Construction**: Develop a model to study the behavior of opinion expression rather than the change in opinions themselves. - **Condition Analysis**: Identify the social structural conditions that lead to different groups dominating public discourse. - **Influence of Minority Groups**: Explore under what circumstances minority groups can dominate public discourse. ### Methods and Results - **Multi-group Majority Game Model**: Model two groups with different opinions as a multi-group majority game and study its Nash equilibrium. - **Dynamical Systems Analysis**: Use the Q-learning algorithm to simplify the system of N agents into a two-dimensional system and conduct a comprehensive parameter bifurcation analysis. - **Bifurcation and Stability Analysis**: Study the impact of different parameters (such as internal connection strength, external connection strength, expression cost, etc.) on system stability and fixed points through bifurcation analysis. ### Main Findings - **Social Structural Conditions**: Different social structural conditions (such as internal connection strength, external connection strength) affect the performance of different groups in public discourse. - **Dominance of Minority Groups**: Under certain conditions, even if the number of minority group members is small, they can dominate public discourse through stronger internal connections and active feedback mechanisms. In summary, this paper reveals the impact of social structural conditions on the performance of different groups in public discourse by constructing and analyzing an opinion expression model, particularly exploring how minority groups can dominate public discourse under specific conditions.

The dynamics of opinion expression

Opinion Polarization by Learning from Social Feedback

Oscillatory and Excitable Dynamics in an Opinion Model with Group Opinions

$N$-player game formulation of the majority-vote model of opinion dynamics

Opinion dynamics beyond social influence

Asynchronous opinion dynamics in social networks

Think then act or act then think?

Opinion dynamics with disagreement and modulated information

Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics

Evolution of Social Power for Opinion Dynamics Networks

Opinion Dynamics Incorporating Higher-Order Interactions

An evolutionary game theory model of binary opinion formation

Bargaining Models in Opinion Dynamics

Opinion dynamics: inhomogeneous Boltzmann-type equations modelling opinion leadership and political segregation

Game-theoretical approach for opinion dynamics on social networks

Opinion dynamics on dense dynamic random graphs

Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems with Binary Decision Exchanges

Opinion-Climate-Based Hegselmann-Krause Dynamics

Opinion Dynamics and Collective Decisions

When Pull Turns to Shove: A Continuous-Time Model for Opinion Dynamics