Abstract:The apportionment problem constitutes a fundamental problem in democratic societies: How to distribute a fixed number of seats among a set of states in proportion to the states' populations? This--seemingly simple--task has led to a rich literature and has become well known in the context of the US House of Representatives. In this paper, we connect the design of monotone apportionment methods to classic problems from discrete geometry and combinatorial optimization and explore the extent to which randomization can enhance proportionality. We first focus on the well-studied family of stationary divisor methods, which satisfy the strong population monotonicity property, and show that this family produces only a slightly superlinear number of different outputs as a function of the number of states. While our upper and lower bounds leave a small gap, we show that--surprisingly--closing this gap would solve a long-standing open problem from discrete geometry, known as the complexity of $k$-levels in line arrangements. The main downside of divisor methods is their violation of the quota axiom, i.e., every state should receive $\lfloor q_i\rfloor$ or $\lceil q_i\rceil$ seats, where $q_i$ is the proportional share of the state. As we show that randomizing over divisor methods can only partially overcome this issue, we propose a relaxed version of divisor methods in which the total number of seats may slightly deviate from the house size. By randomizing over them, we can simultaneously satisfy population monotonicity, quota, and ex-ante proportionality. Finally, we turn our attention to quota-compliant methods that are house-monotone, i.e., no state may lose a seat when the house size is increased. We provide a polyhedral characterization based on network flows, which implies a simple description of all ex-ante proportional randomized methods that are house-monotone and quota-compliant.

A unified approach to measuring unequal representation

District magnitude and electoral mobilization: how uneven electoral systems shift the focus of campaign efforts by political parties

Proportionality in Multiple Dimensions to Design Electoral Systems

On Measuring Two-Party Partisan Bias in Unbalanced States

Measure and collapse of participatory democracy in a two-party system

New Combinatorial Insights for Monotone Apportionment

Monotone Randomized Apportionment

Apportionment with Weighted Seats

Redistricting for Proportionality

The Efficiency Gap, Voter Turnout, and the Efficiency Principle

Measures of Partisan Bias for Legislating Fair Elections

Standardizing Representation for Equality with a Population Seat Index

Cross-National Measurement of Polarization in Political Discourse: Analyzing floor debate in the U.S. and the Japanese legislatures

Asymmetry in Political Geography and Compactness in Districting: a Computational Analysis of Bias

Proportional Representation in Metric Spaces and Low-Distortion Committee Selection

Selecting Representative Bodies: An Axiomatic View

Achieving fully proportional representation: Approximability results

The Census and the Second Law: An Entropic Approach to Optimal Apportionment for the U.S. House of Representatives

Congressional Apportionment: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach

A Computational Approach to Measuring Vote Elasticity and Competitiveness

Comparing Voting Districts with Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis