Qualitative inquiry, mixed methods and the logic of scientific inquiry

D. Hiles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2014.1.17.49

Abstract:This paper is concerned with exploring what is needed in making progress towards establishing a mature methodology for human and social inquiry. The approach that is proposed takes the somewhat radical position which sees the distinction between qualitative and quantitative methodologies as little more than a red herring. When focus is placed upon the type of data being collected, rather than on the research design, the result is merely a polarization of the different methodological approaches, deflecting away from what is the underlying critical issue – the logic of inquiry. The crucial insight here is that at least three fundamentally different logics of inquiry can be distinguished: (i) theory–driven; (ii) data–driven; and (iii) explanation–driven, each with its own inherent patterns of logical reasoning. These different logics of inquiry have radical implications for research design, and in particular, the phrasing of the research question(s). This in turn has major implications for the clarification of what is really at stake in the confrontation between qualitative and quantitative, with respect to paradigm assumptions, formulating the research question, sampling, data collection, analysis, and critical evaluation, etc. Moreover, the ongoing debate surrounding the issue of mixed method design can be rey–focussed on how contrasting logics of inquiry can come to be combined into one research programme. It needs to be acknowledged that mixed methods probably has a surprisingly long history, and is more inherent to the scientific method than is commonly acknowledged. By facing these issues, the pay–off is a more authentic picture of what ‘the scientific method’ might actually entail for psychology.

Sociology