High performance liquid chromatography columns and column technology: a state-of-the art review (Parts I and II).

R. Majors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/18.10.487

Journal of Chromatographic Science

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

SDCEP Dental Prescribing app

D. Richards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400867

2012-06-01

Evidence-Based Dentistry

Abstract:
Disposable catheter dummy. A new device for x-ray examination of the upper digestive tract in infants.

K. Bergström,H. Jorulf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1440-1673.1971.TB01235.X

1971-02-01

Australasian Radiology

Abstract:
AI-Enabled Mental Health Assessment and Intervention: Bridging Gaps in Access and Quality of Care.

Et. al Sivasubramanian Balasubramanian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.159

2023-09-30

Abstract:This paper explores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in revolutionizing mental health assessment and intervention, aiming to address critical gaps in both accessibility and quality of care. Mental health disorders pose a global challenge, with a significant portion of the population facing barriers to timely and effective treatment. Traditional mental health care systems often struggle to meet the increasing demand for services, leading to prolonged waiting times and inadequate support for individuals in distress. Moreover, stigmas surrounding mental health further hinder many from seeking help. The advent of AI technologies offers a promising solution to these challenges. Through advanced machine learning algorithms, AI can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of mental health assessments, enabling early detection of disorders and personalized treatment plans. [1] AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants can provide continuous, accessible support, offering a bridge to care for individuals who may be hesitant or unable to access traditional services. Furthermore, these technologies can help destigmatize mental health discussions by providing a private and non-judgmental space for users. The paper reviews the current landscape of AI applications in mental health, highlighting successful case studies and identifying key ethical considerations. It also delves into the potential pitfalls and challenges associated with AI implementation, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a balance between technological advancement and human-centric care. Ethical considerations, privacy concerns, and the need for ongoing human oversight are crucial elements in ensuring the responsible deployment of AI in mental health contexts. As AI continues to evolve, it is imperative to establish robust frameworks for regulation, accountability, and transparency to safeguard against unintended consequences. The paper concludes by proposing a holistic approach that integrates AI seamlessly into existing mental health care infrastructures, fostering collaboration between technology developers, mental health professionals, and policymakers to create a future where AI contributes significantly to bridging gaps in access and elevating the overall quality of mental health care.
Combined turbo coding and unitary space-time modulation

I. Bahceci,T. Duman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2001.935969

2001-06-24

Abstract:We present a scheme employing turbo codes together with unitary space-time constellations for Rayleigh block fading channels when no channel state information (CSI) is available. We present via simulations that coding gains up to 16 dB is possible over the original uncoded system at a bit error rate of 10/sup -5/.
The quality traits of artificial intelligence operations in predicting mental healthcare professionals’ perceptions: A case study in the psychotherapy division

Shirin Abdallah Alimour,Emad Alnono,Shaima Aljasmi,Hani El Farran,Abdellateef Abdelhafez Alqawasmi,Mohamed Mahmoud Alrabeei,Fanar Shwedeh,Ahmad Aburayya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i4.1438

2024-01-29

Journal of Autonomous Intelligence

Abstract:As advancements in healthcare technologies continue to emerge, the integration of AI-Technology has brought about significant transformations in various healthcare sectors. While substantial advancements have been made in applying AI to enhance physical health, its implementation in the field of mental health is still in its early stages. This descriptive study aims to address this gap by exploring the perspectives of mental health professionals (MHPs) on the acceptance and utilization of AI technology. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was utilized to assess MHPs’ attitudes and beliefs towards AI implementation in psychotherapeutic practices. The sample was compromised of 349 MHPs. The findings reveal the task characteristic (TC) domain as the most influential domain, followed by Performance expectancy (PE), Behavioural intentions (BI), Personal innovativeness in IT (PT), Social influence (SI), Effort expectancy (EE), Perceived substitution crisis (PSC), Technology characteristic (TECH), and Initial trust (IT). The study also identifies statistically significant differences in AI usage based on gender variable, with females demonstrating a higher level of AI usage in comparison to males. Furthermore, the study highlights diverse applications of AI in the field of mental health, including AI-assisted assessments (AAA), chatbots for psychotherapy support (CPS), and data analytics for personalized treatment recommendations (DAPTR). By incorporating mental healthcare professionals’ (MHPs) perspectives, this research significantly contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the acceptance and utilization of AI technology in psychotherapy. The findings offer valuable insights into MHPs’ perceptions, concerns, and perceived advantages associated with integrating AI technology within clinical settings in the field of mental health.
Artificial intelligence is set to transform mental health services

Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal,Meera Narasimhan,Mary V Seeman,Haitham Jahrami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852923002456

Abstract:The current development in the field of artificial intelligence and its applications has advantages and disadvantages in the digital age that we now live in. The state of the use of AI for mental health has to be assessed by stakeholders, which includes all of us. We must comprehend the trends, gaps, opportunities, challenges, and shortcomings of this new technology. As the field evolves, rules, regulatory frameworks, guidelines, standards, and policies will develop and will progressively scale upwards. To advance the field, mental health professionals must be prepared to meet obstacles and seize possibilities presented by creative and disruptive technologies like AI. Therefore, a collaborative strategy must include multi-stakeholder participation in basic, translational, and clinical aspects of AI. Mental health practitioners need to be ready to face challenges and embrace and harness the power of innovative and disruptive technology such as AI that could offer to move the field forward.
Perceptions and Needs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care to Increase Adoption: Scoping Review

Han Shi Jocelyn Chew,Palakorn Achananuparp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/32939

IF: 7.076

2022-01-14

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health care service delivery. However, the perceptions and needs of such systems remain elusive, hindering efforts to promote AI adoption in health care. Objective This study aims to provide an overview of the perceptions and needs of AI to increase its adoption in health care. Methods A systematic scoping review was conducted according to the 5-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley. Articles that described the perceptions and needs of AI in health care were searched across nine databases: ACM Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Embase, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies that were published from inception until June 21, 2021. Articles that were not specific to AI, not research studies, and not written in English were omitted. Results Of the 3666 articles retrieved, 26 (0.71%) were eligible and included in this review. The mean age of the participants ranged from 30 to 72.6 years, the proportion of men ranged from 0% to 73.4%, and the sample sizes for primary studies ranged from 11 to 2780. The perceptions and needs of various populations in the use of AI were identified for general, primary, and community health care; chronic diseases self-management and self-diagnosis; mental health; and diagnostic procedures. The use of AI was perceived to be positive because of its availability, ease of use, and potential to improve efficiency and reduce the cost of health care service delivery. However, concerns were raised regarding the lack of trust in data privacy, patient safety, technological maturity, and the possibility of full automation. Suggestions for improving the adoption of AI in health care were highlighted: enhancing personalization and customizability; enhancing empathy and personification of AI-enabled chatbots and avatars; enhancing user experience, design, and interconnectedness with other devices; and educating the public on AI capabilities. Several corresponding mitigation strategies were also identified in this study. Conclusions The perceptions and needs of AI in its use in health care are crucial in improving its adoption by various stakeholders. Future studies and implementations should consider the points highlighted in this study to enhance the acceptability and adoption of AI in health care. This would facilitate an increase in the effectiveness and efficiency of health care service delivery to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promises

Gemma Espejo,Wade Reiner,Michael Wenzinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44748

2023-09-05

Cureus

Abstract:The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) heralds a significant revolution in healthcare, particularly in mental health. AI's potential spans diagnostic algorithms, data analysis from diverse sources, and real-time patient monitoring. It is essential for clinicians to remain informed about AI's progress and limitations. The inherent complexity of mental disorders, limited objective data, and retrospective studies pose challenges to the application of AI. Privacy concerns, bias, and the risk of AI replacing human care also loom. Regulatory oversight and physician involvement are needed for equitable AI implementation. AI integration and use in psychotherapy and other services are on the horizon. Patient trust, feasibility, clinical efficacy, and clinician acceptance are prerequisites. In the future, governing bodies must decide on AI ownership, governance, and integration approaches. While AI can enhance clinical decision-making and efficiency, it might also exacerbate moral dilemmas, autonomy loss, and issues regarding the scope of practice. Striking a balance between AI's strengths and limitations involves utilizing AI as a validated clinical supplement under medical supervision, necessitating active clinician involvement in AI research, ethics, and regulation. AI's trajectory must align with optimizing mental health treatment and upholding compassionate care.
Perception of the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Practices Among Healthcare Professionals in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

Adithyan N,Rupal Roy Chowdhury,Padmavathy L,Roshni Mary Peter,Anantharaman Vv

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69910

2024-09-22

Cureus

Abstract:Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform healthcare practices, but the successful adoption of AI depends on the perception and acceptance of healthcare professionals. This study aimed to assess the understanding of AI concepts, recognize the attitude toward AI integration, and identify the barriers to AI adoption among healthcare professionals in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, and paramedics, in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Chengalpattu district, India. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers to AI adoption. The chi-square test was used to analyze the associations between variables. Results: The majority of the participants, i.e., 54% (n = 108), had moderate knowledge about AI adoption, while 48% (n = 96) had a low attitude toward it. Barriers to the adoption of AI in healthcare practices among healthcare professionals were low among the majority, i.e., 49% (n = 98), of the participants. A statistically significant association was found between knowledge and attitude (X² = 18.052, df = 4, p = 0.001), i.e., healthcare professionals with moderate knowledge levels had low attitudes toward the adoption of AI. A statistically significant association was also found between knowledge and perceived barriers (X² = 31.235, df = 4, p = 0.00), i.e., healthcare professionals with higher knowledge levels perceived lower barriers to the adoption of AI. Conclusion: The study highlights the need for education and training to improve knowledge, foster positive attitudes, and address the perceived barriers to AI adoption among healthcare professionals. Future research should focus on developing targeted interventions to enhance the understanding and acceptance of AI in healthcare practices.
Local treatment with human recombinant interleukin 2 inhibits growth of MC-induced sarcomas in syngeneic mice.

J. Bubeník,J. Kieler,M. Indrová

Folia biologica

Abstract:In previous communications we have demonstrated that crude rat interleukin 2 and partially purified mouse interleukin 2 were capable of inhibiting growth of transplantable, MC-induced mouse sarcomas in syngeneic recipients. Here we report that repeated peritumoral injections of highly purified human recombinant interleukin 2 can inhibit growth of these mouse sarcomas and prolong survival of tumour-bearing mice. These findings taken together and the ready availability of high doses of recombinant human interleukin 2 substantiate our proposal for initiation of clinical trials using local administration of the interleukin 2 (Bubeník et al. 1983) in selected cancer patients.
No-carrier-added meta-[123I]iodobenzylguanidine: synthesis and preliminary evaluation.

G. Vaidyanathan,M. Zalutsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-8051(94)00078-X

IF: 2.947

Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Abstract:
Using Conversational AI to Facilitate Mental Health Assessments and Improve Clinical Efficiency Within Psychotherapy Services: Real-World Observational Study

Keno Juechems,Ross Harper,Tobias U Hauser,Mona Stylianou,M. Rollwage,J. Habicht,Sruthi Viswanathan,Ben Carrington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/44358

2023-01-16

Abstract:Background Most mental health care providers face the challenge of increased demand for psychotherapy in the absence of increased funding or staffing. To overcome this supply-demand imbalance, care providers must increase the efficiency of service delivery. Objective In this study, we examined whether artificial intelligence (AI)–enabled digital solutions can help mental health care practitioners to use their time more efficiently, and thus reduce strain on services and improve patient outcomes. Methods In this study, we focused on the use of an AI solution (Limbic Access) to support initial patient referral and clinical assessment within the UK’s National Health Service. Data were collected from 9 Talking Therapies services across England, comprising 64,862 patients. Results We showed that the use of this AI solution improves clinical efficiency by reducing the time clinicians spend on mental health assessments. Furthermore, we found improved outcomes for patients using the AI solution in several key metrics, such as reduced wait times, reduced dropout rates, improved allocation to appropriate treatment pathways, and, most importantly, improved recovery rates. When investigating the mechanism by which the AI solution achieved these improvements, we found that the provision of clinically relevant information ahead of clinical assessment was critical for these observed effects. Conclusions Our results emphasize the utility of using AI solutions to support the mental health workforce, further highlighting the potential of AI solutions to increase the efficiency of care delivery and improve clinical outcomes for patients.

