Abstract:In this comment, we obtain the complete energy levels for Dvornikov's paper, that is, the energy levels dependent on two quantum numbers, namely, the radial quantum number (given by $N$) and the angular quantum number (given by $J_z$). In particular, what motivated us to do this was the fact that the quantized energy levels for particles (fermions or bosons) in polar, cylindrical, or spherical coordinates depend on two quantum numbers: a radial quantum number and an angular quantum number. From this, the following question/doubt arose: Why do the energy levels in Dvornikov's paper only depend on one quantum number? That is, Where did the angular quantum number given by $J_z$ go? So, using Studenikin's paper as a starting point (as well as others in the literature), we write one of the equations from Dvornikov's paper in a matrix form. Next, we use the four-component Dirac spinor and obtain a set/system of four coupled first-order differential equations. From the first two equations with $m\simeq 0$, we obtain a (compact) second-order differential equation for two spinor components. So, solving this equation, we obtain the neutrino energy levels, which explicitly depend on both $N$ and $J_z$. Finally, we note that for $J_z>0$ (positive angular momentum) with $u=+1$ (component $\psi_3$), we obtain exactly the particular energy levels of Dvornikov's paper.

Reply to Comment on "Neutrino oscillations originate from virtual excitation of Z bosons" and "Neutrinos produced from $β$ decays of neutrons cannot be in coherent superpositions of different mass eigenstates"

Reply to Comment on "Neutrino oscillations originate from virtual excitation of Z bosons" and "Neutrinos produced from $β$ decays of neutrons cannot be in coherent superpositions of different mass eigenstates"

Comment on "Neutrino oscillations originate from virtual excitation of $Z$ bosons" and "Neutrinos produced from $β$ decays of neutrons cannot be in coherent superpositions of different mass eigenstates"

Quantum coherence between mass eigenstates of a neutrino cannot be destroyed by its mass-momentum entanglement

Quantum coherence between mass eigenstates of a neutrino can be destroyed by its mass-momentum entanglement

Neutrinos produced from $β$ decays of neutrons cannot be in coherent superpositions of different mass eigenstates

Remark on neutrino oscillations

Antineutrinos produced from $β$ decays of neutrons cannot be in coherent superpositions of different mass eigenstates

Neutrino Oscillations by a Manifestly Coherent Mechanism and Massless vs. Massive Neutrinos

Comment on "Neutrino interaction with matter in a noninertial frame"

The effect of neutrino quantum decoherence

Comment on "A try for dark energy in quantum field theory: The vacuum energy of neutrino field"

Reply to the Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay" [Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16(2001)2409]

Hypothesis of a new fundamental interaction versus the particle oscillation concept

Comment on "New method for studying neutrino mixing and mass differences"

Quantum coherence and entanglement in neutral-current neutrino oscillation in matter

Neutrino Flavour Waves Through the Quantum Vacuum: A Theory of Oscillations

Quantum Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect

Once-in-a-lifetime encounter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscillations to flavor equilibration