Nteasee: A mixed methods study of expert and general population perspectives on deploying AI for health in African countries

Mercy Nyamewaa Asiedu,Iskandar Haykel,Awa Dieng,Kerrie Kauer,Tousif Ahmed,Florence Ofori,Charisma Chan,Stephen Pfohl,Negar Rostamzadeh,Katherine Heller

2024-10-16

Abstract:Artificial Intelligence (AI) for health has the potential to significantly change and improve healthcare. However in most African countries, identifying culturally and contextually attuned approaches for deploying these solutions is not well understood. To bridge this gap, we conduct a qualitative study to investigate the best practices, fairness indicators, and potential biases to mitigate when deploying AI for health in African countries, as well as explore opportunities where artificial intelligence could make a positive impact in health. We used a mixed methods approach combining in-depth interviews (IDIs) and surveys. We conduct 1.5-2 hour long IDIs with 50 experts in health, policy, and AI across 17 countries, and through an inductive approach we conduct a qualitative thematic analysis on expert IDI responses. We administer a blinded 30-minute survey with case studies to 672 general population participants across 5 countries in Africa and analyze responses on quantitative scales, statistically comparing responses by country, age, gender, and level of familiarity with AI. We thematically summarize open-ended responses from surveys. Our results find generally positive attitudes, high levels of trust, accompanied by moderate levels of concern among general population participants for AI usage for health in Africa. This contrasts with expert responses, where major themes revolved around trust/mistrust, ethical concerns, and systemic barriers to integration, among others. This work presents the first-of-its-kind qualitative research study of the potential of AI for health in Africa from an algorithmic fairness angle, with perspectives from both experts and the general population. We hope that this work guides policymakers and drives home the need for further research and the inclusion of general population perspectives in decision-making around AI usage.

Machine Learning,Artificial Intelligence,Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issue of cultural and contextual adaptability when deploying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the health sector in African countries. Specifically, the research objectives are:

1. **Best Practices, Fairness Metrics, and Mitigation of Potential Biases**: Investigate the best practices, fairness metrics, and potential biases that need to be mitigated when deploying AI health solutions in African countries.
2. **Opportunities for Positive Impact**: Explore opportunities where AI can play a positive role in the health sector.
3. **Current Health Inequalities and Solutions**: Understand the current state of health inequalities and general approaches to addressing these inequalities.
4. **Perceptions and Development Opportunities of AI and Healthcare**: Explore people's perceptions of AI and healthcare and the opportunities for development.
5. **Impact of Colonial History on AI**: Assess the potential impact of colonial history on the application of AI in Africa.
6. **Fairness and Bias Considerations in Machine Learning in the African Context**: Pay special attention to fairness and bias issues in machine learning within the African context.
7. **Community-Driven Data Generation, Design, and Model Deployment Methods**: Explore community-driven methods to generate representative data and design and deploy models.

By combining qualitative and quantitative research methods, including in-depth interviews (IDIs) and surveys, this study aims to comprehensively understand the prospects, challenges, and opportunities of AI in the African health sector from both expert and general public perspectives. This not only helps policymakers make more informed decisions but also provides direction for further research.