Abstract:Since the public release of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), extensive discourse has emerged concerning the potential advantages and challenges of integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into education. In the realm of information systems, research on technology adoption is crucial for understanding the diverse factors influencing the uptake of specific technologies. Theoretical frameworks, refined and validated over decades, serve as guiding tools to elucidate the individual and organizational dynamics, obstacles, and perceptions surrounding technology adoption. However, while several models have been proposed, they often prioritize elucidating the factors that facilitate acceptance over those that impede it, typically focusing on the student perspective and leaving a gap in empirical evidence regarding educators viewpoints. Given the pivotal role educators play in higher education, this study aims to develop a theoretical model to empirically predict the barriers preventing educators from adopting GenAI in their classrooms. Acknowledging the lack of theoretical models tailored to identifying such barriers, our approach is grounded in the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) framework and augmented with constructs from the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework. This model is transformed into a measurement instrument employing a quantitative approach, complemented by a qualitative approach to enrich the analysis and uncover concerns related to GenAI adoption in the higher education domain.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the obstacles faced by higher - education educators when using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in the classroom. Specifically, the paper aims to develop a theoretical model to empirically predict and explain the reasons for educators' resistance to GenAI. This research fills a gap in existing research, because most studies mainly focus on the student perspective and factors of technology acceptance, while ignoring the views of educators and their reasons for technological resistance. ### Main Problems of the Paper 1. **Research Background**: - With the public release of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, there has been an increasing number of discussions about the advantages and challenges of their application in education. - Most existing research focuses on factors of technology acceptance, especially from the student perspective, while there is insufficient research on the resistance factors of educators to GenAI. 2. **Research Objectives**: - Develop a theoretical model, combining the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) and the Technology - Organization - Environment (TOE) framework, to identify and understand the resistance factors of educators to GenAI. - Verify this model through quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a more comprehensive understanding. 3. **Research Methods**: - Use IRT to explain an individual's resistance to innovation, and combine the organizational and environmental factors in the TOE framework to construct a comprehensive model. - Design a questionnaire to collect educators' attitudes and opinions towards GenAI, including closed - ended and open - ended questions. - Conduct quantitative analysis through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and other statistical analysis methods, and combine qualitative data analysis to enrich the research results. ### Main Hypotheses The paper proposes eight hypotheses, involving the following aspects: - **Traditional Barrier (TB)**: Traditional barriers have a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. - **Image Barrier (IB)**: Image barriers have a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. - **Risk Barrier (RB)**: Risk barriers have a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. - **Usage Barrier (UB)**: Usage barriers have a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. - **Value Barrier (VB)**: Value barriers have a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. - **Organizational Background (OB)**: Organizational background has a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. - **Environmental Background (EB)**: Environmental background has a positive impact on educators' resistance to GenAI. ### Conclusion This research, by integrating the IRT and TOE frameworks, proposes a novel theoretical model, aiming to systematically identify and explain the resistance factors of educators to GenAI. This not only helps to better understand the acceptance process of educators towards new technologies, but also provides valuable references for improving the application of GenAI in education in the future. ### Formula Representation No specific mathematical formulas are involved in the paper, but if there are formulas to be expressed, they will be presented in the following Markdown format: ```markdown $$ Formula content $$ ``` For example: $$ H_1: \text{More than half of educators prohibit the use of GenAI tools in their courses.} $$ It is hoped that this information can help you better understand the research purpose and methods of this paper.

To accept or not to accept? An IRT-TOE Framework to Understand Educators' Resistance to Generative AI in Higher Education

Generative AI Adoption in the Classroom: A Contextual Exploration Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT)

Generative AI Adoption in Classroom in Context of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT)

What is the role of ChatGPT and other large language model AI in Higher Education?

Transforming Teachers' Roles and Agencies in the Era of Generative AI: Perceptions, Acceptance, Knowledge, and Practices

Teaching and testing in the era of text-generative AI: exploring the needs of students and teachers

Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education

Modeling Teachers’ Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education: The Role of AI Literacy, Intelligent TPACK, and Perceived Trust

Generative or Degenerative?! Implications of AI Tools in Pre-Service Teacher Education and Reflections on Instructors’ Professional Development

Developing generative AI chatbots conceptual framework for higher education

Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study

Responsible Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education: Developing a "Points to Consider" Approach Based on Faculty Perspectives

ChatGPT in Classrooms: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities in Education

Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education

Pre-service Teachers' Dual Perspectives on Generative AI: Benefits, Challenges, and Integrating into Teaching and Learning

Generative AI in Computing Education: Perspectives of Students and Instructors

Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education

A Study on Teachers' Willingness to Use Generative AI Technology and Its Influencing Factors: Based on an Integrated Model

Analysis of Professors’ Experiences with Generative AI and the Concerns of Classroom Use : Application of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)

Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions