Abstract:The traditional axiomatic approach to voting is motivated by the problem of reconciling differences in subjective preferences. In contrast, a dominant line of work in the theory of voting over the past 15 years has considered a different kind of scenario, also fundamental to voting, in which there is a genuinely "best" outcome that voters would agree on if they only had enough information. This type of scenario has its roots in the classical Condorcet Jury Theorem; it includes cases such as jurors in a criminal trial who all want to reach the correct verdict but disagree in their inferences from the available evidence, or a corporate board of directors who all want to improve the company's revenue, but who have different information that favors different options. This style of voting leads to a natural set of questions: each voter has a {\em private signal} that provides probabilistic information about which option is best, and a central question is whether a simple plurality voting system, which tabulates votes for different options, can cause the group decision to arrive at the correct option. We show that plurality voting is powerful enough to achieve this: there is a way for voters to map their signals into votes for options in such a way that --- with sufficiently many voters --- the correct option receives the greatest number of votes with high probability. We show further, however, that any process for achieving this is inherently expensive in the number of voters it requires: succeeding in identifying the correct option with probability at least $1 - \eta$ requires $\Omega(n^3 \epsilon^{-2} \log \eta^{-1})$ voters, where $n$ is the number of options and $\epsilon$ is a distributional measure of the minimum difference between the options.

Spectators Who Spectate and Voters Who Vote

Social networks and voter turnout

Modeling Peoples Voting Behavior with Poll Information

Voting Contagion

Election turnout statistics in many countries: similarities, differences, and a diffusive field model for decision-making

Social Class and Voter Turnout in China

Modeling undecided voters to forecast elections: From bandwagon behavior and the spiral of silence perspective

Persuasion, Betrayal and Regret in Election Campaigns

The Politics of Attention

Candidate Incentive Distributions: How voting methods shape electoral incentives

Explaining the decision to vote: non-nested and nested tests of three competing theories

Dislike of general opinion makes for tight elections

Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting

Universal Statistics of Competition in Democratic Elections

The Efficiency Gap, Voter Turnout, and the Efficiency Principle

Single Transferable Vote and Paradoxes of Negative and Positive Involvement

VOTING AND SOCIAL PRESSURE UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION

Voting with Limited Information and Many Alternatives

Survey mode and satisfaction with democracy