Abstract:Quantum games, such as the CHSH game, are used to illustrate the puzzle and power of entanglement. These games are played over many rounds and in each round, the participants, Alice and Bob, each receive a question bit to which they each have to give an answer bit, without being able to communicate during the game. When all possible classical answering strategies are analyzed, it is found that Alice and Bob cannot win more than 75% of the rounds. A higher percentage of wins arguably requires an exploitable bias in the random generation of the question bits or access to "non-local" resources, such as entangled pairs of particles. However, in an actual game, the number of rounds has to be finite and question regimes may come up with unequal likelihood, so there is always a possibility that Alice and Bob win by pure luck. This statistical possibility has to be transparently analyzed for practical applications such as the detection of eavesdropping in quantum communication. Similarly, when Bell tests are used in macroscopic situations to investigate the connection strength between system components and the validity of proposed causal models, the available data are limited and the possible combinations of question bits (measurement settings) may not be controlled to occur with equal likelihood. In the present work, we give a fully self-contained proof for a bound on the probability to win a CHSH game by pure luck without making the usual assumption of only small biases in the random number generators. We also show bounds for the case of unequal probabilities based on results from McDiarmid and Combes and numerically illustrate certain exploitable biases.

On cases where Litt's game is fair

Alice and Bob on $\Bbb X$: reversal, coupling, renewal

How to Answer Questions of the Type: If you toss a coin n times, how likely is HH to show up more than HT?

Note on a Coin Tossing Problem Posed by Daniel Litt

A proof that HT is more likely to outnumber HH than vice versa in a sequence of n coin flips

Word length, bias and bijections in Penney's ante

A Fair Shake: How close can the sum of $n$-sided dice be to a uniform distribution?

How to Lose with Least Probability

Ann wins the nonrepetitive game over four letters and the erase-repetition game over six letters

Choosing 1 of N with and without lucky numbers

Square++: Making a connection game win-lose complementary and playing-fair

A Game of Nontransitive Dice

Coins and Logic

A numbers-on-foreheads game

Winning a CHSH Game without Entangled Particles in a Finite Number of Biased Rounds: How Much Luck Is Needed?

Variable Bias Coin Tossing

A Lattice of Gambles

The naming game in language dynamics revisited

Coexistence of Strong and Weak Social Ties Leads to Fair Allocations of Resources in Finite Populations

Gambler's Ruin? Some Aspects of Coin Tossing

Golden games