Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study

Jenny Pettersson,Elias Hult,Tim Eriksson,Tosin Adewumi

2024-04-04

Abstract:We present insightful results of a survey on the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. The transformation of education by GenAI, particularly large language models (LLMs), has been presenting both opportunities and challenges, including cheating by students. We prepared the online survey according to best practices and the questions were created by the authors, who have pedagogy experience. The survey contained 12 questions and a pilot study was first conducted. The survey was then sent to all teachers in multiple departments across different campuses of the university of interest in Sweden: Luleå University of Technology. The survey was available in both Swedish and English. The results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. Preparation is the teaching activity with the most frequency that GenAI is used for and ChatGPT is the most commonly used GenAI. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI, especially as inaccuracies and cheating are the biggest concerns.

Computation and Language

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the acceptance and impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in teaching activities among university teachers. Specifically, the study seeks to answer the following questions:

1. To what extent are university teachers willing to adopt generative artificial intelligence in their teaching and classroom activities?
2. Is there a correlation between the impact of GenAI on teachers' teaching activities and the extent to which they encourage students to use GenAI?

The study collected opinions from teachers at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden through a questionnaire survey and analyzed the application of GenAI in different stages such as teaching preparation, lecturing, and assessment. Additionally, the study discussed teachers' ethical concerns regarding GenAI and their attitudes towards students using GenAI. The results showed that most teachers believed GenAI had a positive impact on their teaching and tended to encourage students to use these tools appropriately. However, a significant number of teachers also expressed concerns about inaccuracies and cheating issues.