Abstract:We experimentally study voter turnout in two-tier elections when the electorate consists of multiple groups, such as states. Votes are aggregated within the groups by the winner-take-all rule or the proportional rule, and the group-level decisions are combined to determine the winner. We observe that, compared with the theoretical prediction, turnout is significantly lower in the minority camp (the Titanic effect) and significantly higher in the majority camp (the behavioral bandwagon effect), and these effects are stronger under the proportional rule than under the winner-take-all rule. As a result, the distribution of voter welfare becomes more unequal than theoretically predicted, and this welfare effect is stronger under the proportional rule than under the winner-take-all rule.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the issue of voter turnout in a two-tier electoral system, particularly under the Winner-Take-All (WTA) rule or Proportional Representation (PR) rule within groups (such as states). The core issue of the study is the discrepancy between observed behavior and theoretical predictions, and the analysis of how these differences impact voter welfare. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following issues: 1. **Behavioral Bias**: The study finds that in minority camps, actual voter turnout is lower than theoretically expected (referred to as the "Titanic Effect"), while in majority camps, actual voter turnout is higher than theoretically expected (referred to as the "Bandwagon Effect"). These two effects are more pronounced under the Proportional Representation rule than under the Winner-Take-All rule. 2. **Welfare Impact**: Due to changes in voter turnout, the actual welfare distribution becomes more unequal compared to theoretical predictions, especially under the Proportional Representation rule. 3. **Rule Comparison**: The paper compares the impact of the Winner-Take-All rule and the Proportional Representation rule on voter behavior and welfare. The paper constructs a model to simulate an election with two candidates, involving three voter groups (e.g., states), each with a certain weight (e.g., electoral votes). Voters need to decide whether to vote for their preferred candidate or abstain from voting. The voting results within groups are aggregated according to different rules (WTA or PR) to determine the final winner. The experimental design simplifies the decision-making problem by setting up one human group and two groups controlled by computer programs. The experimental results show significant differences in voter turnout between minority and majority groups, leading to a more unequal welfare distribution than theoretically predicted. Moreover, these effects are more pronounced under the Proportional Representation rule, providing important empirical evidence for evaluating two-tier electoral rules.

Jumping on the bandwagon and off the Titanic: an experimental study of turnout in two-tier voting

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Spectators Who Spectate and Voters Who Vote

Does Proportionality Increase Turnout? A Study of Adaptation to Oscillating Electoral Systems

Do voters choose rationally, irrationally or at random? Data and theory for proportional elections

District magnitude and electoral mobilization: how uneven electoral systems shift the focus of campaign efforts by political parties

Social networks and voter turnout

Candidate Incentive Distributions: How voting methods shape electoral incentives

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

On influence and compromise in two-tier voting systems

Universal size effects for populations in group-outcome decision-making problems

Partially Informed Elections -- Analyzing the Impact of Forced Ballot Truncation on Bucklin, Coombs, Plurality with Runoff, and Schulze

Social capital, social heterogeneity, and electoral turnout

Paradoxical Oddities in Two Multiwinner Elections from Scotland

Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Group Incentives and Rational Voting

Condorcet's Jury Theorem with Abstention

The probability of casting a pivotal vote in an Instant Runoff Voting election

A unified approach to measuring unequal representation

Universal Statistics of Competition in Democratic Elections

Multiwinner Elections and the Spoiler Effect