Abstract:This paper is concerned with exploring what is needed in making progress towards establishing a mature methodology for human and social inquiry. The approach that is proposed takes the somewhat radical position which sees the distinction between qualitative and quantitative methodologies as little more than a red herring. When focus is placed upon the type of data being collected, rather than on the research design, the result is merely a polarization of the different methodological approaches, deflecting away from what is the underlying critical issue – the logic of inquiry. The crucial insight here is that at least three fundamentally different logics of inquiry can be distinguished: (i) theory–driven; (ii) data–driven; and (iii) explanation–driven, each with its own inherent patterns of logical reasoning. These different logics of inquiry have radical implications for research design, and in particular, the phrasing of the research question(s). This in turn has major implications for the clarification of what is really at stake in the confrontation between qualitative and quantitative, with respect to paradigm assumptions, formulating the research question, sampling, data collection, analysis, and critical evaluation, etc. Moreover, the ongoing debate surrounding the issue of mixed method design can be rey–focussed on how contrasting logics of inquiry can come to be combined into one research programme. It needs to be acknowledged that mixed methods probably has a surprisingly long history, and is more inherent to the scientific method than is commonly acknowledged. By facing these issues, the pay–off is a more authentic picture of what ‘the scientific method’ might actually entail for psychology.

H is for Human and How (Not) To Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI

Dilemmas in qualitative health research

Evaluating quality in human-robot interaction: A systematic search and classification of performance and human-centered factors, measures and metrics towards an industry 5.0

Qualitative and Critical Research in Information Systems and Human Computer Interaction: Divergent and Convergent Paths

The Review and Analysis of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) Principles

HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies: 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings

[Reconsidering evaluation criteria regarding health care research: toward an integrative framework of quantitative and qualitative criteria]

Qualitative inquiry, mixed methods and the logic of scientific inquiry

Human–computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends

Human-Engaged Computing: the future of Human–Computer Interaction

Study On Evaluation Model Of Internet Social Networking Applications Based On Humanology Research

Fuzzy Multi-level Synthetic Evaluation for Human Computer Interface

An assessment of human–computer interaction research in management information systems: topics and methods

On the quantification of human-robot collaboration quality

Qualitative software engineering research -- reflections and guidelines

HCI Models for Digital Musical Instruments: Methodologies for Rigorous Testing of Digital Musical Instruments

Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction

The critical posthumanities and postqualitative inquiry in psychology

15 Years of (Who)man Robot Interaction: Reviewing the H in Human-Robot Interaction

User experience: tool for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) design

Is Quantitative Research Ethical? Tools for Ethically Practicing, Evaluating, and Using Quantitative Research