Psychology,Medicine,Computer Science
Artificial intelligence in primary care practice: Qualitative study to understand perspectives on using AI to derive patient social data

Stephanie Garies,Simon Liang,Karen Weyman,Steve Durant,Noor Ramji,Mo Alhaj,Andrew Pinto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.700708e102

Abstract:Objective: To understand the perspectives of primary care clinicians and health system leaders on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to derive information about patients' social determinants of health. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Ontario, Canada. Methods: Semistructured, 30-minute virtual interviews were conducted with eligible participants across Ontario wherein they were asked about their perceptions of using AI to derive social data for patients. A descriptive content analysis was used to elicit themes from the data. Main findings: A total of 12 interviews were conducted with 7 family physicians, 3 clinical team members of various health professions, and 2 health system leaders. Five main themes described the current state of social determinants of health information, perceived benefits of and concerns with using AI to derive social data, how participants would want to see and use AI-derived social data, and suggestions for ethical principles that should underpin the development of this AI tool. Conclusion: Most participants were enthusiastic about the possibility of using AI to derive social data for patients in primary care but noted concerns that should be addressed first. These findings can guide the development of AI-based tools for use in primary care settings.
Beliefs, experiences and concerns of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: A qualitative synthesis

Carol-Ann Fazakarley,Maria Breen,Ben Thompson,Paul Leeson,Victoria Williamson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241230075

2024-01-01

Digital Health

Abstract:Objective Artificial intelligence (AI) is a developing field in the context of healthcare. As this technology continues to be implemented in patient care, there is a growing need to understand the thoughts and experiences of stakeholders in this area to ensure that future AI development and implementation is successful. The aim of this study was to conduct a literature search of qualitative studies exploring the opinions of stakeholders such as clinicians, patients, and technology experts in order to establish the most common themes and ideas that have been presented in this research. Methods A literature search was conducted of existing qualitative research on stakeholder beliefs about the use of AI use in healthcare. Twenty-one papers were selected and analysed resulting in the development of four key themes relating to patient care, patient–doctor relationships, lack of education and resources, and the need for regulations. Results Overall, patients and healthcare workers are open to the use of AI in care and appear positive about potential benefits. However, concerns were raised relating to the lack of empathy in interactions of AI tools, and potential risks that may arise from the data collection needed for AI use and development. Stakeholders in the healthcare, technology, and business sectors all stressed that there was a lack of appropriate education, funding, and guidelines surrounding AI, and these concerns needed to be addressed to ensure future implementation is safe and suitable for patient care. Conclusion Ultimately, the results found in this study highlighted that there was a need for communication between stakeholder in order for these concerns to be addressed, mitigate potential risks, and maximise benefits for patients and clinicians alike. The results also identified a need for further qualitative research in this area to further understand stakeholder experiences as AI use continues to develop.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,medical informatics,health policy & services
Health Care Professionals' Views on the Use of Passive Sensing, AI, and Machine Learning in Mental Health Care: Systematic Review With Meta-Synthesis

Jessica Rogan,Sandra Bucci,Joseph Firth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/49577

2024-01-24

JMIR Mental Health

Abstract:Background: Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent worldwide. Passive sensing technologies and applied artificial intelligence (AI) methods can provide an innovative means of supporting the management of mental health problems and enhancing the quality of care. However, the views of stakeholders are important in understanding the potential barriers to and facilitators of their implementation. Objective: This study aims to review, critically appraise, and synthesize qualitative findings relating to the views of mental health care professionals on the use of passive sensing and AI in mental health care. Methods: A systematic search of qualitative studies was performed using 4 databases. A meta-synthesis approach was used, whereby studies were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach within a critical realist epistemological framework. Results: Overall, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria. The 3 main themes were uses of passive sensing and AI in clinical practice, barriers to and facilitators of use in practice, and consequences for service users. A total of 5 subthemes were identified: barriers, facilitators, empowerment, risk to well-being, and data privacy and protection issues. Conclusions: Although clinicians are open-minded about the use of passive sensing and AI in mental health care, important factors to consider are service user well-being, clinician workloads, and therapeutic relationships. Service users and clinicians must be involved in the development of digital technologies and systems to ensure ease of use. The development of, and training in, clear policies and guidelines on the use of passive sensing and AI in mental health care, including risk management and data security procedures, will also be key to facilitating clinician engagement. The means for clinicians and service users to provide feedback on how the use of passive sensing and AI in practice is being received should also be considered. Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022331698; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=331698

psychiatry
Experiences of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative study of UK clinician and key stakeholder perspectives

C A Fazakarley,Maria Breen,Paul Leeson,Ben Thompson,Victoria Williamson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076950

IF: 3.006

2023-12-11

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing field in healthcare, with tools being developed across various specialties to support healthcare professionals and reduce workloads. It is important to understand the experiences of professionals working in healthcare to ensure that future AI tools are acceptable and effectively implemented. The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences and perceptions of UK healthcare workers and other key stakeholders about the use of AI in the National Health Service (NHS). Design: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews conducted remotely via MS Teams. Thematic analysis was carried out. Setting: NHS and UK higher education institutes. Participants: Thirteen participants were recruited, including clinical and non-clinical participants working for the NHS and researchers working to develop AI tools for healthcare settings. Results: Four core themes were identified: positive perceptions of AI; potential barriers to using AI in healthcare; concerns regarding AI use and steps needed to ensure the acceptability of future AI tools. Overall, we found that those working in healthcare were generally open to the use of AI and expected it to have many benefits for patients and facilitate access to care. However, concerns were raised regarding the security of patient data, the potential for misdiagnosis and that AI could increase the burden on already strained healthcare staff. Conclusion: This study found that healthcare staff are willing to engage with AI research and incorporate AI tools into care pathways. Going forward, the NHS and AI developers will need to collaborate closely to ensure that future tools are suitable for their intended use and do not negatively impact workloads or patient trust. Future AI studies should continue to incorporate the views of key stakeholders to improve tool acceptability. Trial registration number: NCT05028179; ISRCTN15113915; IRAS ref: 293515.
Glipizide: an oral hypoglycemic drug.

G. Wensing

Abstract:
Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review

Roberto Tornero-Costa,Antonio Martinez-Millana,Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat,Ledia Lazeri,Vicente Traver,David Novillo-Ortiz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/42045

2023-02-03

JMIR Mental Health

Abstract:Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is giving rise to a revolution in medicine and health care. Mental health conditions are highly prevalent in many countries, and the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk of further erosion of the mental well-being in the population. Therefore, it is relevant to assess the current status of the application of AI toward mental health research to inform about trends, gaps, opportunities, and challenges. Objective: This study aims to perform a systematic overview of AI applications in mental health in terms of methodologies, data, outcomes, performance, and quality. Methods: A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane databases was conducted to collect records of use cases of AI for mental health disorder studies from January 2016 to November 2021. Records were screened for eligibility if they were a practical implementation of AI in clinical trials involving mental health conditions. Records of AI study cases were evaluated and categorized by the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). Data related to trial settings, collection methodology, features, outcomes, and model development and evaluation were extracted following the CHARMS (Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies) guideline. Further, evaluation of risk of bias is provided. Results: A total of 429 nonduplicated records were retrieved from the databases and 129 were included for a full assessment—18 of which were manually added. The distribution of AI applications in mental health was found unbalanced between ICD-11 mental health categories. Predominant categories were Depressive disorders (n=70) and Schizophrenia or other primary psychotic disorders (n=26). Most interventions were based on randomized controlled trials (n=62), followed by prospective cohorts (n=24) among observational studies. AI was typically applied to evaluate quality of treatments (n=44) or stratify patients into subgroups and clusters (n=31). Models usually applied a combination of questionnaires and scales to assess symptom severity using electronic health records (n=49) as well as medical images (n=33). Quality assessment revealed important flaws in the process of AI application and data preprocessing pipelines. One-third of the studies (n=56) did not report any preprocessing or data preparation. One-fifth of the models were developed by comparing several methods (n=35) without assessing their suitability in advance and a small proportion reported external validation (n=21). Only 1 paper reported a second assessment of a previous AI model. Risk of bias and transparent reporting yielded low scores due to a poor reporting of the strategy for adjusting hyperparameters, coefficients, and the explainability of the models. International collaboration was anecdotal (n=17) and data and developed models mostly remained private (n=126). Conclusions: These significant shortcomings, alongside the lack of information to ensure reproducibility and transparency, are indicative of the challenges that AI in mental health needs to face before contributing to a solid base for knowledge generation and for being a support tool in mental health management.

psychiatry
Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Psychological and Mental Health Promotion: An Opinion Piece

S. Gumede,S. Lalla-Edward,Depika Dwarka,K. Oladimeji,Athini Nyatela

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/2958-3918/14548

2023-09-21

Abstract:The digital revolution has made integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into the medical sector easier. AI is currently being used to speed up the detection of diseases in their early stages, facilitate the delineation and understanding of disease variations, and improve optimised treatment protocols. Psychology is no exception, as new role players have emerged, most notably the incorporation of AI into both psychological research and clinical practice. However, there is an apparent unease with AI as a technological breakthrough advancing science in mental health, such as data privacy, national guidelines on the use of AI, successful integration of users into the clinical setting and empathy, compared to human psychologists. Regardless, AI functions in psychology are gradually snowballing. We present an opinion on the impact of AI on improving mental health based on the exploration of available published evidence. We highlight the potential of AI in improving mental health care through mental health disorder detection, diagnosis, treatment, and public health education. The article also discusses the potential challenges and future directions, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and developing novel AI-based approaches to improve mental health outcomes.

Psychology,Computer Science,Medicine
Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey

Mingyang Chen,Bo Zhang,Ziting Cai,Samuel Seery,Maria J. Gonzalez,Nasra M. Ali,Ran Ren,Youlin Qiao,Peng Xue,Yu Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.990604

IF: 3.9

2022-08-31

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Background Artificial intelligence (AI) needs to be accepted and understood by physicians and medical students, but few have systematically assessed their attitudes. We investigated clinical AI acceptance among physicians and medical students around the world to provide implementation guidance. Materials and methods We conducted a two-stage study, involving a foundational systematic review of physician and medical student acceptance of clinical AI. This enabled us to design a suitable web-based questionnaire which was then distributed among practitioners and trainees around the world. Results Sixty studies were included in this systematic review, and 758 respondents from 39 countries completed the online questionnaire. Five (62.50%) of eight studies reported 65% or higher awareness regarding the application of clinical AI. Although, only 10–30% had actually used AI and 26 (74.28%) of 35 studies suggested there was a lack of AI knowledge. Our questionnaire uncovered 38% awareness rate and 20% utility rate of clinical AI, although 53% lacked basic knowledge of clinical AI. Forty-five studies mentioned attitudes toward clinical AI, and over 60% from 38 (84.44%) studies were positive about AI, although they were also concerned about the potential for unpredictable, incorrect results. Seventy-seven percent were optimistic about the prospect of clinical AI. The support rate for the statement that AI could replace physicians ranged from 6 to 78% across 40 studies which mentioned this topic. Five studies recommended that efforts should be made to increase collaboration. Our questionnaire showed 68% disagreed that AI would become a surrogate physician, but believed it should assist in clinical decision-making. Participants with different identities, experience and from different countries hold similar but subtly different attitudes. Conclusion Most physicians and medical students appear aware of the increasing application of clinical AI, but lack practical experience and related knowledge. Overall, participants have positive but reserved attitudes about AI. In spite of the mixed opinions around clinical AI becoming a surrogate physician, there was a consensus that collaborations between the two should be strengthened. Further education should be conducted to alleviate anxieties associated with change and adopting new technologies.

medicine, general & internal

High performance liquid chromatography columns and column technology: a state-of-the art review (Parts I and II).

SDCEP Dental Prescribing app

Disposable catheter dummy. A new device for x-ray examination of the upper digestive tract in infants.

AI-Enabled Mental Health Assessment and Intervention: Bridging Gaps in Access and Quality of Care.

Combined turbo coding and unitary space-time modulation

The quality traits of artificial intelligence operations in predicting mental healthcare professionals’ perceptions: A case study in the psychotherapy division

Artificial intelligence is set to transform mental health services

Perceptions and Needs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care to Increase Adoption: Scoping Review

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promises

Perception of the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Practices Among Healthcare Professionals in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

Local treatment with human recombinant interleukin 2 inhibits growth of MC-induced sarcomas in syngeneic mice.

No-carrier-added meta-[123I]iodobenzylguanidine: synthesis and preliminary evaluation.

Using Conversational AI to Facilitate Mental Health Assessments and Improve Clinical Efficiency Within Psychotherapy Services: Real-World Observational Study

Artificial intelligence in primary care practice: Qualitative study to understand perspectives on using AI to derive patient social data

Beliefs, experiences and concerns of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: A qualitative synthesis

Health Care Professionals' Views on the Use of Passive Sensing, AI, and Machine Learning in Mental Health Care: Systematic Review With Meta-Synthesis

Experiences of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative study of UK clinician and key stakeholder perspectives

Glipizide: an oral hypoglycemic drug.

Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review

Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Psychological and Mental Health Promotion: An Opinion Piece

Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey