Ravit Dotan,Lisa S. Parker,John G. Radzilowicz
Abstract:This paper proposes an approach to the responsible adoption of generative AI in higher education, employing a ''points to consider'' approach that is sensitive to the goals, values, and structural features of higher education. Higher education's ethos of collaborative faculty governance, pedagogical and research goals, and embrace of academic freedom conflict, the paper argues, with centralized top down approaches to governing AI that are common in the private sector. The paper is based on a semester long effort at the University of Pittsburgh which gathered and organized perspectives on generative AI in higher education through a collaborative, iterative, interdisciplinary process that included recurring group discussions, three standalone focus groups, and an informal survey. The paper presents insights drawn from this effort that give rise to the ''points to consider'' approach the paper develops. These insights include the benefits and risks of potential uses of generative AI In higher education, as well as barriers to its adoption, and culminate in the six normative points to consider when adopting and governing generative AI in institutions of higher education.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to responsibly adopt generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI, GenAI) in higher education. Specifically, the authors are concerned with:
1. **Conflict between goals and values**:
- There is a conflict between the core goals and values of higher education institutions (such as collaborative faculty governance, teaching and research goals, academic freedom) and the centralized top - down AI governance approach (common in the private sector). Therefore, it is necessary to find an AI governance method suitable for the higher education environment.
2. **Understanding and dealing with the impact of GenAI**:
- Higher education institutions face the problems of how to understand the impact of GenAI on their daily operations and ideal pursuits, and how to use and manage these technologies responsibly. Many institutions are seeking to better understand the specific impact of GenAI on higher education and formulate corresponding policies and practices.
3. **Low level of teacher preparedness**:
- Currently, many teachers have a low level of understanding and use of GenAI tools, which may lead to their inability to fully utilize the opportunities brought by these tools and may also lead to improper use. In addition, the high adoption rate of GenAI by students also poses challenges to teachers, especially in terms of academic integrity.
4. **Burden and resource issues**:
- Teachers are worried that the introduction of GenAI will increase additional workloads, such as revising course syllabi, creating new assignments, and evaluating GenAI tools, and these tasks may not be compensated and supported accordingly.
To address these problems, the paper proposes an approach based on "Points to Consider", aiming to provide a flexible and adaptable framework for higher education institutions to guide the adoption and governance of GenAI. This approach emphasizes individual judgment, context - sensitivity, and the ability to respond to the unformed regulatory environment, thereby ensuring that the use of GenAI can be in line with the core goals and values of higher education.
### Summary of main content
- **Background and method**:
- Based on the University of Pittsburgh's one - semester effort, the paper collected and sorted out the views of teachers from different disciplines through repeated group discussions, three independent focus group discussions, and an informal survey.
- **Reasons and obstacles**:
- The paper analyzed the reasons for higher education institutions to adopt GenAI (such as promoting scientific research, achieving educational goals, and responding to economic competition) and the obstacles they face (such as insufficient teacher preparation and additional workload).
- **Potential uses, risks, and benefits**:
- The paper explored in detail the potential uses of GenAI in teaching, research, and administrative work, and also pointed out the related risks and benefits. In particular, the paper proposed some innovative teaching task designs to reduce the possibility of students using GenAI to cheat and improve students' critical understanding of GenAI tools.
- **Policy recommendations**:
- The paper proposed six "Points to Consider" to help decision - makers consider various situations and the views of stakeholders when formulating policies on GenAI use.
Through these efforts, the paper hopes to provide a practical framework for higher education institutions to adopt and manage generative artificial intelligence technologies in a responsible manner.